Yes, the Devil is in the details. It pays to know just how much Devil is in
there, and in old school 8 bit BASIC, there is much.
Classical Mechanics gives results that are reversible. So if the model isn't,
it's just a numerical flaw, and not a profound fact about physics.
Sent from my
Why don't you send this stuff to vortex-b which is the forum for
OT subjects?
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:06 in response to Terry Blanton, Jones Beene wrote
[snip]Based on what is admittedly too little evidence my feeling is that
first you want densify or convert molecules to pycno or the inverse
Rydberg state which is even denser. For some strange reason the molecule
does
No, not relativistic. This is an interpretation of Miley, with respect to
Lawandy.
It is a dimensional thing. Dense hydrogen only accumulates in two
dimensions. After it accumulates, it may move in 3-space as a bound unit,
but the effect would be similar to the way Mills' describes the
PeatBog,
The subject thread of my posts clearly state OT Off Topic. You are free to
view OT posts or not.
Incidentally, this is not entirely off-topic. These political protests, what
is currently happening in Wisconsin, just like what's happening in the Mid
East are the result of the fact that
PeatBog,
The subject thread of my posts clearly state OT Off Topic. You
are free to view OT posts or not.
I skimmed a few but have largely skipped them. The point is,
though, that vortex-b was created for ot posts. Why not use it?
From PeatBog,
The subject thread of my posts clearly state OT Off Topic. You
are free to view OT posts or not.
I skimmed a few but have largely skipped them. The point is,
though, that vortex-b was created for ot posts. Why not use it?
You ask a reasonable question.
My answer: As you
Your reasons for posting in vortex-b are clear, but I have to
disagree with what you are doing.
If you want to post ot stuff, and you want to play by the vortex
rules, I suggest that you announce in vortex-l that you have a
bunch of stuff that is dear to your heart that you want to post,
but that
Interesting 24 year old paper
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.ms.17.080187.000305
It has been known for some time that the effective mass of electrons can
appear to have a value much greater than free or valence electrons. This
can be a factor of 10,000:1 in some
This test is to see if I am subscribed by
donemitch...@groupkos.com (personal), or
d...@groupkos.com (forums)
Sent from donemitch...@groupkos.com
I made some early mistake and somehow the list deletes me from one and
seems to switch me from the other.
All attempts to unsubscribe are
On 02/18/2011 10:17 PM, Rich Murray wrote:
does classical mechanics always fail to predict or retrodict for 3 or
more Newtonian gravity bodies? Rich Murray 2011.02.18
[ ... ]
In fall, 1982, I wrote a 200-line program in Basic for the
Timex-Sinclair $100 computer with 20KB RAM that would
Most of us don't mind OT posting as long as it is so labeled. Some of
us enjoy OT posts. Virtually everyone is guilty on occasion.
I see that Peaty is posting from a site called teksavvy.com. One
would think that he would know how to create a filter which will
direct [OT] posts to a particular
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:43:01 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Interesting 24 year old paper
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.ms.17.080187.000305
It has been known for some time that the effective mass of electrons can
appear to have a value much greater
Most of us don't mind OT posting as long as it is so labeled.
Some of us enjoy OT posts. Virtually everyone is guilty on
occasion.
Sure. Maybe I'll block the subject, but I want to wait a bit to
see if Bill Beatty weighs in: I enjoyed his hammering of the ot
posters the last time.
On 02/19/2011 10:57 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
PeatBog,
The subject thread of my posts clearly state OT Off Topic. You are free to
view OT posts or not.
Don't sweat it, Steve.
I don't know what's got Peaty in a huff about it, but this series of
posts has been
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
If my understanding is correct, then I don't see how this would make it
more
effective in nucleating condensation of protons, because the extra mass is
not
collocated with the original electron, so it's not as though it's actually a
heavy
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/19/scientists-pleasantly-surprised-by-number-of-earth-sized-distant-planets/?hpt=C2
Scientists pleasantly surprised by number of Earth-size, distant planets
The planet Kepler-10b orbits a star similar to our own Sun in its
temperature, mass and size.
February
http://berkeley.intel-research.net/arahimi/helmet/
Abstract
Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the
protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals. We
investigate the efficacy of three aluminum helmet designs on a sample
group of four individuals. Using
On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:19 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:43:01 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Interesting 24 year old paper
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.ms.
17.080187.000305
It has been known for some time that the
Hello Stephen A. Lawrence,
Thanks for the informative answer. It'd be impressive if the most
accurate methods since this review in 1987 agree with each other far
into the future and past -- how can we find out the details about
results for the 3-body problem, in commonsense terms? Is this
Hmm ... if true that our beloved gov (or elements within) is behind some
kind of weird and contorted effort to control the conduct of the more
susceptible, within the known population of crazies, then why waste the
effort on helmets? ... just set out a few hundred unattended boom boxes in
the
On Feb 19, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
If my understanding is correct, then I don't see how this would
make it more
effective in nucleating condensation of protons, because the
extra mass is not
collocated with the original
BTW - for anyone who wants to join the fun, we set this up as kind of an
American Voices (The Onion) type of interview format, but on another level
of sophistication...
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
Hmm ... if true that our beloved gov (or elements within) is behind some
kind
At 11:12 PM 2/18/2011, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Congratulations on your Sinclair project. I started on a TRS-80.
Heh! Well, *I* -- the word is drawn out -- started on an Altair 8800.
Pthtpthhh!
Jacques Laskar and his colleague Mickal Gastineau in 2009 took a more
thorough approach by directly simulating 2500 possible futures.
Each of the 2500 cases has slightly different initial conditions:
Mercury's position varies by about 1 metre between one simulation and
the next.[13]
In 20
25 matches
Mail list logo
