The plot thickens. It may very well be that the device doesn't have to
deliver more energy than put into it. It may have a market even if it fails
this criterion. I get odd feeling that Mr. Rossi may not know the
difference.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Akira Shirakawa
What does NASA have to say about this?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
http://ecatreport.com/e-cat/andrea-rossi-on-the-e-cat-part-22
*The management team of both Defkalion and AmpEnergo will meet on the 14th
July (2011) together with NASA...*
Damon Craig wrote:
The plot thickens. It may very well be that the device doesn't have to
deliver more energy than put into it.
What the heck are you talking about?!? Of course it delivers more than
you put into it. This is a peculiar thing to say.
It may have a market even if it fails
Another tidbit, but from part 1 of 2...
The post-reaction analysis shows a copper isotope ratio of Cu 63/Cu 65 ~ 1.6,
while the natural
occurrence show a ratio of Cu 63/Cu 65 ~ 2.24 which is a statistically
significant difference. That,
of course, excludes contamination as an explanation of
Smaller is not necessarily better... here's an interesting tidbit from the
ecatreport.
Andrea Rossi stresses that, although one might first think the finer the
better because the finer
the powder the more surface area per volume you get, this is not the case.
Because in order to reach
useful
Didn't you know this contradicts Sven Kullander's statement that the post
reaction sample ratio Cu 63/Cu 65 ~ 2.24? When asked about this in his
blog several weeks ago, Rossi said Kullander is right.
So Rossi continues to supply the media with conflicting information.
Harry
From: Mark
Krivit has modified his statement :
Professors Sven Kullander, retired from Uppsala University, and Hanno
Essén, with the Royal Institute of Technology,
endorsed Rossis claimed technology in a news story on Feb. 23, 2011,
before they had seen or inspected the device *** on
March 29. ***
But he
At 06:26 PM 7/12/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[KRIVIT] Professors Sven Kullander, retired from
Uppsala University, and Hanno Essén, with the
Royal Institute of Technology, endorsed
Rossiâs claimed technology in a news story on
Feb. 23, 2011, before they had seen or inspected
the device.
At 05:25 AM 7/13/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
What does NASA have to say about this?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Alan J Fletcher
mailto:a...@well.coma...@well.com wrote:
http://ecatreport.com/e-cat/andrea-rossi-on-the-e-cat-part-22http://ecatreport.com/e-cat/andrea-rossi-on-the-e-cat-part-22
At 08:55 PM 7/12/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-07-13 02:31, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
http://ecatreport.com/e-cat/andrea-rossi-on-the-e-cat-part-22
The following excerpt from the above interview is wow news to me.
Is NASA going to get actively involved with Rossi? Wow again if true:
A couple of messages did not go through.
We should give serious consideration to moving this discussion group to a
new ISP.
- Jed
Are some UFOs organic? Bova, et al, wrote of sentient atmospheric
beings of Jupiter. Do they exist here. This article provides some
evidence:
http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2011/07/atmospheric-monsters-attack/
T
Rossi is using tubercles to increase the cross-section of his reaction well
over what can be produced in a well ordered nickel lattice. A tubercle is a
mound created on the metal’s surface. Rossi is using these tubercles to
disrupt the regularity of the nickel lattice to increase the strength of
http://ecatreport.com/e-cat/andrea-rossi-on-the-e-cat-part-22
Below follows a stylized E-Cat QA section part 2 /2 from the
interview with Andrea Rossi in Stockholm, 5th July 2011
...Question: Finally, how do you measure the amount of non-vaporized
water in the steam?
Answer: This has
iridescent -- my phonetic spelling terrible this 24 hours, sitting
beside my wife Sondra in Physicians Medical Center Hospital in Santa
Fe, New Mexico, and for another 48 hours, after her successful R hip
replacement yesterday morning, anterior surgery from the front of the
thigh in less than an
People wonder why Levi has not given out more information about the 18-hour
flowing water test. I wish he would publish a detailed report listing the
type of flowmeter and so on. It is annoying to me that he has not.
I expect Levi and the others consider that test irrefutable. So do I. If I
had
Me too
2011/7/12 Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
Been unable to post from home or work since Sunday
There is the following from:
http://ecatreport.com/rossi/andrea-rossi-on-the-e-cat-part-12
Excerpt:
Andrea Rossi on letting some universities test the E-Cat
Rossi went to Uppsala, Sweden the 4th to 5th of July 2011 in
order to enter an agreement with Uppsala University enabling
them to do
damnest nonsense I've ever seen -- I still hope that amid the mass
ascension of varied hot air balloons all over, that at least one
reproducible little CF effect emerges, however humble, as the catalyst
for a mass stampede of scientists... but, mostly, expect irredescent
popping bubbles...
I also had this problem
Peter
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Been unable to post from home or work since Sunday
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
If we apply the logic of the block box to the eCat then it is possible to
argue it is a hoax even if the output is only dry steam.
This is based on the assumption that it is theoretically possible to use a
600-700 watt resistance heater to transform a water flow of 7 liters/hours
Interesting... the page has been removed from 22passi!
Mic
Il giorno 12/lug/2011 20:56, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
Hello group,
It looks like there have been interesting news on the (private) CMNS
mailing list as of late. Passerini in his latest post on his 22passi
Damn, I was hoping my post below would not make it to vortex. ;-)
It was my last foolish effort to persuade myself that Rossi is not a scammer.
I was prepared to let Rossi's past misdeeds remain in the past, however Rossi's
odd behaviour in the present combined with his highly dubious
23 matches
Mail list logo
