Re: [Vo]:MIT Colloquium Report

At 11:20 AM 7/25/2011, Terry Blanton wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo I counted 11 passes ... but .. umm ... NO !

Re: [Vo]:PESN reports that Rossi 1 MW reactor may be self-sustaining

At 02:26 PM 7/25/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: With the electrochemical cells, all else being equal, output is somewhat proportional to input because high input boosts high loading which in turn boosts the heat. But I w

Re: [Vo]:PESN reports that Rossi 1 MW reactor may be self-sustaining

2011/7/25 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax > > This is classic amplification. A small current controls a larger current. A > small heat controls a larger heat. This works with the E-cat (if we accept > that there is excess heat), as long as it is operated in the controllable > region. That kind of effect is c

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli news

There are more reasons for the low profile: - very hard working; - doing advanced and very important cancer research, he has offered to help Scott Chubb- but when we knew about Scott illness it was too late; - health problems (asthma): - rather passive knowledge of the English language; - marginali

Re: [Vo]:PESN reports that Rossi 1 MW reactor may be self-sustaining

Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > With the electrochemical cells, all else being equal, output is somewhat >> proportional to input because high input boosts high loading which in turn >> boosts the heat. But I would not call that amplification. >> > > This is classic amplification. A small current c

Re: [Vo]:MIT Colloquium Report

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote: Is it just me ... or is there an Elephant in the room? > It's a selective attention test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo T

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli news

Peter Gluck wrote: Actually Piantelli has at least 15 publications in which he is the main > leading/author the others being Focardi and analyticians. > And his two patents WO 1995/20816 and WO 2010/058288 > are very professionally written. (two new patents coming soon) > That's true. And yet he

Re: [Vo]:PESN reports that Rossi 1 MW reactor may be self-sustaining

At 02:26 PM 7/22/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote: I think someone here referred to the idea that the device is a sort of energy amplifier. That is, something that uses a flow of energy to tap into a source of energy and extract it at rate depending on input power. I do not think any cold fusion reacto

Re: [Vo]:Uppsala University Denies Rossi Research Agreement

At 10:55 AM 7/22/2011, Joshua Cude wrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Damon Craig <decra...@gmail.com> wrote: The key word is boyancy. What is the densest thing you have ever seen floating in a vapor of steam, Joshua? I'll answer that, I've never seen anythi

Re: [Vo]:MIT Colloquium Report

At 10:41 AM 7/25/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote: At 12:28 PM 7/24/2011, Terry Blanton wrote: The 2011 Cold Fusion/Lattice-Assisted Nuclear Reactions Colloquium at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — Part I http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/LANR2011Colloq.pdf Is it just me ... or i

Re: [Vo]:MIT Colloquium Report

At 12:28 PM 7/24/2011, Terry Blanton wrote: The 2011 Cold Fusion/Lattice-Assisted Nuclear Reactions Colloquium at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — Part I http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/LANR2011Colloq.pdf Is it just me ... or is there an Elephant in the room?

RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Piantelli news

Jones, Thanks for the support, I agree with many of your suggestions for non-nuclear and sub nuclear reactions. My only goal is to have mainstream re-consider a relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect where longer wavelengths are actually subject to Lorentzian contraction not disp

RE: [Vo]:Piantelli news

As a parting shot, so to speak - let me chime in with a couple of comments on Fran's behalf - and others who see cavity-QED as the best answer to understanding the thermal gain in Ni-H (as opposed to the other proposed transmutation reactions, including Piantelli, Focardi etc. since they should exh

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli news

On 2011-07-25 12:15, Akira Shirakawa wrote: Short URL: http://goo.gl/H4vDd (http://www.energeticambiente.it/sistemi-idrogeno-nikel/14742857-novita-cella-piantelli.html) More tidbits: - The older "reactivated" cells that are being tested right now show small excess heat (2-3 times the input e

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli news

Actually Piantelli has at least 15 publications in which he is the main leading/author the others being Focardi and analyticians. And his two patents WO 1995/20816 and WO 2010/058288 are very professionally written. (two new patents coming soon) He had self-sustaining cells years ago. Being a seri

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli news

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote: > - On a theoretical perspective (Piantelli has a mathematical theory which > doesn't require exotic reactions, but that can be explained by current > physical laws and mathematics) protons of 6-7 Mev energy have been confirmed > (in a cloud

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli news

And perhaps, as Peter and I have discussed, there is no Rossi magic sauce after all . . . it's all in the size, shape, cleansing, pressure and temperature of the elements involved. T

RE: [Vo]:Piantelli news

From Akira translation of thread by Roy Virgilio who attended Saturday's LENR talk in Viareggio [snip] Piantelli doesn't use catalysts, at least in the term's literal meaning. His technology is based mainly on nickel preparation, i.e. powder geometry/size and deposition size (in a multilayered m

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli news

Jed sez: ... > Maybe Rossi has nothing to do with it, and Piantelli happened to achieve > commercial-level success now, and he would have gone public even without > Rossi. In a pig's eye. ;-) Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Re: [Vo]:Piantelli news

Akira Shirakawa wrote: Hello group, Here is my translation of several tidbits in a thread in the Italian web forum energeticambiente.it where Roy Virgilio (nicknamed here eroyka. He attended Saturday's LENR talk in Viareggio) will report as time passes news about Piantelli's work. Thanks f

[Vo]:Piantelli news

Hello group, Here is my translation of several tidbits in a thread in the Italian web forum energeticambiente.it where Roy Virgilio (nicknamed here eroyka. He attended Saturday's LENR talk in Viareggio) will report as time passes news about Piantelli's work. I recommend to bookmark that page a

Re: [Vo]:New Sergio Focardi interview

No comments?? If you don't know where to find the report by Dr. G. Levi look here, http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/H-Ni_Fusion/join This Yahoo group has become my own personal blog and rant about this fiasco. I have included first-hand reports and video evidence under the "Files" and "Links"

Re: [Vo]:Uppsala University Denies Rossi Research Agreement

Very well said. There is no obvective measuring stick to measure burden. I was attempting to reveil the hidden hypocracy in the "burden of proof" argument. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > Essentially, "burden" is a social construct, it doesn't exist aside from > hu

Re: [Vo]:Uppsala University Denies Rossi Research Agreement

Joshua Cude, and other astute observerse: We could model an exothermic reactions with unlimited (over the course of the experiment) heat generation as a simple bump function. A simple bump function for this is p = p_o / {1+[(T-T_o)/T_w]^2 }. At T=T_o the power, p is maximal. T_w is the half-wid

Re: [Vo]:Uppsala University Denies Rossi Research Agreement

Yeah, your right. What was I thinking?? My boyancy argument is just wrong. Thank's for straightening that out to me. (And, darn it, don't I look stupid.) As such, I can't see any way to solidly determine if the bulk of the liquid water exits the device suspended in vapor, or simply pours out the