On Sep 2, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Welcome Back Steven!
Yes, welcome back Steven!
No apologies necessary. There’s always next year...
… just glad you and your wife had an enjoyable vacation!
Where ‘bouts is ‘home’ for you two?
And you’ve summed up the Rossi
Am 02.09.2011 22:04, schrieb Horace Heffner:
The above makes no sense to me. Resistor wattage ratings are merely
the maximum wattage that can be put though them without the
expectation they will be destroyed. The power ratings are not used to
compute the power or current through them. If
On Sep 2, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
I have attached a jpg of the inside of the controller box. Sure is
a rat's nest of wires.
Where did you get that? A screen capture from a video? A still image?
- Jed
Yes. I stopped the
I wrote: It is also notable that if the neutral and ground are
shorted together in the blue box, and the ammeter is clamped on the
neutral, that input power estimates could be double that estimated.
That should read: It is also notable that if the neutral and ground
are shorted together in
Am 03.09.2011 14:11, schrieb Horace Heffner:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8QdVwY98E
This should be correct because the current IEC 60446 standard is
neutral-blue, line-brown, and protective-earth-green/yellow.
There appears to be some kind of short white adapter between the wall
On Sep 3, 2011, at 3:34 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 02.09.2011 22:04, schrieb Horace Heffner:
The above makes no sense to me. Resistor wattage ratings are
merely the maximum wattage that can be put though them without the
expectation they will be destroyed. The power ratings are not
Am 03.09.2011 14:48, schrieb Horace Heffner:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resistor
I have had lots of experience burning out resistors. 8^)
I too. Electronics once was my hobby, and still is my day job ;-)
Because I repair, test and develop I have seen burned devices of all
kinds ;-)
On Sep 3, 2011, at 4:24 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:Am 03.09.2011 14:11, schrieb Horace Heffner: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8QdVwY98EThis should be correct because the current IEC60446 standard is neutral-blue,line-brown, and
See:
http://www.xanthipress.gr/eidiseis/politiki/9154-xynidis-kontos-aitisi-ergostasio-syntixi-defkalion-.html
A translation sent to me by someone (maybe done by Google):
No applications for plant in Xanthi
With new negative letters answered, as expected, the question submitted by
the MP
Another evidenche that the whole e-cat story is built over a pile of lies
How long Rossi will last with this joke ?
2011/9/3 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
See:
http://www.xanthipress.gr/eidiseis/politiki/9154-xynidis-kontos-aitisi-ergostasio-syntixi-defkalion-.html
A translation sent
Am 03.09.2011 15:23, schrieb Horace Heffner:
On Sep 3, 2011, at 4:24 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 03.09.2011 14:11, schrieb Horace Heffner:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8QdVwY98E
This should be correct because the current IEC 60446 standard is
neutral-blue, line-brown, and
On Sep 3, 2011, at 7:06 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for all the good information.
There has also been some confusion about the voltage. Sometimes
they say 220V and sometimes 230V.
This is easily explained: In earlier times some countries in europe
used 220V and some used
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Susan Gipp susan.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Another evidenche that the whole e-cat story is built over a pile of lies
How long Rossi will last with this joke ?
Assuming this is a scam, what do you suppose is AR's exit strategy?
T
Very hard to guess. My very very personal opinion is that he really believed
in his discovery. At some time he realized he was wrong and now is trapped
in a huge amount of claims. To sustain these clamis he's forced to add even
more and more. This pile is gonna to collapse pretty soon. Maybe his
When is a PLC not a PLC?
Horace, et al have mentioned the noise generated by the control box.
Originally, we thought AR's mention of a PLC meant programmable logic
controller which made no sense since (holy homonym, batman!) there
was no feedback loop. Now that we find that Red really meant
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Susan Gipp susan.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Very hard to guess. My very very personal opinion is that he really believed
in his discovery. At some time he realized he was wrong and now is trapped
in a huge amount of claims. To sustain these clamis he's forced to add
It's anonymous that never forgets or forgives :). But the anonymous did not
get bothered with this issue, so, people, or the internet, may forget...
From Susan:
Another evidenche that the whole e-cat story is built
over a pile of lies. How long Rossi will last with this joke ?
In the midst of conflicting reports: People always see what they want to
see. They subsequently promote what they want to believe to the rest of the
world.
A quick perusal of Jed's site shows no one seems to have tested Ni/H
stimulation in the sub-megaHertz range. Indeed, I didn't see anything
showing attempts at RF stimulation. Goodness knows that the
wavelength of phonons can certainly exist in this range.
Hey, ecat builder, you wouldn't happen
Terry sez:
A quick perusal of Jed's site shows no one seems to have tested Ni/H
stimulation in the sub-megaHertz range. Indeed, I didn't see anything
showing attempts at RF stimulation. Goodness knows that the
wavelength of phonons can certainly exist in this range.
Hey, ecat builder,
Terry sez:
Hey, surely you took the ET Highway to Rachel and bought a T-Shirt!
http://littlealeinn.com/
Unfortunately, we never made it to Rachel. While driving through Nevada we
stuck to Interstate 80 and then headed North on U.S. hiway 93, at Wells.
Beautiful drive. It was great having an
On Sep 3, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
A quick perusal of Jed's site shows no one seems to have tested Ni/H
stimulation in the sub-megaHertz range. Indeed, I didn't see anything
showing attempts at RF stimulation. Goodness knows that the
wavelength of phonons can certainly exist in
You can get a t-shirt online.
How 'bout a Charm(ing) piccy?
T
Hello group,
Here are new video interviews by Steven Krivit made on June during his
visit in Bologna:
June 15, 2011 Video interview of Andrea Rossi
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II3NxxyxQ0I
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Xe6YoZVupE
Part 3:
The last 20 seconds of part 4 of the interview were amazing! :D
From Daniel
The last 20 seconds of part 4 of the interview were amazing! :D
Yes, it would appear that Rossi changed his mind. ;-) Very mercurial of him.
As previously speculated, it seems to me that putting a cynic (Krivit) and a
showman (Rossi) in the same interview room is like trying to
If I understand the translation, this means that Defkalion never requested
permission to build a plant where it was thought they would. How does this
reflect poorly upon Rossi?
Sent from my iPhone.
On Sep 3, 2011, at 10:56, Susan Gipp susan.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Another evidenche that the
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
The last 20 seconds of part 4 of the interview were amazing! :D
Yes, it would appear that Rossi changed his mind. ;-) Very mercurial of
him.
In the last 20 seconds he says Krivit did a very good job. I agree that he
did, in
Jed sez:
...
I understand Levi's point of view. I don't agree with him completely,
but I get it. It is absurd for Krivit to suggest there is something
unethical or unusual about discussing the data with reporters even
though it is not suitable for a formal paper.
...unless one tends to be a
I commented on possible use of nanopores earlier, and the possible
useful relationship to my theory:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg44662.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg44676.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg44683.html
I
Terry sez:
How 'bout a Charm(ing) piccy?
As you wish.
If this doesn't go thru I'll compress it some more. It's currently 35 kb.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
attachment: CharmCropped1.jpg
I'm not sanguine on any of the theories pppularized so far like
Widom-Larsen, Rossi's theories, Piantelli's, BEC, etc. They've all been
discredited. Ultracold neutrons simply don't work. The effective mass
explanation does not wash. Other of W-L papers are simply not believeable.
If you read
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 7:27 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Terry sez:
How 'bout a Charm(ing) piccy?
As you wish.
If this doesn't go thru I'll compress it some more. It's currently 35 kb.
Oh, that is so cool. Can you attach the full size image as a
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Krivit
often see evidence of foul play or a conspiracy where there is nothing to be
concerned about, or no issue at all, such as the time he misunderstood
scientific notation.
Those isotope analyses cost someone a
On Sep 3, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Joe Catania wrote:
I'm not sanguine on any of the theories pppularized so far like
Widom-Larsen, Rossi's theories, Piantelli's, BEC, etc. They've all
been discredited. Ultracold neutrons simply don't work. The
effective mass explanation does not wash. Other of
Didn’t they change the location to Cypress? Or was that just rumor? I tend to
gloss over the non-technical details.
-mark
From: Charles Hope [mailto:lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 1:42 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Greek press report:
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Didn’t they change the location to Cypress? Or was that just rumor? I tend
to gloss over the non-technical details.
Defkalion Green Technologies is actually a Cypress based company . . .
not Greek.
T
Another possible reason for this 'news' about Defkalion is the following:
The people behind Defkalion never had the money (personally) to do all they
claimed they would do when they signed the agreement with Rossi, however,
they felt they could easily get enough investors interested, so they set
Thanks T!
So, has anyone checked to see if Defkalion has filed an application with the
appropriate agency on Cypress??? Probably not... at least not yet!
Susan,
This is a perfectly clear example of why it's just too soon to be making any
kind of decision, one way or the other, about the E-Cat.
Joe Catania [mailto:zrosumg...@aol.com] wrote:
I'm not sanguine on any of the theories popularized
so far like Widom-Larsen, Rossi's theories, Piantelli's,
BEC, etc. They've all been discredited.
'Discredited' how???
Please don't say, Because they contradict current theories...
Are there any
40 matches
Mail list logo
