On Sep 3, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Joe Catania wrote:
I'm not sanguine on any of the theories pppularized so far like
Widom-Larsen, Rossi's theories, Piantelli's, BEC, etc. They've all
been discredited. Ultracold neutrons simply don't work. The
effective mass explanation does not wash. Other of W-L papers are
simply not believeable. If you read the coverage of Wendt & Irion
you should see what I mean. Debye-Huckel shielding and other
shielding theories are a laugh as well. In short what these
theories seem to require is some way of eliminating or lowering the
Coulomb barrier.
You are preaching to the choir here, especially with regard to Windom-
Larsen theory:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg38261.html
Hagelstein and Chaudhary provided a good critique of WL. However, I
don't see how the above relates to the URLS below, or other material
in this thread.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Horace Heffner"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Radiowave Reactor
I commented on possible use of nanopores earlier, and the
possible useful relationship to my theory:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg44662.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg44676.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg44683.html
I should have included the correction posted below too:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg44845.html
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
