GOD
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 4:42 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:ZPE, DCE, Ni-H, RTS, DLP and other important
three-letter words.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Would you
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
> Based on conversations I've had with him over the years, not in a
> million trillion gillion years would I EVER expect him to, on his own
> reconnaissance, give a single proposal related to a "CF" project the
> light of the day.
>
Such people are ubiquitou
This is a
personal assessment of the issue, and basically nothing new.
So you just
can skip that, without loosing anything.
LENR -for me- is easily the most challenging issue I encountered in my lifetime.
Blacklight
Power, Nanospire, Brillouin, Rossi, Defkalion, the Academics.
There may
be
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Would you-know-who (the original 3-letter word) be pleased?
HEP?
DLH?
PAMD? Wait, no, that's four.
TJB! (moi)
T
Zero Point Energy, aka ZPE - pervades every corner of the universe. It may
play a role in Nickel hydrogen reactions - NiH, in the guise of DCE, or the
Dynamical Casimir Effect. Yet there is still entrenched doubt in the
mainstream that ZPE is really usable in the real world.
A recent experiment, a
Regarding Abd's comment that Hoffman ". . . made some mistakes, no question
about that, but there is nobody on the planet who has not done that."
There are forgivable mistakes, and there are huge mistakes that no one
should make. Suppose Hoffman had written a throwaway sentence or footnote
in his
I've listened to a little of it so far (Valerio Ciampoli of NichEnergy on
behalf of Piantelli at University of Sienna) they are getting very good
results and releasing some excellent data. Most of the slides have been
seen before, but good to have a commentary for it.
http://theatomunexplored.com
Hi
Assume you could get absorption of a laser photon in unranium hexaflouride
based on uranium 235 and not in 238. I can not imagine what I read in
newspapers since the optical excitation would be almost the same.
Rotational and vibrational spectrum however would differ by approximately
1% or less
Spelling error in blog
bussy => busy
Who knows what Rossi is busy doing. I think there was plenty of good
evidence revealed after E&K. Actually, I did not think much of their report.
- Jed
That was a juicy read, Jed.
FWIW, I know someone who's employed at the National Science
Foundation. He's an old Science Fiction fan/friend we've known for
decades. He reviews funding grant proposals for promising new science
projects. It's a position that wields a lot of responsibility and
power.
Hi Group,
Just wanted to update you on my plans to replicate cold fusion claims,
see http://www.fusioncatalyst.org/2012/04/peer-pressure/
Cheers,
Bastiaan.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Lindley is the second dumbest person associated with cold fusion. The late
>> Nate Hoffman was the stupidest, in my opinion.
>>
>
> Yeah, Jed, we discussed the late Nate when we first started corresponding.
> I very much disagree with you about Mr. Hoffman.
Yeah, well
12 matches
Mail list logo