If that is true, then it follows that the Earth is doing work on
I think that the remainder of your sentence was cut off here Harry.
Harry
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:41 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
If you are referring to my statement about the magnet and steel, I am
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:01 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
If that is true, then it follows that the Earth is doing work on
I think that the remainder of your sentence was cut off here Harry.
By analogy with your steel/magnet analysis the Earth is doing work on a
falling
Is earths gravity getting weaker by an apple falling
It is now earth plus an apple, and if enough apples fell, the gravity would
increase further, eventually measurably increasing earths gravity, and
creating an apple sauce layer of course.
And ultimately an very appley black hole.
On Mon,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:01 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:41 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
If you are referring to my statement about the magnet and steel, I am not
confusing them. The force being applied to the steel is attempting to
That is a good thought Harry. It would be true if gravity behaved the same way
as magnetism. In the case of gravity additional matter that is allowed to
become attached to the initial body behaves in exactly the same way as the
original matter. The larger net body generates a larger gravity
I do not believe that Rossi would hand over a reactor for testing to
professors unless they have agreed when they will report their results. I
do not believe he has had no contact with these professors. This is silly.
Rossi micromanages all access to his technology. He would not even let me
use
The magnetization energy of neo magnets is small, hardly worth considering
as a power source.
I think it's about the energy recovered from just one traverse of a magnetic
material from infinity to contact.
It's related to the area inside the hysteresis curve. I have the figures
somewhere,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_energy
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.
hoyt-stea...@cox.netwrote:
The magnetization energy of neo magnets is small, hardly worth considering
as a power source.
** **
I think it's about the energy recovered from just one
In a personal correspondence, Y.E. Kim confirms that this BEC development
gives his theory yet another leg up.
Yes, high temperature BEC (HT-BEC) is possible with interacting Bosons
which is capable of forming a BEC cluster.
The arguments for requiring the very low T to form a BEC are
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. hoyt-stea...@cox.net wrote:
The magnetization energy of neo magnets is small, hardly worth considering
as a power source.
This means the energy needed to make the domains line up, right?
- Jed
Yes.
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 2:10 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Yildiz motor in Geneva -- ran 5.5 hours then broke down
Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. hoyt-stea...@cox.net wrote:
The magnetization energy of neo magnets is
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/indeng.html
That gives the formula for a magnetic field's energy density (energy per
volume) as:
½B^2/μ
If, as our expert claims, the energy is basically in the noise, one
should be able to come up with a simple calculation of an upper bounds
I was thinking about the energy that can be extracted by allowing many pieces
of steel to slowly come into contact with a magnet which most likely would not
demagnetize the original magnet. I think it is actually a way to redirect the
external field.
I had an interesting thought. Take two
If you trust wikipedia on stuff like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium_magnet#Description
Therefore, as the maximum energy density is proportional to Js2, this
magnetic phase has the potential for storing large amounts of magnetic
energy (BHmax ~ 512 kJ/m3 or 64 MG·Oe), considerably
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wD6gT3QIlpY
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/papers/jm-rice-report-28april-2008.pdf
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/papers/Exploration_of_BH_Time_Effects_STRN-TR-APR
-0001-0001.pdf
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/papers/asymmetry-and-energy-in-magnetic-systems-r
A cubic centimeter would have 512 kj/m^3 /100 m^3 = .516 joules. This
equates to .516 newton-meters for a magnet 1 cm cube. It appears that the
force would be rather intense if most of this energy was concentrated within
the closest centimeter from the magnet.
Obviously Yildiz does not
CoE would still apply in this case
the total energy before = total energy after
energy the substance = energy of substance + energy of escaping neutrinos.
A cooling substance that violated CoE wouldn't be producing enough
particles or radiation to balance the equation.
Harry
On Sat, Apr 13,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:24 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
That means he has a whopping 512kJ to run down during his 5 hours. This
calculates out to:
512kJ;5hour?W
(512 * [kilo*joule]) * (5 * hour)^-1 ? watt
= 28.44 W
That's just about enough to run a little fan.
Good point Eric. I saw a short video and the fan blade was tiny. About the
size of a large model plane prop. I would guess a couple of watts, but it is
difficult to determine.
We need good data to evaluate the Yildiz device.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:10:00 PM
Good point Eric. I saw a short video and the fan blade was tiny.
About the size of a large model plane prop. I would guess a couple
of watts, but it is difficult to determine.
We need good data to evaluate
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 14 Apr 2013 18:37:33 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I have always been suspicious of why a photon of light interacts with only one
electron when the wavelength of the light is many times larger than the atom
that contains that electron in orbit. Why is
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 14 Apr 2013 18:49:20 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I am having a difficult time judging the amount of energy stored in these
magnets. I recall almost having a finger removed when holding a piece of
steel near a powerful rare earth magnet. The force
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:56:56 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
CoE would still apply in this case
the total energy before = total energy after
energy the substance = energy of substance + energy of escaping neutrinos.
A cooling substance that violated CoE wouldn't be
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:51 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:56:56 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
CoE would still apply in this case
the total energy before = total energy after
energy the substance = energy of substance + energy of escaping
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sun, 14 Apr 2013 18:37:33 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I have always been suspicious of why a photon of light interacts with only one
electron when the wavelength of the light is many times larger than the atom
that contains that electron in orbit. Why is
25 matches
Mail list logo
