Unfortunately, even though Y E Kim engaged with me in the past, he seems to
have chosen not to engage on this particular subject, wherein his theory is
given a leg up.
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
May 27 (10 days ago)
to Yeong
Hello Dr. Kim:
It would seem that your BEC theory has gotten
This very new paper is a great find for LENR. It is another piece in the
very complicated LENR puzzle.
Super-absorption in a LENR system is what a chain reaction is in a nuclear
system. As infrared light (photons) aka heat is absorbed by a system of
dipoles, the energy is increased and the
No dear Mark, this is a modest blog, an average of 150 views per day
I don't want to be popular. I started the blog on 15 Dec 2010.
Had over 10,000 views in July 2012 when I published an interview about
DGT's scientific- technological principles and last month.
The main idea I am promoting- LENR
Thanks for the clarification.
-mi
From: Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 11:42 PM
To: VORTEX
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change
No dear Mark, this is a modest blog, an average of 150 views per day
I don't want to
Hi,
On 7-6-2013 4:46, Eric Walker wrote:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Danny Ross Lunsford
antimatte...@yahoo.com mailto:antimatte...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is there some way to be a part of this that does not involve
dozens of email messages per waking day to my account? Is there
not
Great interview Peter (and response to Mary). Thank you for sharing with us. As
i started learning about the LENR field Dr. Kim's papers were some of the first
I ever came across and as an amateur I did not fully comprehend a majority of
what i read but never the less enjoyed reading them all
Yeong is a great scientist and he is very generous and friendly. And he
has great courage and takes responsibilty- he is an authority in two fields
of physics and even more. You can now find all his papers at the iste of
his University mentioned in the Interview.. His presenation at ICCF-18 will
On Thursday June 6th Harry said
Ok, I realise why we diverge in our approaches to your model. I don't start
with the assumption that the lattice is in a state of thermal equilibrium.
I assume the presence of thermal fluxes and perhaps other energy fluxes
as well which can do small amounts of
Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
I'm using ThunderBird (a sisterprogram of FireFox) for managing my
mailboxeS and it allows me to filter on several different aspects (e.g
sender, subject etc.) and it keeps things a lot better manageable.
I use Thunderbird too. I like it. But I
This is pretty good.
http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/interest-in-lenr-device-resurges-as-independent-report-is-released-2013-06-07
- Jed
Why is it pretty good? This is old news already...
2013/6/7 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
This is pretty good.
http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/interest-in-lenr-device-resurges-as-independent-report-is-released-2013-06-07
- Jed
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is it pretty good? This is old news already...
Good in the sense that the author did not attack or belittle cold fusion,
and he did not quote Krivit or some astrophysicist saying cold fusion is
impossible. There was this nonsense:
in 1989,
Greetings Vortex,
Not sure why we have not seen the prototype, but
LENR just might be useful:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=worlds-first-flying-saucer
Respectfully,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
Doylestown, PA
The Mössbauer effect has been observed in Nickel-61.
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v121/i5/p1344_1
Although this nickel isotope is not Rossi's chosen one for gain, there is a
fair chance that treated nickel would be enriched in Ni-61 by the same
process that Rossi uses to enrich in Ni-62.
Peter,
Kim says Huizenga's three miracles are:
(1) suppression of the DD Coulomb repulsion (Gamow factor) * *
(2) no production of nuclear products (D+D → n+ 3He, etc.)
(3) the violation of the momentum conservation in free space
In other places I have seen Huizenga three miracles written like
are'nt gamma the way to compensate momentum ?
and neutron the expected nuclear products?
by the way I appreciate the way yeong kim explain why lattice is not free
space :
even though I clearly recognized that the conventional nuclear scattering
theory at positive energies cannot directly be
Probbably Huizenga himself has used different variants,
this is like folklore. I confees I have not read the Huizenga
and Taubes books, have seen them when visting at Gene Mallove's
office in 1998 but I was not too interested- they were discussed over and
over.
Peter
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:15
Lou,
I also think the frequency of photons emitted in an NAE are
going to be frequency shifted proportional to their contracted state. In my old
animation circa 2010 I show a red photon for H2 disassociation outside casimir
plates while f/H2 photons emitted inside plates are
In contrast, the only miracle required for a version of the Rydberg redundancy
explanation (redundant electron ground state) is that it happens at all… since
everything else is standard physics.
… or stated another way – it would be a miracle in itself if the experimental
proof offered
Jones
Does Rydberg redundancy explanation (redundant electron ground
state) = IRH?
Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 2:24 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change
In
Yes.
From: Roarty, Francis X
Does Rydberg redundancy explanation (redundant electron ground state) = IRH?
Fran
From: Jones Beene
In contrast, the only miracle required for a version of the Rydberg redundancy
explanation (redundant electron ground state) is that it happens at
Either Kim incorrectly quotes Huizenga's book or the second ( and more
popular?)
version misrepresents Huizenga's three miracles.
Somebody with a copy of Huizenga's book could this settle this issue
quickly.
Harry
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Not only do the photons and dipoles couple very strongly in the lattice,
they also couple to the quantum vacuum as evidenced by the appearance
of *vacuum
Rabi splitting *in the spectroscopic analysis of the associated EMF photon
radiation.The appearance of virtual dipoles drive the dipoles in the
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 12:29:30 PM
Somebody with a copy of Huizenga's book could this settle this issue
quickly.
I have an early edition (he revised it later) but it's in my office and I
won't be there until early next week.
References:
http://phys.org/news/2013-05-einstein-spooky-action-common-large.html
*Einstein's 'spooky action' common in large quantum systems, mathematicians
find*
If you like mathematics that can choke an elephant try this as follows:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1106.2264v3.pdf
*ENTANGLEMENT
Axil, I agree there is coupling to the vacuum, and more importantly it is not
the standard coupling already encompassed by our physical laws and reflected in
the periodic chart. IMHO most energy transactions between the vacuum plane
and physical plane occur far below the subatomic particle
Greetings All,
Not sure if this was previously covered:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/06/professor-yeong-kim-reports-witnessing-positive-defkalion-test/
Respectfully,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:15:46 -0400:
Hi,
If particle emission doesn't relieve the excited nucleus of its energy (#2),
then some other means is required. If that is not gamma emission (and the gammas
are clearly absent), then the assumption appears to be that the
some comments in a letter by Kim
(quoted here
http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?1595-Dr-Yeong-Kim-and-Defkalionp=5082#post5082
)
and we realize that DGT and Kim are already in contact since 2012.
We discover Kim opinion on Hadjichristos.
However, the significances of both papers [1,2]
Here's a new version. The only significant change is in the components section:
http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_hotcat_may2003_spice_130607.php#components
Also .
http://lenr.qumbu.com/web_hotcat_pics/130601_levi_02B.png
Is it my imagination, or is the November hotcat SAGGING in the middle?
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 1:30:54 PM
Subject: [Vo]:ENTANGLEMENT THRESHOLDS FO
References:
http://phys.org/news/2013-05-einstein-spooky-action-common-large.html
Einstein's 'spooky action' common in large quantum systems,
mathematicians find
I will comply with your formatting requirements in the production of future
posts like this one.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 1:30:54 PM
Subject: [Vo]:ENTANGLEMENT THRESHOLDS FO
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 2:58:37 PM
I will comply with your formatting requirements in the production of
future posts like this one.
I didn't mean any disrespect ... it's just that I rushed off into that rather
... tangled paper, looking for an elephant
On Fri June 7th Axil said [snip] Why does a Ni/H reactor form a Bose-Einstein
condensate throughout its entire volume? STANIS LAW J. SZAREK provides the
answer; the dipoles throughout the reactor are forced to become totally
entangled when the percentage of dipole entanglement exceeds 20%.
Francis,
In this current investigation of LENR it is difficult to understand what is
its cause is and what its effects are.
The breakdown of how matter and energy really work may not be a cause of
LENR but just one of the many effects of the ultimate cause.
What happens when a hydrogen atom
If He took off by itself, how fast would it be moving?
Detecting and measuring the speed of He particles
would be a way checking for a conservation of momentum violation.
harry
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 7 Jun 2013
Wanted, dead or alive (not dead and alive)
http://www.wm.edu/news/stories/2013/scientific-american-article-explains-a-
way-to-resolve-quantum-state-paradoxes-123.php
The weird part is this: As long as the box is sealed, you have to
consider the cat to be both dead and alive. That’s what life is
Teaser. Do you have a subscription?
No, sorry.
I first saw it on the newsstand and just flipped through it.
Harry
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Teaser. Do you have a subscription?
From pesn.com ---
JCF13 - Proc. of the 13th Meeting of Japan CF Research Soc.,
December 8 - 9, 2012 - WincAichi, Nagoya, Japan
Japan CF-Research Society
http://www.jcfrs.org/file/jcf13-proceedings.pdf
Previous JCF Proceeding at -
http://www.jcfrs.org/proc_jcf.html
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 12:29:30 PM
Somebody with a copy of Huizenga's book could this settle this issue
quickly.
I have an early edition (he revised it later) but it's in
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
If He took off by itself, how fast would it be moving?
Detecting and measuring the speed of He particles
would be a way checking for a conservation of momentum violation.
As an amateur following the field, this is my
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. Take your time, but it would be nice to read the source.
The headings that set out the three miracles in his book are (pp. 111-13):
1. Fusion-rate miracle
2. Branching-ratio miracle
3.
I wrote:
For (2), he's talking about how you'd have to significantly decrease the
rate of the d+d→3He+p and d+d→t+n branches, which are normally ~50 percent
each
Typo -- that should read, d+d→3He+n and d+d→t+p branches.
Eric
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 7 Jun 2013 21:40:15 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
QBism does away with such head-shaking weirdness, von Baeyer writes, by
dealing with the wave function, a mathematical expression of objects in
the quantum state. Traditional explanations treat the wave function as
From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 8:21:55 PM
From pesn.com ---
JCF13 - Proc. of the 13th Meeting of Japan CF Research Soc.,
December 8 - 9, 2012 - WincAichi, Nagoya, Japan
Japan CF-Research Society
http://www.jcfrs.org/file/jcf13-proceedings.pdf
Steady progress,
We are going on this Scientific Way for 24= years and very interesting
things were discovered. Howvever if we take in consideration that CF
was seen from its very start as a potential new energy source, then
Kitamura's way is not the good way. It is a very long way and if we enjoy
more traveling
47 matches
Mail list logo
