On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
They originally built (or bought, from an impoverished
> inventor) a small device - which showed a possible gravity anomaly (or
> something like the Aspden effect) but did not self-power reliably. Then ...
> in the way that rich industrialists of
I wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:36 AM, wrote:
>
> Surely that depends on the distribution of the radioisotope within the
>> metal?
>> Since you created this hypothetical substance, it's up to you to say
>> whether or
>> not that's the case. ;)
>>
>
> No doubt. :) But for my hypothetical subs
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:36 AM, wrote:
Surely that depends on the distribution of the radioisotope within the
> metal?
> Since you created this hypothetical substance, it's up to you to say
> whether or
> not that's the case. ;)
>
No doubt. :) But for my hypothetical substance, I will choose
FYI:
Mpemba Paradox Revisited -- Numerical Reinforcement –>
http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.1014
- Mark Jurich
James Bowery wrote:
You miss the point of my question which is in the word "monstrosity".
>
I did not miss that. My guess is they were hoping to produce more energy.
> Even they admit they don't need a factory-sized monstrosity to demonstrate
> the effect.
>
Yeah. I do not understand what it
You miss the point of my question which is in the word "monstrosity".
Even they admit they don't need a factory-sized monstrosity to demonstrate
the effect.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> James Bowery wrote:
>
>
>> So why would anyone invest millions to build such a mon
Hi,
Consider
Hy2 + D => 4Li* (Hy2 is a severely shrunken Hydrino molecule)
followed by 4Li* decay (HL ~ 8E-23 seconds):-
4Li* => 3He + p + 5.49 MeV
The reaction eats up whatever D is available, and converts it into 3He and a
fast proton. Because the decay reaction is fast, no prompt ga
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
Looks promising.
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36813/MassFlowCalo
rimetryAbstract.pdf
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36813/MassFlowCalo
rimetryPresentation.pdf
p. 19 shows 19 or 20 W excess. 20
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Tue, 3 Dec 2013 19:42:02 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:56 PM, wrote:
>
>Sounds pretty good doesn't it? However consider the fact that gamma emitting
>> radioisotopes are common, even in solids, so apparently the coupling
>> mechanism
>> that mig
>From Arnold: Hey, check out da blog, he thinks he found ISON and da Dark
Matta
http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/12/04/meet-ison-the-cusp-of-the-problem/
Our flintstones model of the universe needs to go in the trash can.
Stewart
Looks promising.
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36813/MassFlowCalorimetryAbstract.pdf
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36813/MassFlowCalorimetryPresentation.pdf
p. 19 shows 19 or 20 W excess. 20 W is a lot more than they saw
previously. The m
Jones Beene wrote:
Well, it is not clear how much "defeating CoE" - merely as
> an intellectual endeavor - is worth. A lot, for sure - but probably not in
> the billions... unless, that is, ultimate economics are favorable at some
> scale.
>
Gene Mallove said "there is no such th
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131203161549.htm
Well, it is not clear how much "defeating CoE" - merely as
an intellectual endeavor - is worth. A lot, for sure - but probably not in
the billions... unless, that is, ultimate economics are favorable at some
scale.
It's all about economics in the end, and that coul
James Bowery wrote:
> So why would anyone invest millions to build such a monstrosity even if it
> worked? (We'll ignore the fact that it violates violate known
> interpretations of physical theory out of respect for the Enlightenment
> principle of evidence over theory.)
>
You would invest mi
There has been a good deal of discussion on this forum:
http://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/viewforum.php
Use the search feature. BTW, you will find a former Vort there, Frank
Grimer. I think he believes one might find overunity in second and
third order mechanical motion.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at
16 matches
Mail list logo
