On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
If it can be commercialized, and it
doesn't cause cancer within a 2 km radius or beckon forth giant sea
monsters,
Hah! Release the Kraken!
http://elmisa.deviantart.com/art/Kraken-v2-424365880
From Craig:
I know this is off topic, but I thought it might be interesting to some
of you. It's a unique Bitcoin transaction of which I had never
considered. It demonstrates some of the power that Bitcoin may bring to
people.
One reason for the scientist, like for Elforsk boss, is not taking risk to
be wrong but very probably they already know what they are (right or
wrong), and that they did not take the opportunity to flee the debate is an
information.
If the test was a flop, the boss of Elforsk would have said : I
The oddest thing about this new affair it is that ecat's report should be
released soon... So, it's almost like this scam calling was done on
purpose, right before its release.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Yeah, crazy stuff. I'm increasing the % here of Rossi being real to 40%
though on the account of the scientists speaking out. They sound confident.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
The oddest thing about this new affair it is that ecat's report
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I sincerely doubt that a journal will pick it up, so it will most likely
be self-published (again) and generally ignored (again).
I think there is no chance any journal will publish this. Self-publication
is fine. It will be ignored, but that does not
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, crazy stuff. I'm increasing the % here of Rossi being real to 40%
though on the account of the scientists speaking out. They sound confident.
They are confident, but we cannot be sure they have a positive result this
time. Even assuming
A reasonable point. They may report high, uncontrollable COP. The
isotopic analysis should stlll be be interesting though, if they actually
did it.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, crazy stuff.
I agree with having an interested public. I also think that having a highly
interested stakeholder could prove useful in the political realm. To that end I
have been trying to get the trade association for the drought ravaged central
California growers interested. If the coastal cities had
Someone may have hacked the domain server. I was just on the phone with the
domain people (Hyperstreet.com) for a half-hour. They have no idea what
happened. I think they suspect an attack.
Whois reports:
Domain Status: clientHold
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status:
Hi all
On the matter of scepticism:
No one is denying people the right to be scientifically sceptical of LENR
but to be a sceptical scientist you must conform to the Galileo Test and
put your eye to the telescope.
For the radio reporter to speak out against a report that has not been
published,
The Galileo Test cannot be one on the Ni/H reactor. Its design and
operating principles are top secret. We are at the religion stage currently
and the builders of the Ni/H reactors want to keep it that way for as long
as possible.
When asked :how does it work the builders will then ask you tell
I do not recall seeing reference to this earlier. Rossi stated in his Journal
that he uses AC source power to control the ECAT. According to his words it
would be inefficient to convert the source power into DC when the heating
apparently is the main function of the current. This suggests
Hi all
In reply to Axil Axil
The point I was making was clearly about the the lack of scientific basis
of the Radio Reporter critique of a third party report that has not yet
been published, so hence no basis on which to make their critique and about
the use of ad homonym attacks rather than
We're at the magic stage.
Science, anyone skilled in the art can reproduce it.
Magic, only some skilled in the art can reproduce it.
Religion, no one can reproduce it.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The Galileo Test cannot be one on the Ni/H reactor.
It does not imply anything about other sources of magnetic fields.
Anything new from Rossi on magnetic fields produced by his invention?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:57 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I do not recall seeing reference to this earlier. Rossi stated in his
Journal
I have not seen any reference from Rossi about the operation of his device in a
long time. I suspect that the new owners of his technology want to keep trade
secrets as long as possible. Rossi once was far more open to questions.
He has not spoken of magnetic fields as related to his ECAT to
I like that
On Wednesday, June 4, 2014, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
We're at the magic stage.
Science, anyone skilled in the art can reproduce it.
Magic, only some skilled in the art can reproduce it.
Religion, no one can reproduce it.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Axil
That is a good description of the status!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Jun 4, 2014 12:00 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish Professors Chomping at the Bit
We're at the magic stage.
Science, anyone skilled
Dear James
I think this list is not complete:
*Technology*- anybody paying for it and respecting
some simple instructions can, use it.
Unfortunately skilled in the art has to be defined
in each case.
Technology is much more than applied science.
Peter
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:00 PM, James
From: David Roberson
I have not seen any reference from Rossi about the operation of his device
in a long time. I suspect that the new owners of his technology want to
keep trade secrets as long as possible. Rossi once was far more open to
questions.
BTW - here is a point that needs
Furthermore, pursuant to the new US patent laws, any technical tidbits that
these builders release to the public cannot be protected by patent.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:05 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I have not seen any reference from Rossi about the operation of his
device
Peter, I agree with what you said with two exceptions:
1) Technology does not necessarily imply money. There are huge amounts of
open free technology -- particularly in software.
2) skilled in the art has a legal definition as a consequence of patent
law's definition of disclosure. Although it
Unless they've already submitted a patent app for them.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Furthermore, pursuant to the new US patent laws, any technical tidbits
that these builders release to the public cannot be protected by patent.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at
This was caused by ICANN's new domain verification process. This new
process seems to be brainchild of some bureaucrat with too much time on his
hands. It is a laff riot.
- Jed
Dear James,
your definition is perfect, thanks
1) is irrelevant THIS technology implies money, a lot, in and out.
2) re patents, know-how I am speaking from practice. Rarely patents are
sold without know how.
Peter
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:35 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
At 08:40 AM 6/4/2014, you wrote:
The Galileo Test cannot be one on the Ni/H reactor. Its design and
operating principles are top secret. We are at the religion stage
currently and the builders of the Ni/H reactors want to keep it that
way for as long as possible.
You can put your eye to the
H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you view the decision to not build a higher sea wall?
Unfortunate. But understandable. The previous tsunami of this magnitude
occurred in 869 AD. There were records of it, and even man-markers of the
high water mark. But I think experts assumed the
about the problem some people have with the unknown is fascinating.
Am I a genius in understanding what is a black box test ?
in assuming that if some heat above any known chemical process, above the
theoretical chemistry limit, thus there is something ... interesting to
look further ?
It is the
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
about the problem some people have with the unknown is fascinating.
I think that is the core problem. Fear of novelty is common in many
animals. It is a healthy evolved response, but it gets in the way of
science.
Am I a genius in understanding
To Alain and Jed,
I think you guys are on to what I call the difference between an
entrepreneur (a very misused word) and not an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurs
are fearless about new things. However to be a successful entrepreneur you
need to be logical and the hardest - You have to accept the simple
Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com wrote:
I think you guys are on to what I call the difference between an
entrepreneur (a very misused word) and not an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurs
are fearless about new things. However to be a successful entrepreneur you
need to be logical and the
Jed,
I've just read your modus operandi, and again I find myself wanting to say:
Have you considered putting together a historical account of the Saga of Cold
Fusion? You've already written a book 10 years ago on how Cold Fusion has the
potential to transform the world for the better.
Greetings Vortex,
http://phys.org/news/2014-06-quantum-criticality-class-materials.html
Ad Astra,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
But you don't increase the % on the thread where you introduced that
practice. So I'm constrained to decrease my ASSessment of an ASSurance
that Blaze will pull his head out of his ASinine hind quarters down to
7.61%, taking into account the Coriolis effect on this year's election
cycle. At
Here's how I think it will go down based upon long term observation and
Rossi's hints.
It will be a positive TIP report. The TIP report will be ignored in the
industry.
Rossi IH will announce that they intend to demo to their patent
application which was denied recently due to being impossible,
IMHO, highly correlated electron systems are the bedrock upon which LENR is
built.
The complicated interplay between magnetism, temperature, condensed matter,
electrons, and quantum mechanics produces many strange effects including
superconductivity and the hydrino ( fractional orbitons).
Kevin,
Lighten up. Cardinal rule here is no personal attacks…
You’ve got your opinion, he’s got his… and you know what they say about
opinions… they’re like ASS*oles… everyone’s got one, and noone wants to look at
the other person’s.
-Mark Iverson
From: Kevin O'Malley
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:45 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
Kevin,
Lighten up.
***NO.
Ever since Blaze first showed up, he's been trying to steal money from your
pocket and every other vortician's pocket.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg83682.html
39 matches
Mail list logo
