Axil,
Stay on point.
Who would be held responsible for bringing Russia down? Whose fault is it?
Putin or Rossi?
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
1: There is no such things as probability, things either happen or they
don't. Rossi either IS real, or he is NOT real..
There is no such thing as probability in reality.
I see..
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:12 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze's ego is astounding, thinking that
I guess what your'e really saying is that God Does Not Play Dice.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
1: There is no such things as probability, things either happen or they
don't. Rossi either IS real, or he is NOT real..
There is no such thing as
The game changer is not Rossi but Black Light Power’s SunCell technology which
is now taking shape. Readers of Vo have been put off by seemingly wild
exaggerations in BLP’s press release and a studied reluctance to understand BLP
because the technology is so different from ’cold fusion’ or
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com wrote:
The game changer is not Rossi but Black Light Power’s SunCell technology
which is now taking shape. Readers of Vo have been put off by seemingly
wild exaggerations in BLP’s press release
I wasn't put off by wild
Well, the great about BLP is that they make Rossi look credible.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com wrote:
The game changer is not Rossi but Black Light Power’s SunCell technology
which is now taking shape. Readers of Vo have been put off by seemingly
wild
How fast could cold fusion progress? I took a graphic picture of technological
change now in progress.
What was once of great value, like a projection TV, is now just junk.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/TechnologyChange.jpg
enjoy
Frank Znidarsic
Well I worded that strongly to drive home a point, we often hide our
ignorance in the talk of probability.
There are 4 domains in which we apply probability.
1: Things which are set and we are ignorant of, no actual element of chance
exist, such as with Rossi.
2: Macro chance, things that we
I believe it is fair to say that in quantum mechanics probabilities
actually exist in the physical sense (assuming the theories are correct).
In the macroscopic world, probabilities do not exist in the same sense that
atoms exist, or energy, or states of matter. Instead, probabilities are
measure
In the macroscopic world, probabilities do not exist in the same sense
that atoms exist, or energy, or states of matter.
I suspect Schrodinger's cat would disagree with this statement. The
microscopic significantly influences the macroscopic world.
The eCat is a perfect example of this.
Blaze, a fine verbal joust.
But you must admit it is not even close to reality.
Now you are engaging in a factious argument, Rossi and his eCat are not
wave functions yet to be collapsed.
Good comedy, but if I were to take you at your word, I would consider you
needing to be picked up by some
I just saw the following discussion on Rossi’ blog:
Joseph Fine
June 8th, 2014 at 8:41 AM
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Below is a link to an article from eurekalert on the synthesis of Nickel Carbon
Fullerenes. The lead author (‘Andrey Popov’) is not sure of the practical
applications of this
From: Bob Cook
I just saw the following discussion on Rossi’ blog: [snip] a link to an article
from eurekalert on the synthesis of Nickel Carbon Fullerenes.
Hi Bob,
What would be the theory of why this is preferable for LENR to a simple mix of
nickel nanopowder and either CNT or
Everything in the universe is a wave function waiting to be collapsed.
This is how the universal simulator avoids pointless CPU processing.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:59 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze, a fine verbal joust.
But you must admit it is not even close to reality.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Bob Cook
I just saw the following discussion on Rossi’ blog: [snip] a link to an
article from eurekalert on the synthesis of Nickel Carbon Fullerenes.
Hi Bob,
What would be the theory of why this is
Wrong.
Rossi has either found a real effect, or he hasn't.
If he hasn't, then we can assume that there is no way to get results just
like he claimed in the fashion he claimed.
It would be odd to say the least to propose that he is faking something
that could be made to work with a tiny tweak.
Rossi has either found a real effect, or he hasn't.
***Nope. Not even Pons Fleischmann can lay claim to having found the
effect. What Rossi found was a way to get more consistent replications by
separating out H2 gas into monoatomic hydrogen gas before it gets loaded
into a nickel chamber.
You are back at he level of human ignorance though.
Sure, maybe Rossi doesn't know for sure his effect is really overunity.
Maybe he doesn't know it is extraordinary.
Or just some false positive.
BUT the effect is either real, or not real.
It doesn't have a chance one way or the other then
The discussion indicated that the new substance had unusual magnetic properties
and could potentially harbor lots of H (or D.) If the magnetic field was
sufficient to allow the formation of Cooper pairs of H ions, the formation of
D and hence He may be possible with the distribution of
I neglected to add my favored coupling mechanism of spin being the method of
fractionation of the energy to the fullerene matrix.
Bob
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 3:42 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Bob Cook
I just
Terry--I wondered the same thing. I assumed they were related and the a good
potential use was in the gravity shielding arena.
Bob
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Terry Blanton
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 4:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:42 PM,
Jones-
Another item relative to the theory would be that the larger structure of the
Fullerene relative the carbon tube would be a larger population of H within the
structure and a greater probability of interaction. The largeness of the QM
system may make fractionation more probable also.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe it is fair to say that in quantum mechanics probabilities
actually exist in the physical sense (assuming the theories are correct).
This is the predominant interpretation of quantum mechanics, but one that
is
The de Broglie-Bohm theory is now considered by some to be a valid
challenge to the prevailing orthodoxy of the Copenhagen Interpretation, but
it remains controversial. It is both realistic and deterministic and has
nothing to do with probability. It has no implications for multiple
universes and
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
You are back at he level of human ignorance though.
***What does such an expression even mean? You could easily claim it means
so many different things. In context, it appears that you think I'm saying
Rossi is ignorant,
Kevin, I can only assume you have misunderstood what I was saying.
Earlier you said: Not even Pons Fleischmann can lay claim to having found
the effect.
Which sound to me something like the great (not even) PF can't claim they
definitively had a real effect, so Neither can Rossi be rightly
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:53 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin, I can only assume you have misunderstood what I was saying.
Earlier you said: Not even Pons Fleischmann can lay claim to having
found the effect.
Which sound to me something like the great (not even) PF can't
Kevin, I can only assume you have misunderstood what I was saying.
***It would appear that you misunderstood what I was saying.
28 matches
Mail list logo
