*Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a physical phenomenon in which nuclei
in a magnetic field absorb and re-emit electromagnetic radiation. This
energy is at a specific resonance frequency which depends on the strength
of the magnetic field and the magnetic properties of the isotope of the
atoms;
Now, have you got some bitcoins to back your belief?
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for posting this. I signed up at betmoose.com and set up 3 more
contracts to trade on.
https://www.betmoose.com/bet/cyclone-po ... rt-out-257
deuterium is a NMR active isotope an cannot participate in the LENR process.
This still leaves open the possibility that a compound containing deuterium
with 0 total spin(NMR inactive) may be LENR active.
Could it be that over these 25 years, people have be under an fusion
inspired illusion that
A cooper pairing of deuterium nuclei with total spin of 0 might be LENR
active.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
deuterium is a NMR active isotope an cannot participate in the LENR
process.
This still leaves open the possibility that a compound containing
What about Naturwissenschaften, or Jounal of electroanalythical chemistry ?
If I was the LENR community i would ask all scientist to boycott nature,
Science and alike, for publication and for citation... that would be fair.
Scientist will quickly and rationally know that if they try to publish
From: alain.coetm...@gmail.com
What about Naturwissenschaften, or Journal of
electroanalythical chemistry ?
FWIW an article turned up on J. Elec. Chem. which could have some relevance
to LENR. Check the latest issue for: “Electrochemical
Lennart,
I agree with your point that it will probably take a commercial unit to
convince the pathological skeptics.
Rossi has said so all along and I gather is now working on a 1 MW
commercial installation and says it may be ready for viewing this year.
I agree with you Kevin.
Just keep in mind that sometimes there is too much risk and it is reasons
to take what I say as another factor.
I think that given the opportunity a few people will take advantage in a
small scale - totally of no significance. Maybe $thousands.
That is something we cannot
To put this topic under its own subject heading …
An article turned up (“before its time”, literally) in Journal of
Electroanalytical Chemistry, Volume 727, 1 August 2014, Pages 53–58 which
could have relevance to LENR insofar as understanding the mechanics for gain
in some types of experiments –
*Piantelli has used both deuterium and nitrogen gas as a means to stop a
LENR reaction. Both are NMR active and would be expected to suppress the
LENR reaction. DGT has used Argon as a suppressant for their LENR reaction.
Argon is NMR quiet and yet does not support the LENR reaction; the reason
is
One of the challenges that the testers of the Rossi reactor will have will
be the intense EMF that radiates from the reactor.
Due to NMR effects, this EMF radiation will blow out the instrumentation
and communication equipment within some meters of the reactor. The Reactor
might take out the
One of the ways to capure the waste energy RF produced by the NiH reactor
is to incorporate a rectenna into the reactor design. This rectenna should
be a wide band receiver to capture the full power radiation from the RF
band. This wide band power capture may be done using fractal design.
A
Axil, I am sure it is my lack of understanding. However, I cannot see why
it is so hard to measure input and output of the Ecat.
I am fine receiving a correction of my simple thinking as I am sure I am
missing something. I do not know anything about the RF situation and if I
had the thought (or
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
What about Naturwissenschaften, or Jounal of electroanalythical chemistry ?
They have not published anything in a long time, as far as I know.
OFF WITH THEIR HEAD
like after occupation and collaboration, those who collaborated with the
invader,
Any report on the before-and-after products is going to raise more
(pathoskeptical) questions than it answers.
I would prefer it if they just covered the black-box calorimetry, as
soon as possible, with a second paper on products when it's ready.
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I would prefer it if they just covered the black-box calorimetry, as soon
as possible, with a second paper on products when it's ready.
That would be a good idea. In fact, even if they had a section on
calorimetry and another on mass spectroscopy ready
Not yet. I am backing my belief by having invested in CYPW, Cyclone Power
Technologies, where YE Kim consults.
But I'm looking into buying some bitcoins. I have completely ignored
bitcoins until now.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Now, have you
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
I agree with you Kevin.
Just keep in mind that sometimes there is too much risk and it is reasons
to take what I say as another factor.
***I cannot keep it in mind because it is underdeveloped. It is a simple
Jones,
I posit that Hotson’s sea of ‘negative’ energy is simply the opposing side
of the electron’s dipole-like oscillation of the vacuum…
I posted an article on 5/18 which is yet more evidence that the electron is
at least in line with my hypothesis:
The resulting data revealed each electron as
19 matches
Mail list logo
