The time delay is anticipated as follows:
SN 1987A was first observed in February, 1987 when it baffled some
scientists with an intriguing anomaly. After a star collapses,
traditionally a super nova should immediately emit a burst of neutrinos,
followed by a time delayed burst of photons. In the
I do not know how you defend your own greed - especially if you have made
the wrong decision. Kevin you are just one of.
My point was not that AR should say something els9e - he could say
something less irritating to you and othersthat belive conspiracy is the
issue. Reality is that you are just
how lucky is cold fusion to be assumed impossible so that they is no
blacksuit to forbid it ;-)
in fact from FP explosion, rossi explosion, it seems some self-regulation
should be enforced... detecting and recording radiations, checking
contamination, keeping samples...
all is mild radioactive,
Of course we have data comparing nearby super nova explosions to those of
distant ones. I do not recall anyone finding the delay in relation to the
nearby ones. The other issue to consider is that these explosions are
extremely energetic. Certainly the amount of time required to tear apart
Interesting that they expected it to be delayed by 3 hours. How would a star
remain together for that long under those extreme conditions? The forces
generated by the energy contained in such a small local should be almost beyond
imagination. How long does an A bomb remain intact? (few
Contrariwise, almost everything he's referred to has come to fruition in
one form or another. (Maybe not the automated factory, but where DID all
those 1MW units, in 3 different models, come from?)
***Oh really. Where's that big, well known customer he claimed to have
shipped to in 2011? Do you
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
I do not know how you defend your own greed -
***That has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
especially if you have made the wrong decision.
***Why should it make ANY difference to you, whatsoever?
Kevin
In reply to David Roberson's message of Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:11:05 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Of course we have data comparing nearby super nova explosions to those of
distant ones. I do not recall anyone finding the delay in relation to the
nearby ones. The other issue to consider is that these
This is not a conventional Tokomak reactor. It is a small-scale round one.
A start-up company called Tokamak Solutions is (or was) trying to develop
it. I think Gryaznevich now has a company called Tokamak Energy. See:
http://www.tokamakenergy.co.uk/team/
In reply to David Roberson's message of Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:11:05 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
BTW there may also have been also have been other external gas/dust/plasma
clouds between the us and the explosion.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
I agree that there should be no new physics involved except for some form of
unknown interaction between here and the source of the signals. I suppose we
are left with a question as to whether or not sufficient data is available
about closer super nova as compared with those far removed.
It
Yeah, that is what I have been suspecting which should delay the light but not
neutrinos. Perhaps we have stumbled upon a form of CT scan using neutrinos and
light time differences to detect density of dust and gas between us and the
nova. All we need is for space to remain constant for a few
Kevin it does not make any difference to me if you are doing good or bad
decisions. As you are talking about it and think others are to blame - I
thought it was fair game and I do call a spade a spade. However, now you
have made an investment and when it goes sour then the solution is to find
a
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:51 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
The delay is caused by the photons trying to fight their way through the
plasma
and gas. Even after the explosion has taken place, some of them still have
to
fight their way through the expanding plasma cloud ...
Note also that in a
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
Kevin it does not make any difference to me if you are doing good or bad
decisions.
***Then why bring it up?
As you are talking about it and think others are to blame - I thought it
was fair game and I do call a
15 matches
Mail list logo
