Kevin it does not make any difference to me if you are doing good or bad decisions. As you are talking about it and think others are to blame - I thought it was fair game and I do call a spade a spade. However, now you have made an investment and when it goes sour then the solution is to find a sinner. I understand that if it is not conspiracy then they are individually ganging up on your investments. You have imagination I will admit. There is no accusation in that. Just simple fact. I have said all the time it is a dangerous time to do investment in this genre. Nothing for non-risk-takers.
Education or title has nothing to do with performance. You stated they are 'gurus' - well educated. I simply said that does not mean anything in regards to what they have promised and should have known. No, Kevin you are the one talking about conspiracy. I do not think, that talk has any merit. No, you did not say that AR is in a cover-up. However, he ought to be more aware of what is going on than you and I. Then he is the one who has gotten a timeline. If he thought they are delaying, by pure evil and personal greed, he would not be understanding of the delay. We can leave my leadership business out of this argument. I certainly would not try to lead you. To negative - a hopeless case. Or maybe you just act? Hope so. I do not have to exhibit any leadership in a discussion that is just a circle. Just thought that you should chill if you saw that it obviously is nobody else thinking as you do. Did you mention accusation? Heard the story about throwing rocks in glasshouse. I do not know your age. It could just as well be a compliment. My memory although cloudy by the years, let me remember that at 21 I thought everything should work. At that age I think I could have invested and blamed someone else or the cold summer of -64. At 14 there were other things but investment that interested me. Do you think I might get those hormones in that same frenzy? What is it that makes you think so? Let me know . BTW my English could be better - I knew that before you pointed it out - I guess it was pure goodwill from your side. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> > wrote: > >> I do not know how you defend your own greed - >> > ***That has nothing to do with the issue at hand. > > >> especially if you have made the wrong decision. >> > ***Why should it make ANY difference to you, whatsoever? > > >> Kevin you are just one of. >> > ***You'll need to rewrite that sentence because it has no meaning. > > >> My point was not that AR should say something els9e - he could say >> something less irritating to you and othersthat belive conspiracy is the >> issue. >> > ***So, you're back to reiterating your point. One thing to keep in mind > is that a conspiracy does not necessarily have to exist for this outcome to > be as late as it is. Each one of those 7 PhD's could have decided > INDEPENDENTLY to take advantage of the information. > > > >> Reality is that you are just concerned about yourown greed. >> > ***Reality is you're deflecting, and now getting accusatory. > > >> You have made another big mistake that makes me belive you are 21. >> > ***Insults now, huh? Such poorly crafted insults make me believe you are > 14. You certainly have no business claiming "strategic leadership" as a > tagline; more like strategic bandwagon joining and purely conventional, > inside-the-box thinking. > > >> Reality is that education and academical merits has no correlation to >> ability of making things happen - often the opposite. >> > ***Perhaps some day I might possibly care enough about what you just wrote > to ask you to clarify it. > > >> Observe I have never said that it is OK with not living up to ones >> promises, just that conspiracy does not go with the territory. >> > ***There you go again, with a straw argument of conspiracy. > > >> AR's response isso farfrom acover up that even you . . . . >> > ***When did I EVER claim that Rossi is engaging in a coverup? Please try > to exhibit some of that strategic leadership you lay such a claim upon. > Stop using straw arguments. > > >> On Jun 30, 2014 5:14 PM, "Kevin O'Malley" <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Kevin, >>>> At least you have to try to believe that people are not all malicious. >>>> >>> ***I'm not attributing malice. I'm attributing greed. >>> >>> >>> >>>> He certainly could say that he is disappointed and that he feels that >>>> they have broken their promises. >>>> >>> ***And that would help out his case exactly how? They'd just delay the >>> report even further. >>> >>> >>>> He could say a lot other things instead of just throwing out a lie, >>>> which he for sure would have to pay dearly for if you are right (which you >>>> are not). >>>> >>> ***Perhaps you are not familiar with Rossi's credibility issues >>> regarding his past posts on JONP. >>> >>> >>> >>>> There for sure are other motivational factors for people than greed. >>>> >>> ***Yes, there are. I just find it difficult to believe that these 7 >>> PhD's are so incompetent. I mean, the vast majority of Vorts knew that >>> there would probably have to be isotopic analysis on the 6 month test. >>> But these geniuses are ONLY NOW getting around to thinking about doing it? >>> That simply does not add up. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Best Regards , >>>> Lennart Thornros >>>> >>>> www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com >>>> lenn...@thornros.com >>>> +1 916 436 1899 >>>> 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 >>>> >>>> “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a >>>> commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” >>>> PJM >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yeah, I read it. What else can Rossi say? You don't spit at the >>>>> alligator until you're done crossing the river. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Thornros < >>>>> lenn...@thornros.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Alan, >>>>>> I am 100% a believer in that those statements are a true reflection >>>>>> of the reasons for the delay. >>>>>> I hope Kevin reads it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best Regards , >>>>>> Lennart Thornros >>>>>> >>>>>> www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com >>>>>> lenn...@thornros.com >>>>>> +1 916 436 1899 >>>>>> 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 >>>>>> >>>>>> “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a >>>>>> commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” >>>>>> PJM >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Andrea Rossi >>>>>>> June 29th, 2014 at 9:46 AM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=848&cpage=8#comment-972594> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Giuliano Bettini: >>>>>>> I edited your text for obvious reasons, conserving the meaning >>>>>>> of it. You must know that the peer reviewing of a scientific >>>>>>> publication >>>>>>> usually takes 6 months as an average. >>>>>>> The experiment made by the Third Independent Party is important, >>>>>>> as you correctly wrote, and the Professors, to avoid criticisms, >>>>>>> need all >>>>>>> the time necessary to publish results of which they need to be sure >>>>>>> beyond >>>>>>> any reasonable doubt, also considering all the experience and the >>>>>>> critics >>>>>>> made during and after the 2013 experiment. It is not just matter of >>>>>>> patience, it is also matter of respect for serious scientific work. >>>>>>> The >>>>>>> reviewing must take all the time it needs on the base of a serious >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> exhaustive analysis of the results, positive or negative as they >>>>>>> might be. >>>>>>> Warm Regards, >>>>>>> A.R. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Andrea Rossi >>>>>>> June 29th, 2014 at 7:40 AM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=848&cpage=8#comment-972560> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Angel Blume: >>>>>>> We will give detailed public information about the 1 MW plant in >>>>>>> operation in the factory of the Customer when the visits will start. >>>>>>> At the >>>>>>> moment we cannot give any specific information. It is matter of >>>>>>> months, not >>>>>>> years, though. >>>>>>> Warm Regards, >>>>>>> A.R. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
