On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kevin it does not make any difference to me if you are doing good or bad > decisions. > ***Then why bring it up? > As you are talking about it and think others are to blame - I thought it > was fair game and I do call a spade a spade. > ***Then I shall call your "strategic leadership" and other nonsense exactly what it is as well. > However, now you have made an investment and when it goes sour then the > solution is to find a sinner > ***How is that a solution? It solves nothing. > . I understand that if it is not conspiracy then they are individually > ganging up on your investments. > ***You seem fundamentally incapable of arguing without using strawmen to prop up. Where did I say they're "ganging up on my investments"? I didn't. I said they are being selfish with the information they're hoarding. > You have imagination I will admit. > ***And you don't. A tragic flaw for someone who claims the mantle of "strategic leadership". > There is no accusation in that. Just simple fact. I have said all the time > it is a dangerous time to do investment in this genre. Nothing for > non-risk-takers. > ***I'm glad to see that we agree. The reason why it is a dangerous time to invest in LENR is because of the selfish hoarding of information, a market cornered by 7 PhD dudes who, in your view are simply incompetent but in my view they are obviously engaging in insider trading. > > Education or title has nothing to do with performance. > ***Now again you resort to a meaningless phrase, a cliche, rather than developing your thoughts the way a "strategic leader" would be doing. > You stated they are 'gurus' - well educated. I simply said that does not > mean anything in regards to what they have promised and should have known. > ***So here you are backtracking? Are they incompetent? The things they "should have known" that the vast majority of vorticians knew was that there should be isotopic testing. They're just now figuring that out, and you're just now backtracking enough to start with the acknowledgement that such a thing shows tremendous incompetence. So much incompetence that it begs the question of... perhaps they're not that incompetent, just engaging in insider trading. > > No, Kevin you are the one talking about conspiracy. I do not think, that > talk has any merit. > ***I did NOT talk about conspiracy. You inserted and asserted it. > > No, you did not say that AR is in a cover-up. However, he ought to be more > aware of what is going on than you and I. Then he is the one who has gotten > a timeline. > If he thought they are delaying, by pure evil and personal greed, he would > not be understanding of the delay. > ***And if he were in such a position as you describe, what would his post on JONP look like? Exactly like the one he posted. > > We can leave my leadership business out of this argument. > ***As long as you're throwing zingers, zingers will be thrown back atcha. > I certainly would not try to lead you. > ***Good for you. Maybe you can POTO to someone else and jump on a bandwagon or two & call it leadership. > To negative - a hopeless case. > ***I was looking to put my money where my mouth is. In your hopelessly negative case, you do not appear to have put down one red cent where your mouth is, you ain't a leader, you hide negative viewpoints out of fear, and then you try to browbeat those who disagree with you. Truly a hopeless case. > Or maybe you just act? Hope so. > ***If yours is an act, you need to change the tune. > I do not have to exhibit any leadership in a discussion that is just a > circle. > ***Don't worry, you haven't exhibited any leadership in this discussion so that's one concern you can pull off your table. > Just thought that you should chill if you saw that it obviously is nobody > else thinking as you do. > ***Gosh, you mean I'm so far ahead in strategic leadership that someone like you needs to look around for bandwagon joiners just so he can feel reassured? Maybe you should find a parade to step in front of so you can pretend to be leading it... you'll feel reassured and it will look like you're some kinda leader. I hear you can get consulting gigs that way. > Did you mention accusation? Heard the story about throwing rocks in > glasshouse. > ***Look back on our interactions. You'll see the accusations coming from you, and me responding. Some leader you are... > I do not know your age. It could just as well be a compliment. My memory > although cloudy by the years, let me remember that at 21 I thought > everything should work. At that age I think I > could have invested and blamed someone else or the cold summer of -64. At > 14 there were other things but investment that interested me. Do you think > I might get those hormones in that same frenzy? What is it that makes you > think so? Let me know . > ***Stream of consciousness bullshit. Look at your own glass house. > BTW my English could be better - I knew that before you pointed it out - I > guess it was pure goodwill from your side. > ***Your english is good enough. Your cloudy bandwagon thinking is what needs help. > > Best Regards , > Lennart Thornros > > www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com > ***Strategic FOLOWership Sack o' crap is more like it.
