Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

I wrote: About the matter of the Coulomb barrier -- I like your and Dave's argument > that the Coulomb barrier should be expected to work in one direction (and > this would also seem to be implied by the shell theorem). But Krane on > three or so occasions has written things that imply that the

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

Yep Jed. a GSM / EDGE non-smart-phone Orboost technology licensed to Wicked E-Juices for creation of never-charge E-Cig and a gamecontroller for regular came-consoles and the OCube for charging smartphones 2-3 times a day or 1 tablet per day. and.. the one they don't talk about, which is the

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

William Beaty wrote: > Phone charger version.Heh, buy a bunch as xmas gifts! > > > http://dispatchesfromthefuture.com/2015/12/steorn_taking_orders_for_ocube_preorders.html Also, an e-cigarette?!? - Jed

[Vo]:Do not wait a perfect LENR technology soon- Rossi's Nrgative

Simple analysis- semantic, logical, technological http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/12/dec-9-2015-lenr-do-not-wait-perfections.html Patience is not my main virtue, but we all need it Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:Antigravity started at Vortex - Fluxliner

Way back when multiple people apparently replicated the capwarp successfully, reporting their results in Vort. I recall one guy even made a capacitor using the pages of a book as the dielectric and claimed results. http://amasci.com/caps/capwarp.html Well now there is a fascinating claim that a

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

This motor is certainly not a perpetual motion machine, but it is an electrostatic motor. It bears a striking resemblance to a Wimshurst generator, which could be used as a motor, and also to Jefimenko's electrostatic motors. Electrostatic motors are real - the original demonstration may not

[Vo]:The conspiracies do exist!

http://boingboing.net/2015/12/08/undercover-greenpeace-activist.html I dunno if my emails have been censored from vortex or something though. Nobody ever replies to them anymore :D

RE: [Vo]:The conspiracies do exist!

I would point out that this prostitution can extend in any direction. Recall that in the documentary, “Who Killed The Electric Car?” there was an academic who came forward to California authorities and spoke glowingly about the promise of fuel cells so that the EV-1 could be eliminated and

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:39 PM, wrote: So I suspect that it's just the naming convention that is confusing you. > In oblong nuclei, there is an angular dependency on the alpha tunneling probability. Alpha particles are more likely to tunnel out of poles of such nuclei

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:00:24 -0600: Hi, [snip] >About the matter of the Coulomb barrier -- I like your and Dave's argument >that the Coulomb barrier should be expected to work in one direction (and this >would also seem to be implied by the shell theorem). But

Re: [Vo]:Antigravity started at Vortex - Fluxliner

Anyways, here's another kind of subtle censorship: http://boingboing.net/2015/12/08/undercover-greenpeace-activist.html You academics sure are sneaky people. On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Hey where was that great email about Wolfram. Why

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

Another Steorn video pops up on Facebook, here's another transcript. https://www.facebook.com/thebatteryisdead/videos/10153398806872672/ "some additional details of the Orbo power cell", Transcribed by Esa Juhani Ruoho /

Re: [Vo]:Antigravity started at Vortex - Fluxliner

Hey where was that great email about Wolfram. Why am I not getting in email? The people complain about LENR censorship. LOL! On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:20 AM, John Berry wrote: > Way back when multiple people apparently replicated the capwarp > successfully, reporting

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:00:24 -0600: Hi, [snip] >That would also create daughters with much higher energies. A nice thing >about the lower energies involved in alpha captures is that the daughters end >up having ~ 300 keV/nucleon, which is not that much. Also,

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:39 PM, wrote: IOW the barrier does work in two directions (due to the two forces at > work), but > is never named accordingly. So I suspect that it's just the naming > convention > that is confusing you. > When calculating the tunneling probability

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:06:32 -0600: Hi, [snip] >In oblong nuclei, there is an angular dependency on the alpha tunneling >probability. Alpha particles are more likely to tunnel out of poles of such >nuclei rather than at the circumference. Krane writes, "Since

Re: [Vo]:The conspiracies do exist!

OK Blaze we do not want you to despair:) I think this is (unfortunately) not a conspiracy. That is how our modern world works. We have directed all the money to one entity. Now there is only one way to influence the future. Electrical cars or medicine or risk analysis does not matter what is

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:11:42 -0600: Hi, [snip] >On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:39 PM, wrote: > >IOW the barrier does work in two directions (due to the two forces at >> work), but >> is never named accordingly. So I suspect that it's just the naming

[Vo]:Wiki2 - Wikipedia Republished

Maybe there is some hope... https://en.wiki2.org/ -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

Guys, what would you expect to happen if the identity of individual nucleons is lost once they enter the nucleus? Since each is supposed to be constructed from 3 quarks, it may be logical to assume that nearby nucleons behave as one greater one composed of 6 or more quarks. How would one

RE: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

From: Eric Walker The nuclear force is very short range. Ø Here is where I'm inclined to part with conventional wisdom. Consider that 1 barn is the approximate area of a medium-sized nucleus presented to an oncoming neutron, that nuclei such as 135Xe have neutron-capture cross

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:26 PM, wrote: 1) I'm curious as to how they know that tunneling from the poles is more > likely, > given that they can't actually see what's going on. (Perhaps the anisotropy > shows up in experiments done in a strong magnetic field?) > Yes -- this

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:06 PM, David Roberson wrote: Guys, what would you expect to happen if the identity of individual > nucleons is lost once they enter the nucleus? There is an assumption that the identity is lost, in a sense. Through meson exchange, neutrons are

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

I realize I am asking strange questions, but sometimes it pays off to consider alternate ideas. For example, is 12 a magic number when it comes to the number of quarks in one grouping? Since alpha particles are emitted during some radioactive decays but no D's, perhaps 12 is magic while 6 is

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 9 Dec 2015 20:49:09 -0600: Hi, [snip] >Understood. I only wanted to get agreement on what Krane's understanding >is. I think Krane's understanding is the mainstream position. This is not >necessarily the correct one, but it's good to know what it is if

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:00 PM, wrote: The nuclear force is very short range. Here is where I'm inclined to part with conventional wisdom. Consider that 1 barn is the approximate area of a medium-sized nucleus presented to an oncoming neutron, that nuclei such as 135Xe

[Vo]:Fw: new message

Hey! Open message kowals...@mail.montclair.edu