Re: [Vo]:Article: Is dark energy a real thing?

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:37 PM, David Roberson wrote: Does this mean that a few Nobel prizes were awarded a bit premature? Are > they ever recalled once proven in error? > It would be very embarrassing for them to have to recall Nobel prizes. I wonder whether they would

Re: [Vo]:Article: Is dark energy a real thing?

Does this mean that a few Nobel prizes were awarded a bit premature? Are they ever recalled once proven in error? Dave -Original Message- From: Eric Walker To: vortex-l Sent: Wed, Oct 26, 2016 12:21 am Subject: [Vo]:Article: Is

[Vo]:Article: Is dark energy a real thing?

The following article describes a study calling into question one experiment upon which the notion of dark energy is based: http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/1023/Is-dark-energy-a-real-thing-Maybe-not-new-study-suggests Also of interest, two articles discussing a study that says that the

RE: [Vo]:The return of the original "cold fusion" ??

Why don’t you do this yourself. Most experimentalists have their own ‘to do lists’ and don’t have the valuable time and money to dedicate work on other people’s ideas. As Thomas Edison once said/paraphrased of the countless jaybird comments, ‘get out of here, the only rule here is that we’re

Re: [Vo]:The return of the original "cold fusion" ??

Muon detection is far harder than the simple "$100 muon" detector suggests. Sure, it detects muons + + + protons, high energy beta, gamma - it has no specificity for muons. Detection of muons with any credibility requires far more apparatus. "not quite as simple" is a far, far understatement.

Re: [Vo]:The return of the original "cold fusion" ??

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > I have been trying to get any replicator or cold fusion experiments to > test for muon during the last six months. I have concentrated this best > effort of persuasion on MFMP, but they are highly resistant to the idea. I >

RE: [Vo]:The return of the original "cold fusion" ??

From: Axil Axil * * I have been trying to get any replicator or cold fusion experiments to test for muon during the last six months. I have concentrated this best effort of persuasion on MFMP, but they are highly resistant to the idea. I do not understand why. Possibly in the

Re: [Vo]:The return of the original "cold fusion" ??

I have been trying to get any replicator or cold fusion experiments to test for muon during the last six months. I have concentrated this best effort of persuasion on MFMP, but they are highly resistant to the idea. I do not understand why. I had one success. eros "a replicator" has tested for

Re: [Vo]:Abstract of new Holmlid paper

WHen CP violation occurs, the quarks in the proton and neutron can change into strange quarks through a change of state in the color force. This could cause a D-meson to form. The D-Meson can decay into Kaons, then to pions, then to muons, then to electrons. The D mesons are the lightest particle

Re: [Vo]:Abstract of new Holmlid paper

Ed Storms: “The NAE in my theory are cracks of a especially small gap size that are generated by stress relief in the material. They permit formation of a structure that is able to lower the Coulomb barrier and dissipate the energy by emission of low energy photons from the nucleus. The theory

[Vo]:The return of the original "cold fusion" ??

The first use of the term "cold fusion" goes back to 1956 - not 1989. The term was coined in a 1956 New York Times article referring to muon-catalyzed fusion, MCF, and the work of Alvarez. This was real fusion, no dispute about it, and the reactants were as cold as any fog chamber can be. The

Re: [Vo]:Abstract of new Holmlid paper

The posit of this post is that anisotropic magnets produce the LENR reaction because the unbalanced field lines being a monopole field produces magnetic field lines that tend to be twisted thus producing excitation in the nucleons via CP symmetry breaking. Their Color force having been excited by

[Vo]:hit by the Midas Touch of Time

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-25-2016-lenr-midas-touch-of-time.html yours, peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

RE: [Vo]:Abstract of new Holmlid paper

Thanks… and it can be added that Wiki now has an entry for proton decay. The Holmlid effect can be described as an enhancement mechanism for proton decay… which is a hypothetical form of radioactive decay in which the proton decays into subatomic particles, mainly pions. There is currently no

Re: [Vo]:Abstract of new Holmlid paper

Paper is available from http://sci-hub.bz/10.1142/S0218301316500853 On Oct 25, 2016 10:19, "Axil Axil" wrote: > Holmlid has also showed that the "Hole" theory of superconductivity is > valid and this theory must now replace the current BCS theory. > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at

Re: [Vo]:Abstract of new Holmlid paper

Holmlid has also showed that the "Hole" theory of superconductivity is valid and this theory must now replace the current BCS theory. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > Paraphrased abstract of new Holmlid paper - Published 18 October 2016. It > is