I agree that a phase shift would occur due to normal path length differences.
What I am wondering about is whether or not that basic shift would have an
additional component that depends upon the magnitude of the gravitational mass
contained within the sphere's shell assuming that the path
In reply to David Roberson's message of Fri, 9 Dec 2016 17:10:45 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Interesting question. Since the frequency of a photon increases as it gains
>energy on the way into the hollow gravitational sphere one might expect time
>to speed up for it. If it is allowed to pass through
See:
Miles, M. and R. Cantwell, *Data from Melvin Miles' July 2016 experiment*.
2016.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MilesMdatafromme.pdf
Interesting question. Since the frequency of a photon increases as it gains
energy on the way into the hollow gravitational sphere one might expect time to
speed up for it. If it is allowed to pass through another hole on the other
side the time rate would return to the original value once it
On 12/09/2016 01:54 PM, H LV wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence > wrote:
Well known result -- gravitational time dilation has to do with
the gravitational potential, not the strength of the field.
GR's principle
Axil, according to a 2005 paper by Jan Naudts the hydrino may be relativistic
hydrogen, but considering the environment this is not your near C velocity
induced SR, in fact the near C observer relative to us is the perspective that
we now observe wrt the hydrino, the same suppression
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.znidarsic_science_books.dreams
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-09-2016-dangerous-moment-in-lenr.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> Well known result -- gravitational time dilation has to do with the
> gravitational potential, not the strength of the field.
>
>
GR's principle of equivalence depends on the concept of a force and not on
the concept
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> Well known result -- gravitational time dilation has to do with the
> gravitational potential, not the strength of the field.
>
>
> Simple gedanken: Drop a rock through a slender shaft into a spherical
> hollow cut
The neutron decays as we all know….to 2/3 of a proton and a “W-“ which in, turn
quickly changes to an electron, a full proton and a anti neutrino—Standard
Theory--think. It’s the “W-“ that only exists virtually for 10e-27 seconds!
That’s enough time to allow it to get away from the proton in
The hydrino is net neutral like the neutron, but unlike the neutron it has a
strong negatively charged near-field due to the electron in the OS. Electrons
don't feel the strong force, only the electromagnetic / electrostatic force
thus they do not approach the nucleus closely enough to
Alain
I have the same experience about China.(France and US).
Isn't a good idea neglect political labels. There is none providing a
'best' result or worse for that matter. The culture with which they are
implemented is more of an important factor.
Eliminating energy pro lens would be a step to
http://date.localtransexualcontacts.com/lezyxycyvyvub.go
Kelly Smunt
3:21 AM
The hydrino cannot be smaller than the neutron. Being neutral, it must
behave like the neutron. We should see hydrino damage on the structure of
the SunCell and maybe even activation as hydrino kinetic energy is
converted to gamma by impact with reactor structure. We might also expect
to see
the mentality of Chinese people is very capitalist at local level, and also
more family than individual oriented.
However at the political level they seems more imperial, and abroad they
tolerate the local authorities, even local criminality as long as it is not
impairing business...
It is a mix
16 matches
Mail list logo