Not true. Learn how Hawking's radiation works.
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:02 AM, wrote:
> In reply to Eric Walker's message of Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:46:41 -0700:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >If we take the other option, then nothing in our timeline ever happens to
> >things that have crossed over the event ho
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:46:41 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>If we take the other option, then nothing in our timeline ever happens to
>things that have crossed over the event horizon, and it is meaningless to
>talk about its contents.
>
It's worse than that - nothing ever even
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:10 PM, wrote:
Indeed, but it still means that from our point of view we would never get
> to see
> what happens.
> Or, from the particles point of view, the rest of the universe has come to
> an
> end before they get together.
>
That was a question for me: for us the el
In reply to Dave Roberson's message of Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:39:58 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>I believe that the theory is that those falling into the black hole see time
>as being normal. Only outside viewers see time slow down.
>
>Dave
Indeed, but it still means that from our point of view we would never
I believe that the theory is that those falling into the black hole see time as
being normal. Only outside viewers see time slow down.
Dave
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 2:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Podcast of inter
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 31 Jan 2018 22:19:50 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>I was of the understanding that the event horizon is merely the point of no
>return for light, where it begins to curve on a trajectory that does not
>escape the black hole. In this understanding, time slows down
>a
6 matches
Mail list logo
