There is another plasmon friendly based factor at play here. This factor is
illustrative in the way Mizuno has advanced his thinking and research over
the years in an evolutionary step by step manor. Early on, Mizuno
discovered that his reaction benefited from distressing the surface of
palladium
I wrote:
> During a bake-out at high temperature, no contamination from the the cell
> walls or the gasket get into the gas. If the gasket were Cu, and some of it
> got into the gas, you would know. During and after a bake-out you run
> samples of gas through the mass spec.
>
As I wrote
FWIW. This detail may have relevance to the Mizuno breakthrough (claimed) … or
not.
Surface plasmons are a hot topic in physics these days. If surface plasmons are
important to the new Mizuno results then the resistance heater which he uses
may be an important component, even if it was chosen
Someone wrote to me saying he intends to try to replicate Mizuno's
experiment, but at a much higher temperature. I responded:
"PLEASE do not make any changes until you have tested the same materials in
the same conditions as the original!! Please follow the instructions as
closely as you can, and
Dave Roberson wrote:
> With further reading I see that some thin gasket was used. I answered my
> own question. Of course the type of material is very critical for anyone
> wanting to replicate the experiment.
>
I do not think the gasket material is critical to replicating the
experiment.
The reactor definitely uses metal gasket seals. I couldn't remember what
metal, but copper sounds right.
There's all kinds. See:
http://www.wermac.org/gaskets/gaskets.html
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 3:58 PM Bob Higgins
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> This looks like standard conflat UHV gear to me. The
Hi Dave,
This looks like standard conflat UHV gear to me. The typical gasket used
for conflats is a fairly thick copper ring that is sealed by compression
between knife edges turned into the conflat faces. In absence of a
description of a special gasket material, I would presume it is the
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Dave Roberson
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 1:40 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake
Interesting results. One question I have is what material is used as a gasket
between the end flanges and the SS
In my opinion, the rate at which heat energy is removed from the casing by the
airflow is a strong controller of the reaction stability. As expected, as long
as the internally generated heat due to the reaction is less than the amount of
heat energy escaping through the case at a given
Interesting results. One question I have is what material is used as a gasket
between the end flanges and the SS reaction chamber? It is hard to believe
that nothing is required to prevent leaks.
Dave
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:18 PM
The huge size of the reactor is an advantage against runaway of the LENR
reaction.
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Friday, 28 June 2019 01:56
To: Vortex
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Exponential and self-heating reactions are not necessarily
unstable
Arnaud Kodeck mailto:arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be> >
11 matches
Mail list logo
