Original URL: http://www.tovima.gr/science/article/?aid=430840
Somewhat garbled Google translate:
*http://tinyurl.com/6mszlt4*http://tinyurl.com/6mszlt4
So they claim they paid Rossi $15 million if I understand it right. If it's
true, he should have been able to fund U of B research for some
It says they had $15 million ready but Rossi did not complete the
contract. That means they never paid Rossi the money and now they seem
to be claiming the technology is all theirs.
- *So the rift between you was not due only to non-payment of first
installment repayment, said Mr. Rossi?*
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Original URL: http://www.tovima.gr/science/article/?aid=430840
Somewhat garbled Google translate: http://tinyurl.com/6mszlt4
Did you see the test chamber at the end of the article?
T
There is also the part about the escrow account.
2011/11/20 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
Original URL: http://www.tovima.gr/science/article/?aid=430840
Somewhat garbled Google translate:
*http://tinyurl.com/6mszlt4*http://tinyurl.com/6mszlt4
So they claim they paid Rossi $15 million
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you see the test chamber at the end of the article?
That looks like one of Piantelli's experiments. Not sure, but I think
that's what it is.
- Jed
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Original URL: http://www.tovima.gr/science/article/?aid=430840
Somewhat garbled Google translate: http://tinyurl.com/6mszlt4
Did you see the
They are technologically skilled, good engineers and have refused
to pay for an immature and unsafe product.
Excess heat is only a necessary, but not a sufficient condition for an
Energy Source. Rossi's E-cat has worked (was functional) but did not worked
well.
Defkalion, it seems, has defined the
On 2011-11-20 18:30, Jed Rothwell wrote:
That looks like one of Piantelli's experiments. Not sure, but I think
that's what it is.
I think that is a photograph of the very expensive equipment Piantelli
uses to make his nickel powder. I remember seeing that somewhere else.
Cheers,
S.A.
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
They are technologically skilled, good engineers and have refused
to pay for an immature and unsafe product.
Who are they? Who refused to pay, for what?
I don't see that in the article.
This translation is remarkably good, for a machine. A little hard
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2011-11-20 18:30, Jed Rothwell wrote:
That looks like one of Piantelli's experiments. Not sure, but I think
that's what it is.
I think that is a photograph of the very expensive equipment Piantelli
uses
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that is a photograph of the very expensive equipment Piantelli
uses to make his nickel powder. I remember seeing that somewhere else.
Powder, or bulk Pd?
I have some similar photos from Piantelli taken many years ago. This is the
kind
The test chamber is indeed very similar to Piantelli's high vacuum
installation of Molecular Beam Epitaxy (see my 3rd paper abou Piantelli in
my Blog).
The Greek installation is: The engine configuration of the grains
of Nickel in vacuum i.e. has the same function- manufacture of Ni
nanoclusters.
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
So it's inappropriate for Defkalion (or the magazine article writers) to
make use of it without attribution.
I expect a copy editor misplaced the caption. You should not make
accusations of nefarious behavior every time a magazine makes a minor error.
On 2011-11-20 18:44, Peter Gluck wrote:
The test chamber is indeed very similar to Piantelli's high vacuum
installation of Molecular Beam Epitaxy (see my 3rd paper abou Piantelli
in my Blog).
It looks like the very same one to me:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
They are technologically skilled, good engineers and have refused
to pay for an immature and unsafe product.
Who are they? Who refused to pay, for what?
I don't see that in
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
It looks like the very same one to me ... Same photo.
Thanks! That issue is resolved!
So what does it have to do with Defkalion other than to puff up the
publication's piece? Anyone know?
The article mentions Piantelli's new patent. I would assume that the author ran
across the photo during that aspect of research, and failed to properly
attribute it to Piantelli's nickel production.
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 10:08:08 -0800
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A new article mostly about Defkalion
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
wrote:
It looks like the very same one to me ... Same photo.
Thanks! That issue is resolved!
So what does it have to do with Defkalion other
On 2011-11-20 19:15, Terry Blanton wrote:
Consider the possibility that, having failed in the deal with Rossi,
Defkalion made a deal with Piantelli.
Interesting speculation. We might know if it's really the case in about
two weeks of time (Defkalion GT announcement). It would be a tragicomic
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
wrote:
We might know if it's really the case in about two weeks of time (Defkalion
GT announcement).
Anyone know when the countdown to this event started? Just curious when
to look for it.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-11-20 19:15, Terry Blanton wrote:
Consider the possibility that, having failed in the deal with Rossi,
Defkalion made a deal with Piantelli.
Interesting speculation. We might know if it's really the
Funny that they use the term The Three Musketeers of Cold Fusion in
the caption of the first picture. That is what I called Jed Rothwell,
Eugene Mallove and Chris Tinsley back in the day.
T
November 14, take a look to the Defkalion Forum.
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/files/DGT_PRESS%20RELEASE_2011-11-14.pdf
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
We might know
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Jed, it seems there was a point in the contract, that the E-cat should
work continuously for at least 48 hours- and it didn't.
Ah. You refer to the Sept. 6 test done by Quantum engineers and NASA, but
which fails due to leakage. Yes, Rossi's prototype
On 2011-11-20 19:26, Mary Yugo wrote:
Anyone know when the countdown to this event started? Just curious
when to look for it.
On November 14th DGT announced: We will release a complete outline of
our developments within the next two weeks.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Funny that they use the term The Three Musketeers of Cold Fusion in
the caption of the first picture.
Maybe because someone's nose is lengthening?
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know when the countdown to this event started? Just curious when to
look for it.
A week from Monday.
T
We don't know what kind of ecat they wanted a proof.
2011/11/20 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
They are technologically skilled, good engineers and have refused
to pay
Defkalion's CEO says about the 48 hours work condition in this paper.
If the E-cat has heated the office for two years, then it seems later it
made serious regress. You can show any photography, how could we know that
the thing heats indeed?
As regarding Prof Focardi who;
a) tacitly accepts the
We don't know what kind of ecat they wanted Rossi to show.
2011/11/20 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
Defkalion's CEO says about the 48 hours work condition in this paper.
If the E-cat has heated the office for two years, then it seems later it
made serious regress. You can show any
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
We don't know what kind of ecat they wanted Rossi to show.
I'm going to guess that they wanted to see the kind that works. I will
further venture that they would have settled for any table top nuclear
fusion reactor
If Rossi is lying, so is Defkalion, they are playing the same gaming now.
2011/11/20 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
We don't know what kind of ecat they wanted Rossi to show.
I'm going to guess that they wanted to
32 matches
Mail list logo
