Cools is a relative term. The temperature of a spark can reach about
20,000C. For example, Palladium vaporizes above 3000C so nanoparticle of
palladium will start to form just under that very high temperature. Water
will always produce nanoparticles when exposed to a spark.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014
Axil, the V geometry of cracks may even be a better embodiment for a thrust
capacitor in terms of bias to a specific axis. Previous experiments by Italian
researchers to “stack” Casimir cavities have failed but I don’t think the
orientation of the cavities was maintained such that stacking
Okay, then that introduces an interesting concept that I have not seen in
the literature. I keep seeing it postulated here on Vortex that there's a
relativity-based theory that explains it. I do not understand the theory
so I haven't spent the cycles to click through and figure it out.
But here
A google search for relative Luttinger Liquid produces only 1 hit, a PhD
thesis worth looking at, perhaps applicable to LENR.
Coulomb Drag in Vertically-Integrated
One-Dimensional Quantum Wires
http://gervaislab.mcgill.ca/Laroche_PhD_Thesis.pdf
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Kevin O'Malley
This is actually a significant paper. The author discovered NEGATIVE
Coulomb drag resistance.
Discovery of negative one-dimensional Coulomb drag occurring at
high electronic density in the wires
Results concerning the negative Coulomb drag were published as original
work with DL appearing as
That's news to me. Can you please provide some documentation? This would
be an experiment that normal people could perform.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
No doubt, you say. I
Radiation will not be seen in the Mills' arc experiment because an arc that
produces nanoparticles will always result in the formation of a SPP BEC
that will neutralize the nuclear reactions that the spark may produce.
***Excellent point. So the significance of Ed Storms's cracks is that
they
Thank you guys for the real stories of ethical problems
in professional life/ Actually it is a great grey area between the good and
evil, honest and dishonest, the immediately useful -harming on long term and
its opposite. I will publish just now an essay about such problems,
protection against
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf
Here is what cavitation is producing. These are what Ken Shoulders also
produced in spark discharge. Sparks in water always produce cavitation.
Only cavitation in
A spark produces a plasma, whenever a plasma cools as it must eventually
do, at a minimum, it produces nanoparticles out of the vaporized electrode
material that carried the spark..
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:47 PM,
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
A spark produces a plasma, whenever a plasma cools as it must eventually
do, at a minimum, it produces nanoparticles out of the vaporized electrode
material that carried the spark..
***When a plasma COOLs That is utterly
Mills himself says NO, hydrinos have nothing to do with LENR.
Peter
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks, I am asking this question because I truly do not know the answer
and clearly, I am not qualified to even begin to answer it. Maybe those
who
Sunday Sermon
Many years ago I think it had been speculated that very early in BLP's
inception, Dr. Mills made both a conscious and strategic decision to distance
the body of his work from the CF/LENR field as quickly as possible. After
watching the public skewering of Pons and Fleischmann
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Mills himself says NO, hydrinos have nothing to do with LENR.
It makes no difference what he says. Whether it does or it does not have a
connection to LENR is a fact of nature, to be decided by experiment.
Some researchers have the odd notion that what
Jed sez:
Some researchers have the odd notion that what they discover belongs
to them in a sense, and they have the privilege of deciding what is it
is and how it works theoretically.
Being afflicted with a God Complex is an equal opportunity employer. Doesn't
seem to matter whether
it is only one strange thing re the possible connection- it seems
Randy is very silent about deuterinos and tritinos. these could tell about
some link with classic LENR.
In 2011 he rejected the work of Rossi and of Piantelli too. Not possible he
said.
Peter
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Jed
Is not the probable energy density of the TIP1 report, well above those
numbers you get from the first hydrino states. Either Rossi
is producing very small hydrinos, or it is nuclear, heck we don't know what
can happen in these low energy nuclear reactions if so,
total mass to energy
This insight into the man does not speak well for this man's desire to
reveal ultimate truth. It sounds like his views of the laws of nature are
skewed by the needs of his ego and his business.
The ascetic truth seeker is most often grounded into dust by the demons
of our nature. This man seeks
I should clarify a couple of things I recently posted:
...Dr. Mills has personally opined that many observers and followers within the
CF/LENR field behave as if they were a bunch of cult admirers hopelessly
invested in their own deluded theoretical causes.
and
The Doctor has
Axil,
This insight into the man does not speak well for this man's desire to reveal
ultimate truth. It sounds like his views of the laws of nature are skewed by
the needs of his ego and his business.
I tend to disagree with this assumption.
What do you mean when you play the
*I see no demons in play here. I see very little dust either. What CEO
when faced with the realities of a competitive environment, hasn't said the
equivalent of: Accept no other false products other than our own. I think I
read something like that in a book somewhere. *
In real world terms
From Axil:
In short order, my colleague lost his job, was banned, and was never rehired.
As a real word
prerogative and a practical life lessen, when staying in business and making
money is more
important than dispensing the truth, the pursuit of truth suffers.
FWIW:
Late last
You seem to be implying that Dr. Mills is deliberately behaving in a
dishonest way.
***I didn't pay much attention to Dr. Mills because he had a long string of
failures but a brilliant career as a theoretician and an ability to attract
investors. He's a shyster who's smarter than me and can pull
I find it difficult to understand a situation where a multi-million dollar
company can exist and prosper for a quarter century without the development
of a single commercially viable product...unless it is the seat of a
technological religion that takes on the guise of a company.
Such a religion
LOL. Mills is not a shyster per se, since he is a brilliant guy and has made a
big impression on the theoretical end with many smart people. Mills’ problem is
in taking an intuitive idea and making it work in the real world. I was a big
fan for a while, but after a certain level of accumulated
Jones sez:
And yes, there is no doubt that - especially the seam welder – if it
were tested now with a radiation monitor after a few runs, will be shown
to be activated.
Doubt that we will see detail that published … due of course to the NDA.
No doubt, you say. I admire the
Axil,
You seem to be implying that CQM is essentially religion. You also seem to be
implying that BLP is run by the equivalent of another L. Ron Hubbard. It seems
to me that one might be able to imply that the same thing has already happened
to how standard quantum mechanics seems to be
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
No doubt, you say. I admire the certainty of your
conviction. But then... maybe not. ;-)
Transmutation is turning up in arc welders at 140 amps, so why not 10,000? I
would agree that the radioactivity
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I find it difficult to understand a situation where a multi-million dollar
company can exist and prosper for a quarter century without the development
of a single commercially viable product...
Here in California some
Radiation will not be seen in the Mills' arc experiment because an arc that
produces nanoparticles will always result in the formation of a SPP BEC
that will neutralize the nuclear reactions that the spark may produce.
One has to work very hard to avoid BEC formation in spark discharge so that
Quantum Mechanics is not well developed in relation to the explanations
that it can provide to explain all the vast array of weird things that seem
to be occurring at and below the atomic level.
Once LENR is taken seriously, I expect it to be a gold mine for research
into quantum weirdness in
Folks, I am asking this question because I truly do not know the answer and
clearly, I am not qualified to even begin to answer it. Maybe those who have
actually studied Mills GUTCP book can help answer this question. (Mike and
Robin? up for some calculations.)
This is a bounce off the
Most Pd/D systems produce heat through cavitation.
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks, I am asking this question because I truly do not know the answer
and clearly, I am not qualified to even begin to answer it. Maybe those
who have actually
By cavitation, I presume you mean that the cavitation would cause Deuterium to
slam to each other and fuse ala Hot fusion?
If so, where are the gammas?
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2014 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Can the
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf
Here is what cavitation is producing. These are what Ken Shoulders also
produced in spark discharge. Sparks in water always produce cavitation.
Only cavitation in water produces gamma because no BEC can be produced.
Sparks in a gas do not
In reply to Jojo Iznart's message of Sun, 3 Aug 2014 05:23:47 +0800:
Hi,
Shrinkage to H[n=1/4] yields 204 eV / atom (starting out from an H atom in the
ground state). If you can find out how much energy was produced, and how much
Hydrogen was consumed, you can work out for yourself whether or
It just dawned on me that cavitation produced by a pump will produce gamma,
whereas cavitation produced by a spark does not produce gamma. Cavitation
produced by a pump does not have the power to produce nano particles, but
an arc is hot and energetic enough to produce nano particles from plasma
37 matches
Mail list logo
