@Jones
We tested the Aramco coating in our experiments at HUG in February 2015.
It was moderately effective but was found to degrade over time at 900°C.
See the image at
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxxJkjesxe4kUUJubGlNaEZ1VVU
You can also see in that image the effect of long-term
AlanG,
Thanks for the complete explanation. I guess the most obvious follow-on is
that since the Williamson two-frequency pyrometer, recommended to Bob
Greenyer by industry experts as the most accurate technique available (the
one which has been used successfully in this older testing)- then why
Jones, this issue has been discussed at great length, here and
elsewhere. My conclusions based on my own research and Bob Higgins'
excellent paper are that the emissivity of high-purity alumina at 6-12
um is reasonably constant at ~0.92 over the range of temperatures the
GlowStick operates,
@Jones
According to Aremco, their spec was based only on anecdotal
information. We proposed to do formal testing for them and they
provided a sample for that purpose. Our testing was done with a
Williamson two-frequency pyrometer, recommended to Bob Greenyer by
industry experts as the most
From: AlanG
We tested the Aramco coating in our experiments at HUG in February 2015.
It was moderately effective but was found to degrade over time at 900°C. See
the image at https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxxJkjesxe4kUUJubGlNaEZ1VVU
Alan,
This image appears to shows a bleaching of the
Have you done a spectroscopic analysis of all the radiation produced by the
reactor including x-rays, extreme ultraviolet(aka black light), and RF
radio frequencies?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:03 PM, AlanG a...@magicsound.us wrote:
@Jones
We tested the Aramco coating in our experiments at HUG
@Axil
The gamma spectrum was monitored continuously during the GS3 tests,
covering the range ~80 KeV to over 1 MeV, and nothing above background
was seen. An animation of the 1-hour samples can be seen at:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxxJkjesxe4kT3FOcmtkUnoydkk
A GC320+ geiger counter
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:32 PM, AlanG a...@magicsound.us wrote:
Using a coating would require recalibration and testing, and would make
comparison with prior test data open to question.
I'm sure you've thought through this. Commenting only on the tactical
merits and not on the technical
. Welding is
a more common joining technique, but electro-plating may give a better bond
without any carbon or oxygen contamination.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 3:34 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Is the new MFMP test flawed from the start?
I wasn’t aware
@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Is the new MFMP test flawed from the start?
I wasn’t aware of “photon multiplication” as a potential hindrance to IR
testing (in the context of thermometry) until recently, but it is a hot topic
in Optics journals these days. Was it even mentioned wrt Lugano? Doubt
I wasn't aware of photon multiplication as a potential hindrance to IR
testing (in the context of thermometry) until recently, but it is a hot
topic in Optics journals these days. Was it even mentioned wrt Lugano? Doubt
it. For instance - with quantum dots as the receptor, 7 new visible photons
11 matches
Mail list logo
