From Abd:
...
With all those caveats, and wondering why you'd ask *me*, since I'd
really ask someone else, like Dr. Storms, if I cared all that much
about it, ...
My previous comments were not exclusively addressed to you alone. I opened
my query up to comments coming from anyone who wishes
I'll remind, just in case it isn't clear for everybody, that for every
two Ds which will have disappeared and every He which will have
appeared, 24 MeV of energy will have been released in any case,
_whatever the intermediary or concurrent reactions if any_.
The energy released by a nuclear
On Mar 25, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
I'll remind, just in case it isn't clear for everybody, that for every
two Ds which will have disappeared and every He which will have
appeared, 24 MeV of energy will have been released in any case,
_whatever the intermediary or concurrent
Indeed, DL Hotson's third epo treatise that I just shared with you
references this paper:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf
whereby, all types of exchanges are occurring.
T
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
There is a wealth
Here again are the slides I discussed yesterday:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/2010/2010KrivitS-ACS.pdf
A few weeks ago, Krivit discussed here the graph shown on Slide 30. I
pointed out that it should show the zero line, and it should include
error bars. In the presentation Krivit put
This annoying trick is described on p. 62 of a marvelous little book
by Darrell Huff, How to Lie with Statistics (1954, now in its 39th printing).
This book was printed the year I was born. As I recall, my mother
gave me a copy as a child with the admonition: grown-ups sometimes
lie. In
On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:34 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Well, I was ten in 1954, and I think I read the book before I was
in high school, and it made a strong impression on me.
If you were ten in 1954 you must have been 17 and 18 when you
attended the two year Feynman lecture series for
At 11:56 AM 3/24/2010, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:34 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Well, I was ten in 1954, and I think I read the book before I was
in high school, and it made a strong impression on me.
If you were ten in 1954 you must have been 17 and 18 when you
Fits with your 159 IQ.
Back on topic, I understand why you are mad at Steve krivit for
pushing his POV that the heat/helium = 24 MeV/He is bogus, that's
because that correlation is what made you believe CF might well be
real. You don't want to doubt again.
Michel
2010/3/24 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Michel Jullian wrote:
Back on topic, I understand why you are mad at Steve krivit for
pushing his POV that the heat/helium = 24 MeV/He is bogus, that's
because that correlation is what made you believe CF might well be
real. You don't want to doubt again.
On behalf of Abd, let me say:
On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:29 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 11:56 AM 3/24/2010, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:34 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Well, I was ten in 1954, and I think I read the book before I was
in high school, and it made a strong impression on me.
If you
At 03:10 PM 3/24/2010, Michel Jullian wrote:
Fits with your 159 IQ.
Someone else is paying attention, I like that.
159 is not well enough established to be a reliable figure, it's
based on one test in high school. There are other signs, though,
judge for yourself. Be careful. It is very,
From Abd:
...
If the value turns out to be 48 MeV instead of 24, I'm
not offended at all. But I'll wonder what other products
there are in sufficient quantities to explain that. In
fact, if it's lower than 24, I'm not offended, it would
simply indicate other reactions besides those which
It's frightening to think that half of the people of the world have a
below average IQ!
T
(TiC)
At 03:42 PM 3/24/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
Back on topic, I understand why you are mad at Steve krivit for
pushing his POV that the heat/helium = 24 MeV/He is bogus, that's
because that correlation is what made you believe CF might well be
real. You don't want to doubt
At 03:53 PM 3/24/2010, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:29 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 11:56 AM 3/24/2010, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:34 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Well, I was ten in 1954, and I think I read the book before I was
in high school, and
At 05:24 PM 3/24/2010, Terry Blanton wrote:
It's frightening to think that half of the people of the world have a
below average IQ!
Complain to your congressperson! It's a shame how education is
neglected. On the other hand, they do seem to have this problem
addressed in Lake Woebegone.
On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:04 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Would you care to give your best guestamate (don't worry, I won't hold
you to it) on how much is theorized to be due to d+d = He+24 MeV, and
how much might be due to other processes?
Incidentally, to the rest of the Vort
Below-median IQ.
I wonder what percentage have above or below average IQs.
Does anyone know if IQ has a discovered genetic basis? What happens to IQ as a
person grows older?
On Mar 24, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
It's frightening to think that half of the people of the world
At 05:04 PM 3/24/2010, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Would you care to give your best guestamate (don't worry, I won't hold
you to it) on how much is theorized to be due to d+d = He+24 MeV, and
how much might be due to other processes?
Incidentally, to the rest of the Vort Collective,
Irv Dardik is no quack. He has developed an approach to human health and
performance that is based on extensive experience with the US Olympic effort,
an inquiring and astute mind, and a considerable track record. Like many new
things, it has its skeptics, but I've looked into it and it makes a
21 matches
Mail list logo
