Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Rich Murray
This detailed, specific critical list of many seemingly arbitrary data alterations in documents by Michael McKubre about a specific series of runs, that have been at times been cited as strong evidence for a predicted correlation of output heat with fusion of deuterium into helium within palladium

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Harry Veeder
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Harry Veeder wrote: > >> The background to this story is that Mitchell lSwartz does not approve of >> Jed Rothwell and Ed Storms content policy for the LENR library. > > > He may have said that, but we do not have a content policy. I wonder

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: > We have uploaded papers attacking the field, by leading skeptics such as > Steve Jones. . . . > > We have also uploaded a large number of papers that I personally think > have no scientific merit. They range from really bad to nonsense. > I do not wish to reopen a quarrel with Swart

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Harry Veeder wrote: The background to this story is that Mitchell lSwartz does not approve of > Jed Rothwell and Ed Storms content policy for the LENR library. > He may have said that, but we do not have a content policy. > They have said they prefer to include papers in the library which > w

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Harry Veeder
The background to this story is that Mitchell lSwartz does not approve of Jed Rothwell and Ed Storms content policy for the LENR library. They have said they prefer to include papers in the library which will raise the credibitily and respectability of the field ( and I don't just mean they prefer

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Daniel Rocha
Yes, I know the article was written by Larsen. I'm sorry that I was not clear, "the linked letter inside the article" should be "the linked letter inside the blog post". Anyway, Krivit endorses the opinion. 2011/12/22 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint > Daniel Rocha wrote: > > ** ** > > “Now, notice t

RE: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Daniel Rocha wrote: "Now, notice that Krivit declares "Holy War" against Cold Fusion here (notice that in the linked letter inside the article that most of the arguments are based on religious texts, only): http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/21/lenrs-versus-cold-fusion-and-the-s earch-for-

RE: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
Jed wrote: "Swartz sent me a similar letter when I quoted one of his papers and offered to upload it. He threatened legal action in words similar to this fax if I ever quote his papers or upload one. He sent me two messages like this. That is why I deleted his papers from ICCF Proceedings at LENR-

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: > All I know is that it sure wouldn't be in my own self-interest to look > for trouble. This strikes me as terribly reckless behavior. > It is particularly reckless when you can make every argument without including accusations of fraud. Krivit can say that

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
>From Akira, >> McKubre's M4 bogus experiment index: >> >> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/McKubre-Experiment-M4.shtml > > > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/20111221ToWhomItMayConcern.shtml > > In the above link it appears to me that Krivit is not just attacking > McKubre, but

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
This is awful. Krivit's attack on McKubre is beyond the pale. I do not want to say anything more about that. I do not want think about it. One thing though. I hesitate to rake over long-ago controversies, but I would like to point out something about this fax from Swartz to Krivit here: http://ne

RE: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
>From Akira: > -Original Message- > > McKubre's M4 bogus experiment index: > > > > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/McKubre-Experiment-M4.shtml > > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/20111221ToWhomItMayConcern.sh > tml > > In the above link it appears to me that Krivit is

Re: [Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-12-22 12:08, Daniel Rocha wrote: McKubre's M4 bogus experiment index: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/McKubre-Experiment-M4.shtml http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/20111221ToWhomItMayConcern.shtml In the above link it appears to me that Krivit is not just attacking

[Vo]:Krivit goes Berserk against "Cold Fusion" research to promote WL theory.

2011-12-22 Thread Daniel Rocha
I just noticed that Krivit just created a few pages that shows that he is declaring war against anyone that uses "Cold Fusion" name as a description to LENR. Dr. Mitchell Swartz page, disclosing personal email exchange: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/Swartz/Mitchell-Swartz-Cold-Fusion-Researcher