differ from your concept.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 8:55 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional
atomic crystals
Axil,
A few of your statements
be a fly on the void wall!
-mark
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:10 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic
crystals
I have considered what you are saying as being normal
Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
*Sent:* Monday, December 29, 2014 9:10 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional
atomic crystals
I have considered what you are saying as being normal Mark. Relative
motion of an atom to itself
as a consequence of the recent increased
replication activity.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Dec 30, 2014 2:04 am
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional
atomic crystals
orient the motion of any atoms inside…
Wish I could be a fly on the void wall!
-mark
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:10 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic
crystals
I
.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Dec 30, 2014 1:16 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in
two-dimensional atomic crystals
Suppose you imagine the atoms as stationary and imagine
@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional
atomic crystals
Can an atom have a temperature between its different parts?
Is an atom that is excited and about to emit a photon not quite hot?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, David Roberson dlrober
@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Dec 30, 2014 2:04 am
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in
two-dimensional atomic crystals
Can an atom have a temperature between its different parts?
Is an atom that is excited and about to emit a photon not quite hot?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014
: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in
two-dimensional atomic crystals
Can an atom have a temperature between its different parts?
Is an atom that is excited and about to emit a photon not quite hot?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
wrote
–matter coupling in
two-dimensional atomic crystals
Can an atom have a temperature between its different parts?
Is an atom that is excited and about to emit a photon not quite hot?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
wrote:
I have considered what you
In this email I mull over and ponder things, if this strikes you as too
long, please just read the below *bolded* and *italicized* *sentence*.
And to clarify, by enhancing the signal in the quantum vacuum, I mean
enhancing the wave function of the particle.
To use boats as an analogy, enhancing
a set of waves, the stronger the coupling between
them; the more discordant, the weaker the coupling.
-mark iverson
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 8:30 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional
atomic crystals
Mark, I see that I was not on the same page as you in this manner. Sorry if I
confused your concept.
I want to understand what you are referring to by asking a couple
could be a fly on the void wall!
-mark
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:10 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic
crystals
I have considered what you are saying as being
of binding energy and kinetic energy as well as linear momentum and
spin energy, but no temperature.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in
two
I said, “equivalent of 273degC of energy”
Meant to use Kelvin.
Correction, make that ~295degsK; room temp is ~22degC, 0C=273K, plus 22 = 295K.
-mi
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 7:54 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:FYI:
Casimir forces in a Plasma: Possible Connections to Yukawa Potentials
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.1032v1.pdf
Because of the vacuum energy, a plasma of virtual electron positron pairs
exists in the space between two subatomic particles. Mesons form as
excitons in this plasma. This is where pions
the coupling between
them; the more discordant, the weaker the coupling.
-mark iverson
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 8:30 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional
atomic crystals
Casimir forces
The more coherence between a set of waves, the stronger the coupling
between them; the more discordant, the weaker the coupling.
Ironically, as new external energy is fed into the BEC the coupling is
continually renewed.
That energy is nuclear binding energy and Fano resonance will continue to
The light/matter hybrid is a wave packet(photon) and the way wave packets
reach equal energy is unlike the complexity of atoms. The soliton formation
process involves both constructive and destructive interference of
waves. In a dark mode soliton formation, energy is not lost to the far
field in
Can an atom have a temperature between its different parts?
Is an atom that is excited and about to emit a photon not quite hot?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I have considered what you are saying as being normal Mark. Relative
motion of an atom
21 matches
Mail list logo
