differ from your concept.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 8:55 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional
atomic crystals
Axil,
A few of your statements
Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
*Sent:* Monday, December 29, 2014 9:10 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional
atomic crystals
I have considered what you are saying as being normal Mark. Relative
motion of an atom to itself
.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Dec 30, 2014 1:16 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in
two-dimensional atomic crystals
Suppose you imagine the atoms as stationary and imagine
@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional
atomic crystals
Can an atom have a temperature between its different parts?
Is an atom that is excited and about to emit a photon not quite hot?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, David Roberson dlrober
@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Dec 30, 2014 2:04 am
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in
two-dimensional atomic crystals
Can an atom have a temperature between its different parts?
Is an atom that is excited and about to emit a photon not quite hot?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014
: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in
two-dimensional atomic crystals
Can an atom have a temperature between its different parts?
Is an atom that is excited and about to emit a photon not quite hot?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
wrote
–matter coupling in
two-dimensional atomic crystals
Can an atom have a temperature between its different parts?
Is an atom that is excited and about to emit a photon not quite hot?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
wrote:
I have considered what you
In this email I mull over and ponder things, if this strikes you as too
long, please just read the below *bolded* and *italicized* *sentence*.
And to clarify, by enhancing the signal in the quantum vacuum, I mean
enhancing the wave function of the particle.
To use boats as an analogy, enhancing
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional
atomic crystals
Mark, I see that I was not on the same page as you in this manner. Sorry if I
confused your concept.
I want to understand what you are referring to by asking a couple
of binding energy and kinetic energy as well as linear momentum and
spin energy, but no temperature.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in
two
The more coherence between a set of waves, the stronger the coupling
between them; the more discordant, the weaker the coupling.
Ironically, as new external energy is fed into the BEC the coupling is
continually renewed.
That energy is nuclear binding energy and Fano resonance will continue to
11 matches
Mail list logo
