In reply to Bob Cook's message of Sun, 15 Nov 2015 14:34:43 -0800:
Hi Bob,
As I said, I'm just guessing. I don't believe or know anything for sure. The
idea that neutrons and protons are comprised of electrons and positrons is
interesting, though It makes me wonder about the stability of matter.
and minus charges.
>>
>> Bob Cook
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Axil Axil
>> *Sent:* Monday, November 16, 2015 9:31 AM
>> *To:* vortex-l
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe
>> together.
>>
>> Has anyone ever measured an elementary particle with a charge other than
>> an integer multiple of e?
>>
>> The Fractional Quantum Hall Effect
>>
>
>
Hotson's theory does go on to hypothesize on the sub-nucleonic structure of
the proton and neutron based upon arrangements of epos (shrunken
positronium), explains the nature of the strong force, is extended to
explain gravity and electromagnetic propagation. It explains the
experiment that is the
arged particles including
> combinations of plus and minus charges.
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
> *From:* Axil Axil
> *Sent:* Monday, November 16, 2015 9:31 AM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe
> together.
>
> Has any
The Fractional Quantum Hall Effect is presently a measurement in need of an
explanation. To my knowledge, no one is attributing fractional charge to
an individual elementary particle in attempted explanation of the data.
The theories seem to revolve around collective phenomena.
On Mon, Nov 16, 20
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 9:31 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe together.
Has anyone ever measured an elementary particle with a charge other than an
integer multiple of e?
The Fractional Quantum Hall Effect
: [Vo]:Re: The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe together.
The concept of the fractional charge quarks as constituents of matter is a
completely made-up story/hypothesis. Has anyone ever measured an elementary
particle with a charge other than an integer multiple of e? Hotson proposes
I have to say I like the idea. I have seen Hotson and Hatt mentioned here a few
times but must admit I don't know much about their theories. If they say all
fundemental particles are some form of electron in some kind of phase or state
do they also have an explanation for neutrinos? Sounds like
Has anyone ever measured an elementary particle with a charge other than an
integer multiple of e?
The Fractional Quantum Hall Effect
> On Nov 16, 2015, at 5:28, Stephen Cooke wrote:
>
> With spin at least I suppose the current numbering system has the advantage
> of easily distinguishing fermions and Bosons.
If we reindexed spin to be only integer multiples, fermions would have odd spin
and bosons even spin.
This idea ass
The concept of the fractional charge quarks as constituents of matter is a
completely made-up story/hypothesis. Has anyone ever measured an
elementary particle with a charge other than an integer multiple of e?
Hotson proposes that because of this the electron IS the one and only
fundamental parti
Interesting ideas and points about the numbering system. I wonder what would be
the best most meaningful fundamental numbering system to use.
With spin at least I suppose the current numbering system has the advantage of
easily distinguishing fermions and Bosons. And gives insights for fermion
: [Vo]:Re: The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe together.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
The question is whether the fractional charge that is associated with some
quarks actually exists as a separate entity in nature?
Instead of fractional charge, it's pos
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
The question is whether the fractional charge that is associated with some
> quarks actually exists as a separate entity in nature?
>
Instead of fractional charge, it's possible the "1/3," "2/3," etc., are an
artifact of our numbering system. Tha
2:46 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe
together.
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Thu, 12 Nov 2015 21:50:05 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
I would note that the total angular momentum of a system includes its
electron orbital angular momentum
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Thu, 12 Nov 2015 21:50:05 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>I would note that the total angular momentum of a system includes its electron
>orbital angular momentum and the intrinsic angular momentum of the electrons
>and the particles that make up a the nuclei of the system.
means that
each component, the orbital and the intrinsic angular momentum can only change
in increments of h/2pi.
Bob Cook
From: Eric Walker
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 9:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe together.
On Thu
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
Thanks for making that interesting paper available. I have always assumed
> that angular momentum of particles and systems can only change in discrete
> small amounts.
>
This reminds me (somewhat off on a tangent to the topic of this thread) --
Bob--
Thanks for making that interesting paper available. I have always assumed that
angular momentum of particles and systems can only change in discrete small
amounts.
The paper seems to make a point that this limit on how angular momentum can
change in a system of particles causes a cert
19 matches
Mail list logo
