On 2011-04-12 17:00, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I do not think he is more unwilling than usual.
Sorry for replying here only now.
The reason behind what I've written is that I'm noticing as time passes
that the amount of Can't answer and Already answered answers on his
blog has been increasing as
SHIRAKAWA Akira shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason behind what I've written is that I'm noticing as time passes
that the amount of Can't answer and Already answered answers on his blog
has been increasing as of late. The latter especially looks like a
convenient way to avoid
Not so much, I think- more an Sphinx without a secret- I think he has
found a very good method to activate nanometric Nickel- this method can
include additives or not- they can be called a catalyst or not- it is a
problem of definition. It is about a great density of NAE.
The problem is how to be
As I said to Jones Beene, Rossi is often secretive. You might say he is
openly secretive, meaning he makes no bones about the fact that he is hiding
information. That is partly what he did in his response to me, below.
He claims he can enrich Ni cheaply. It may be that he is lying about this.
But
On 2011-04-12 16:25, Jed Rothwell wrote:
As I said to Jones Beene, Rossi is often secretive. You might say he is
openly secretive, meaning he makes no bones about the fact that he is
hiding information. That is partly what he did in his response to me, below.
By the way, I'm under the
...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 7:37:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue
On 2011-04-12 16:25, Jed Rothwell wrote:
As I said to Jones Beene, Rossi is often secretive. You might say he is
openly secretive, meaning he makes no bones about
SHIRAKAWA Akira shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, I'm under the impression that Rossi has been made aware of
public technical discussions about his invention and on websites and mailing
lists like Vortex (or perhaps he even reads them himself) . . .
He has been aware of them all
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
Who do you think alerted him?
He does not need to be alerted. He is an experienced businessman. No one
makes a dime in business if he gives away his technical knowledge and trade
secrets for free.
I hope no one went up to him and told him to stop
Say noone noone . are you the Malloy character who was here a few years
ago, and could add little more than far-right rhetoric to any science
discussion?
Why should we care how furious a noone with noinsight to these issues, gets?
What's you real purpose on vortex - the next election?
]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
Who do you think alerted him?
He does not need to be alerted. He is an experienced businessman. No one makes
a
dime in business if he gives away his technical knowledge and trade secrets for
free.
I hope
Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 8:24:37 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue
Say “noone noone” … are you the Malloy character who was here a few years ago,
and could add little more than far-right rhetoric to any science discussion?
Why should we care how furious a noone
and for
others to duplicate the results and even build on them.
Dennis
From: noone noone
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:10 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue
I am not saying he should give away all the information.
For his sake, he should
No, I was not here a few years ago.
By the way, I'm not far right. I am a libertarian (no longer
affiliated with the party since they nominated Bob Barr the
biggest drug warrior in congress as their presidential
candidate) and Ron Paul supporter.
You should send 'political' or any other OT
From: noone noone
* I simply do not support illegal immigration. Opposing illegal immigration
and desiring those that invade the USA to be deported is not being xenophobic
at all…. My purpose on this list is to learn as much as I can about the Rossi
technology
Have you checked
completely - and get to building reactors, so as not to use the
blog as an excuse when he cannot deliver in time.
Jones
From: noone mailto:thesteornpa...@yahoo.com noone
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:10 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment
Dennis den...@netmdc.com wrote:
The answer, of course, is for him to have a patent application that fully
discloses his invention so that others skilled in the art can duplicate
his results.
He knows that. He now has a good patent attorney and he hopes to get a
patent soon. With a discovery
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
EXACTAMUNDO! He cannot have it both ways.
Of course he can it both ways! All discoverers and inventors do. ATT had it
both ways with the transistor; Edison with countless discoveries. The
discoverer wants people to replicate, sell the technology BUT he
I am trying to make sense out of these patents references that are included
in the Rossi patent. Why is Rossi referencing these other patents?
Current guiding
Or quite possibly the cheap Ni enrichment is actually the heart of the
process and the role of his secret catalyst is only to remove certain
isotopes.
Fran
On second thought, I may have been a bit hasty in claiming that Rossi was
disingenuous about his explanation of iron in the Cat-E reactor ash.
The majority of the iron might have come from the reaction vessel and
produced by spattering. However, not saying that a minority part was iron as
the
On 04/12/2011 10:25 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
As I said to Jones Beene, Rossi is often secretive. You might say he
is openly secretive, meaning he makes no bones about the fact that he
is hiding information. That is partly what he did in his response to
me, below.
He claims he can enrich Ni
!!!
From: peatbog peat...@teksavvy.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 9:27:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue
No, I was not here a few years ago.
By the way, I'm not far right. I am a libertarian (no longer
affiliated with the party since
to shut down the blog
completely - and get to building reactors, so as not to use the blog as an
excuse when he cannot deliver in time.
Jones
From:noone noone
Sent:Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:10 AM
To:vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject:Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue
I am not saying
Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
But then, how come the sample sent to the lab in Sweden wasn't enriched?
They tested the nickel and the copper and both appeared to be natural.
Was it a bogus sample?
Who knows. Maybe he uses enriched samples sometimes and sometimes not. Maybe
he
24 matches
Mail list logo
