RE: [Vo]:Test Message

generally recognized as being invented about 3200 BCE concerning a technology hopefully reaching the stage of practical implementation 'relatively' soon. It will work for me. Mason Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 21:29:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test Message From: jedrothw...@gmail.com To

Re: [Vo]:Test Message

Mason Ainsworth wrote: > Please respond if you don't get this.[image: Emoji] > How can you respond if you do not get something?! "Raise your hand if you absent from class." Perhaps you refer to the emoji (絵文字). That did not come through. This is a primitive mailing list. ASCII only. We do not

[Vo]:Test Message

First email to this list. Please respond if you don't get this.😉

[Vo]:test message

this is a test

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Test message reproducing the – problem

James Bowery wrote: Yep. > > Thank you, world's richest man. > Probably not Microsoft's fault. But hey, let't blame 'em! They are guilty of a lot of things. - Jed

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Test message reproducing the – problem

Yep. Thank you, world's richest man. On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:27 AM, James Bowery wrote: > A test response. > > > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, James Bowery wrote: > >> This is a test to determine whether the problem with response prefix >> explosion was caused by funny "windows" characte

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Test message reproducing the – problem

A test response. On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, James Bowery wrote: > This is a test to determine whether the problem with response prefix > explosion was caused by funny "windows" characters such as – > > which appeared in the title of the prior thread. >

[Vo]:Test message reproducing the – problem

This is a test to determine whether the problem with response prefix explosion was caused by funny "windows" characters such as – which appeared in the title of the prior thread.

Re: [Vo]:Test: Message sent from charter.net

a5.eskimo.com> References: <20101031153756.zoifw.9870566.r...@mp08> <201010312315.o9vnfepe017...@ultra5.eskimo.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:47:19 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [Vo]:Test: Message sent from charter.net From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson To: vortex-l Content-Ty

Re: [Vo]:Test: Message sent from charter.net

Bottom line, and my computer is crashing every five minutes, probably a bad power supply, you misread the bounce message. Eskimo problem, not a charter problem, per se. Read it again. At 09:47 AM 11/1/2010, Steven V Johnson wrote: BTW, it does not come back as "SPAM". I just get an innocuous

[Vo]:Test: Message sent from charter.net

>From Abd: > I want to throttle Charter. > Instead of throttling them, how about sending them what they want? > An example of a mail that bounced, as received by your google account. > You should sent complete headers. If you need a vortex mail with complete > headers, ask, one of us will send yo

Re: [Vo]:Test: Message sent from charter.net

At 03:37 PM 10/31/2010, OrionWorks wrote: My Charter.net email account is misbehaving and has been for over a week. Tells me all vortex-l messages are spam but I can locate the SPAM folder where presumably all the vortex-l messages have been shunted to. Charter sez I need to send a sample to t

[Vo]:Test: Message sent from charter.net

My Charter.net email account is misbehaving and has been for over a week. Tells me all vortex-l messages are spam but I can locate the SPAM folder where presumably all the vortex-l messages have been shunted to. Charter sez I need to send a sample to their special unblocking staff, but if I can

Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Strong suggestion, Jed: don't send large files or serious graphical data or > even tables requiring much formatting by email to a mailing list. > There is no point to using any HTML formatted tables, because mail.archive.com squashes the life out of the tables, as Horac

Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

Strong suggestion, Jed: don't send large files or serious graphical data or even tables requiring much formatting by email to a mailing list. Instead, put it on a web site, either for direct display or for file download. And then send the link. It is much more flexible and preserves email band

Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

try toobigtosend.com (joke) Harry __ Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to New Mail today or register for f

Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

2.3.4.5.6.7.8. 9 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012 345678901234567890 http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg37685.html [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4 Jed Rothwell Fri, 12 Fe

Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

Horace Heffner wrote: It came through nicely on my Mac. However, HTML in general, and graphics in particular, are not good in the archives. Graphics and some HTML or even rich text also do not show up properly at the online archives, www.mail-archive.com. Ouch.

Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg37685.html [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4 Jed Rothwell Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:08:37 -0800 I just tried this with three messages which were probably too big. I think 40 KB is the limit. Microsoft Word put this table out in HTML with eno

Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

many Microsoft users don't get properly via plain text, show up nicely in the archives. See: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg37685.html [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4 Jed Rothwell Fri, 1

Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

looks good to me. a LOT of people on this list use non html email readers though. On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Can the readers here see the two tables I just sent? > > The first one is from a spreadsheet output in HTML format. The second is > copied from an on-line arti

Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

Look fine. 40 kB is the *coded* limit. Mime encoding adds about 25% overhead. Word overhead over text on small messages is outrageous. That's why we made hypertext. T On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Can the readers here see the two tables I just sent? > > The first on

Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

Can the readers here see the two tables I just sent? The first one is from a spreadsheet output in HTML format. The second is copied from an on-line article. This is a neater, more readable way of posting tabular data here. Lots of overhead though . . . - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

Ah. That worked. Let me try HTML from on-line article: The following table shows just how much more people consume in a serving today compared to people in the 50s: *Serving Sizes Then and Now**Food or beverage**1950s**Expanded 2003 portion*French fries 2.4 ounces up to 7.1 ouncesFountain soda 7.0

[Vo]:Test message with tabular data 4

I just tried this with three messages which were probably too big. I think 40 KB is the limit. Microsoft Word put this table out in HTML with enormous overhead. This version is prepared with an HTML editor. Britz database stats Res+Res-Res0NoYearTotalPositiveNegativeUndecidedEvaluationPositive