In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:29:59 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
15 kW for 18 hours at 5 MeV / reaction equates to 120 mg of Nickel. IOW the
amount that would actually react is 120 mg.
I gather you are suggesting that much of the Ni will eventually
On 2011-04-14 01:16, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[...] We could organize this info in a Wiki, with categories: Materials,
Operation method, Performance characteristics . . . [...]
This is a good idea and I was thinking exactly about it yesterday when I
sent that list to the group. The end result
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
ANSWER: THE PUMP IS A PERISTALTIC PUMP. THE FLOW OF WATER HAS BEEN
MEASURED BEFORE TURNING ON THE REACTOR BY THE PROFESSORS WHO MADE
THE TEST, BY OPENING THE CIRCUIT AND CHRONOMETRING THE AMOUNT OF WATER
THAT FILLED UP A RESERVOIR OF 1 LITER.
Note that the flow
I wrote:
I think this refers to the Jan. 14 test. What Rossi is saying here is that
they left the reservoir on a weight scale (as you see in the photos), and
they measured the total reduction in weight over the course of the run. This
method is as good as collecting the output flow.
Okay,
Dear Jed,
In most European languages (e.g. German, Dutch, Italian, French,
Spanish) 100,000 mg means actually 100.000 mg and vice versa.
It is the English language that is in this case the odd one out, which
causes sometime hilarious conversions!
B.t.w. Rossi would otherwise probably have
Man on Bridges manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
In most European languages (e.g. German, Dutch, Italian, French, Spanish)
100,000 mg means actually 100.000 mg and vice versa.
I am reviewing these statements. I now think he meant there are milligram
level amounts of nuclear-active Ni. There is
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
It is awesome that 100 g of any material can produce 15 kW to 130 kW. If
only a tiny fraction of it -- a few milligrams -- is active, that goes
beyond awesome.
Well, there *is* this stuff called antimatter. :-)
T
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:24:45 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
15 kW for 18 hours at 5 MeV / reaction equates to 120 mg of Nickel. IOW the
amount that would actually react is 120 mg.
Man on Bridges manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
In most European languages (e.g. German, Dutch,
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
15 kW for 18 hours at 5 MeV / reaction equates to 120 mg of Nickel. IOW the
amount that would actually react is 120 mg.
I gather you are suggesting that much of the Ni will eventually react,
but in the 18-hour experiment only 120 mg did react. The rest is
unburned
This was formerly titled What We Know from Rossi. It is a list of major
assertions made by Rossi and others, mainly Rossi in his blog
1) The catalyst is not copper.
2) The catalyst is not iron.
3) The catalyst is not a precious metal.
4) The catalyst is not radioactive.
5) The catalyst is not
On 2011-04-13 23:00, Jed Rothwell wrote:
This was formerly titled What We Know from Rossi. It is a list of major
assertions made by Rossi and others, mainly Rossi in his blog
You made me remember that a few weeks ago I started writing down (or
more like, copy/pasting) a list of questions
13, 2011 2:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:What Rossi Says list
This was formerly titled What We Know from Rossi. It is a list of major
assertions made by Rossi and
others, mainly Rossi in his blog
1) The catalyst is not copper.
2) The catalyst is not iron.
3) The catalyst
From Mark:
Rossi: No radioactivity has been found in the residual metals, it is true,
but the day after the stop of the operation. In any case you are right, if
59-Cu is formed from 58-Ni we should have the couples of 511 keV at 180° and
we never found them, while we found keV in the range of
SHIRAKAWA Akira shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
You made me remember that a few weeks ago I started writing down (or more
like, copy/pasting) a list of questions answered by Rossi on his blog . . .
Yikes, what a lot of work!
When he refuses to answer that may be as telling as when he
20) process can be killed by forced cooling (high water flow)
--
NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen!
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Angela Kemmler angela.kemm...@gmx.de wrote:
20) process can be killed by forced cooling (high water flow)
Don't forget Nitrogen injection. Note the N2 tank in his original test.
T
Angela Kemmler angela.kemm...@gmx.de wrote:
20) process can be killed by forced cooling (high water flow)
That probably means sudden cooling or what is called a thermal shock.
Other researchers have said this is one way to quench a reaction.
I mean that if you gradually increase the flow
In reply to SHIRAKAWA Akira's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:12:59 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Conservatively, I would say 0,01 g/kWh of Ni is the actual demand of Ni
is necessary, even if the mass that really reacts is in the order of
picograms.
I think he's talking about actual mass to energy
I am going to print Shirakawa-san's list and add some items. I will
annotate them SL (Shirakawa List)
There are some repetitions and many questions Rossi refuses to answer.
Lots of interesting stuff too.
We could organize this info in a Wiki, with categories: Materials,
Operation method,
In reply to SHIRAKAWA Akira's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:12:59 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
The question is; how can the 6.15MeV mass-energy increase of
62Ni+p-63Cu account for a total binding energy increase of 8.7MeV, and
yet also be exothermic?
The difference in *total* binding energy is 6.12 MeV,
In reply to SHIRAKAWA Akira's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:12:59 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
ANSWER: THE PUMP IS A PERISTALTIC PUMP. THE FLOW OF WATER HAS BEEN
MEASURED BEFORE TURNING ON THE REACTOR BY THE PROFESSORS WHO MADE THE
TEST, BY OPENING THE CIRCUIT AND CHRONOMETRING THE AMOUNT OF WATER THAT
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2011
16:30:59 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
From Mark:
Rossi: No radioactivity has been found in the residual metals, it is true,
but the day after the stop of the operation. In any case you are right, if
59-Cu is formed from 58-Ni we
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:26:35 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
I should add that x-rays resulting from these electrons could easily lie in this
range.
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2011
16:30:59 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
From Mark:
Rossi:
23 matches
Mail list logo
