At 01:45 am 21-02-05 -0600, you wrote:
snip
I've been reading about the Yuri Popatov's Yusmar machine, which
AFAIK, produces LENR's in an aquas solution by means of a vortex.
Heat is a big item with Russians, and electricity costs something
there too. The fact that he has lots of orders for
thomas malloy wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Ed Storms responded'
Once again, we are being treated to one more example of exaggeration
and BS. The Taleyarkhan cavitation work is hot fusion occurring in
bubbles, not cold fusion.
I don't understand how hot fusion in bubbles differs from what the
thomas malloy wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Ed Storms responded'
I've been reading about the Yuri Popatov's Yusmar machine, which
AFAIK, produces LENR's in an aquas solution by means of a vortex.
Heat is a big item with Russians, and electricity costs something
there too. The fact that he has
Thomas,
I don't understand how hot fusion in bubbles differs from what the other
LERN researchers are doing,
I've written about this in detail in my book, and also in part, in two
articles in the New Energy Times newsletter #8
http://newenergytimes.com/news/8.htm . Search on bubble and
thomas malloy wrote:
Ed Storms responded'
Once again, we are being treated to one more example of exaggeration
and BS. The Taleyarkhan cavitation work is hot fusion occurring in
bubbles, not cold fusion.
I don't understand how hot fusion in bubbles differs from what the other
LERN
thomas malloy wrote:
Ed Storms responded'
Once again, we are being treated to one more example of
exaggeration and BS. The Taleyarkhan cavitation work is hot
fusion occurring in bubbles, not cold fusion.
I don't understand how hot fusion in bubbles differs from what the
other LERN researchers
[It is absurd that these people think a claim can be
disproved with a single experiment! And if they do not really believe
that, they should not say it, because people viewing the television will
believe them. - JR]
Horizon
Thu 17 Feb, 9:00 pm - 9:50 pm 50mins (BBC2)
An Experiment to Save the
Gnorts,
Taleyarkhan has been doing cavitation experiments for over thirty years, Jed.
Knuke
Am Donnerstag, 17. Februar 2005 16:47 schrieb Jed Rothwell:
[It is absurd that these people think a claim can be disproved with a
single experiment! And if they do not really believe that, they should not
Michael Huffman wrote:
Gnorts,
Taleyarkhan has been doing cavitation experiments for over thirty years,
Jed.
And the BBC has been doing them for -- what? -- six weeks? And yet they
claim:
If the experiment works, then the world could be on
the way to a new form of cheap, unlimited, pollution
Ahoy Knuke,
Taleyarkhan has been doing cavitation experiments for over
thirty years,
Even so, it was a big mistake, and typical mainstream
arrogance, that in all the publicity that Taleyarkhan
recieved (riding on the ORNL coat-tails) that he did not
credit nor even mention the extraordinary
Horizon to feature Taleyarkhan
Michael Huffman wrote:
Gnorts,
Taleyarkhan has been doing cavitation experiments for over thirty years, Jed.
And the BBC has been doing them for -- what? -- six weeks? And yet they claim:
If the experiment works, then the world could be on the way to a new form
At 10:47 am 17-02-05 -0500, you wrote:
[It is absurd that these people think a claim can be disproved with a
single experiment! And if they do not really believe that, they should not
say it, because people viewing the television will believe them. - JR]
Horizon
Thu 17 Feb, 9:00 pm - 9:50 pm
of LENR finally come out? I for one am
getting kind
of sick of the dreaming
K.
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:05 PM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: BBC Horizon to feature Taleyarkhan
Michael Huffman wrote
Moin Moin!
I'm just glad (and a bit surprised, actually) to see Taleyarkhan's work being
examined at all. I read very vague references to his work when I first
started researching cavitation in 1993, and that was in the form of some BBS
messages or something. It wasn't even on the internet.
have !). Caveat: this criticism relates to the first ORNL
announcement and they may have issued an addenda, but if so,
it didn't make the news.
I am told that the second paper addressed the criticism from the first
paper:
http://newenergytimes.com/news/8.htm#impulsedevices
s
Given a moment to reflect on ALL of the
circumstances...DUH... one should always follow the buck
first and ask questions later.
Even so, it was a big mistake, and typical mainstream
arrogance, that in all the publicity that Taleyarkhan
recieved (riding on the ORNL coat-tails) that he did not
At 10:44 am 17-02-05 -0700, you wrote:
Once again, we are being treated to one
more example of exaggeration and BS.
The Taleyarkhan cavitation work is hot
fusion occurring in bubbles,
snip
or cold fusion occuring in Beta-aether
vacua cavities. 8^)
Grimer
I think it's easier not to confuse cold fusion with hot fusion by
introducing the Beta-ether concept. We have enough trouble just talking
about what is known without introducing what is unknown. Cold fusion
describes nuclear reactions that take place in special atomic lattices
without
Amen!
Ludivine Sagnier made a much more exciting Tinker than Julia Roberts:
http://www.themakeupgallery.info/fantasy/elf/ppan.htm
Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep Tinker-bell alive!
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
- Original Message -
From: Michael Huffman
Actually, I think that I am confusing Taleyarkhan with an
earlier researcher with a similar name. I did a quick
Google, and came up with a paper at:
http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/hottopics/bubble/1067589.pdf
Hey, along similar
20 matches
Mail list logo
