I wonder wether all present powder will be active at once. It seems only
part of the the powder is in an active state.
If all powder is in an active state all the time, COP will decrease over
time as the material is 'consumed'. This would mean, in the case of an
e-cat, COP is only 6 in the initial
Rossi must keep the COP at or below 6 to avoid reaction meltdown. The LENR
reaction must be controlled to avoid the disruption consequences of
infinite COP.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
I wonder wether all present powder will be active at
I am aware.
But to keep COP of 6 this either means over time, due to the reduced amount
of nickel ( it is slowly 'consumed') the temperature of the remaining
nickel has to be increased, or, the available nickel is only a part of the
nickel is active at the time.
If the temperature of the reduced
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Jun 10, 2013 4:58 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Heat pipes
I am aware.
But to keep COP of 6 this either means over time, due to the reduced amount of
nickel ( it is slowly 'consumed') the temperature of the remaining nickel has
to be increased, or, the available
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Heat pipes
I am aware.
But to keep COP of 6 this either means over time, due to the reduced
amount of nickel ( it is slowly 'consumed') the temperature of the
remaining nickel has to be increased, or, the available nickel is only a
part of the nickel is active at the time
Your criteria must be achieved if Rossi is telling the truth. I am not sure of
how many aces he has up his sleeve.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Jun 10, 2013 5:31 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Heat pipes
The positive
By the way, one of the reasons that the helium cooled pebble bed reactor
design never made it in the utility nuclear reactor marketplace was its
poor power density and “economies of scale” characteristics compared to
light water reactor designs.
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Axil Axil
Major problem is that it is hot powder than needs to transfer its heat. It
simply has a bad contact with the heat exchanger.
The heat transfer contact is very good because it is made by quantum
effects caused by the BEC. I believe that the powder is super-fluidic. That
means that the hydrogen gas and the powder and maybe even the containment
tube are the same temperature (exothermic).
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:16 PM,
Pumping hydrogen through hot granulated uranium metal? No wonder there is a
reaction. And the negative feedback UH3 moderator theory sounds a bit vague.
If this was developed in the 1950s as an enhanced trigger in the
Upshot-Knothole tests - then LLNL may have stumbled upon LENR without
Someday a 50 to 100 kilowatt lithium based heat tube integrated heat pipe
and LERN reaction chamber whose dimensions are an inch in diameter and a
foot long made of zirconium. It will be connected to a vapor heat transfer
bus to the heat exchanger and serviceable by hot swap out.
This heat pipe
Rossi would need a container ship to do the same thing. This is not good
for a utility.
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Someday a 50 to 100 kilowatt lithium based heat tube integrated heat pipe
and LERN reaction chamber whose dimensions are an inch in
Early Los Alamos heat pipes contained water or sodium. In the mid-1980s,
Los Alamos developed a lithium heat pipe that transferred heat energy at a
power density of 23 kilowatts per square centimeter—to understand the
intensity of that amount of heat energy, consider that the heat emitted
from the
Why are light power dense LENR power plants necessary?
A Boeing 747 engine produces 25 megawatts of power per combustion turbine.
Twenty-five megawatts is the equivalent of about 33,500 horsepower. The
Pratt Whitney jet engines used in Boeing 747s produce about 55,000 pounds
of thrust on
Yes, apparently safe (although using UZrH not UH3).
What I was questioning is whether the hydrogen desorbtion at high temperature
really does control the reaction by changing the neutron moderation rate, or
whether something else is happening (which equally controls reaction rate).
It is not
you might want to look back at my Jun 4 vortex post under a couple hundred
bucks...
I am working on using heat pipes to extract heat.
I have having to use a variable heat conductive path.
You have to balance the heat extraction with the keeping the system at working
temperature.
I have been
I assumed one could control the flow of vapor by using some sort of
computer controlled valve with and adjustable opening capability. Am I
wrong in that assumption?
A microcontroller can supervise the temperature of N number of heat pipes
if the polling cycle is fast enough. A very good heat
my problem has been if I get the heat out too fast, then the reaction stops.
These things like to stay warm.
I do not have the technical ablity to make many massive control systems.
I am doing well just to have one path and one system
D2
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 18:22:39 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo
18 matches
Mail list logo
