yes, they not only stick together, but they usually melt together when I try to
use them. That is why I had to move to nano material held in C or silica. I
ended up with just a blob of metal that eventually quite working. at least
for me.
D2
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 12:49:17 -0400
That is probably why Defkalion indicates they have such high percentage of
'Light elements' in their reactor content :
see page: 4, 5 of
http://www.slideshare.net/ssusereeef70/2012-0813-iccf17-paperdgtgx
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:23 PM, DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
yes, they not
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
yes, they not only stick together, but they usually melt together when I
try to use them.
That is why Arata put them in a structure of non-reacting Zr. To hold the
particles apart, you might say.
Takahashi says they are not melting. Hydrogen reactions
where I want
them (normally 9 nm for mesopore C).
D2
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:48:02 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot nanoparticles stick together.
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
yes, they not only stick together, but they usually melt
them (normally 9 nm for mesopore C).
D2
--
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:48:02 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot nanoparticles stick together.
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
yes, they not only stick together
current
through it and it makes the size of metal particles right about where I want
them (normally 9 nm for mesopore C).
D2
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:48:02 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot nanoparticles stick together.
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
DJ Cravens djcrav
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
Pd seems to work at lower temps than Ni work. (lower Ef).
Many people have observed that lately. It is important. It may explain why
most early attempts to replicate Mills failed. It would explain why an
electrochemical Ni experiment will probably not
Mills had a light water - nickel electrochemical cell in 1991.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/3620review.shtml
They were reported as:
(a) they have very short initiation times, i.e., the excess power,
if present, appears within the first day of electrolysis and (b) the
success rate
Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
Mills had a light water - nickel electrochemical cell in 1991.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/3620review.shtml
They were reported as:
(a) they have very short initiation times, i.e., the excess power,
if present, appears within the first
: [Vo]:Hot nanoparticles stick together.
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
Pd seems to work at lower temps than Ni work. (lower Ef).
Many people have observed that lately. It is important. It may explain why most
early attempts to replicate
I have a feeling that Mills got his to work because his Ni had surface
contamination of something like Cu or Sn which would drop the Debye temp and Ef.
D2
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:38:20 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot nanoparticles stick together.
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l
From: Jed Rothwell
DJ Cravens wrote:
Pd seems to work at lower temps than Ni work. (lower Ef).
Many people have observed that lately. It is important. It
may explain why most early attempts to
They (Defkalion) also mentioned using foam metal in the most recent demo
(not nano-particles).
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
That is probably why Defkalion indicates they have such high percentage of
'Light elements' in their reactor content :
The encase the particles in a metal foam. This is the same idea that Dr.
Cravens uses with carbon.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
They (Defkalion) also mentioned using foam metal in the most recent demo
(not nano-particles).
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at
14 matches
Mail list logo
