more than being probably correct as you conclude, this experiment unlike
Lugano can be reproduced and thus improved.
The protocol is more clean, involve less manual phases, so with a plan ans
some samples a third party should probably replicate.
anyway maybe there is some accidental unnoticed
Someone pointed out to me that the T3 malfunction does not appear to be
temperature related. T3 starts to go haywire around 1050°C, at around 15:00.
You can zoom in on the slides here and see that kind of detail:
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/Jiang%20DATA%202015-May-04%20to%20May-07.pdf
-
Jiang's last message to me confirmed that T2 finally bit the dust:
We hope[d] to calibrate T2 after experiment, but when cooling down to
150°C,T2 was working abnormal,and T2 finally died on 11 May, temperture to
zero.
*My conclusion*
I think there was excess heat on May 5. Based on T1 (red
_
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: mercredi 3 juin 2015 21:15
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jiang slides Fig. 6
Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be wrote:
BUT,
At point A, the power is lesser than at B, but temperature is higher! We
: Re: [Vo]:Jiang slides Fig. 6
Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be wrote:
Another point, the T2 thermocouple has been to a temperature far above what
chromel or alumel can survive to. The temperature of T2 increased far above
1400°C.
How do you know that? The line is cut off at 1300°C
Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be wrote:
Look at the speed of rise when it reached 1300°C. It is just not like as
it will stop at 1301°C … The event was very strong. Chromel (Ni80%, Cr20%)
melts at 1420°C.
Oh. I guess that is not far above 1300°C. I see your point.
- Jed
Jiang, who is very helpful, clarified some issues:
Channel 4 is Pressure. Channels 5 and 8 are not in use. T4 was being
cooled to the temperature down to 100°C by a fan, T4 is used only for
monitoring ambient temperature.
That explains why T4 did not respond much to the excess heat.
- Jed
Jiang sent me a cleaner version of his Fig. 6 data. I will translate the
headings and annotate this later. See:
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/Jiang%20DATA%202015-May-04%20to%20May-07.pdf
Below the x-axis it just says Channel 01, Channel 02 . . . I am not sure
what channel is what. I think it
the breakdown can not be trusted
anymore. A new experiment with type B thermocouples (T2 and T3) should be
redone before stating any conclusions of excess heat.
_
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: mercredi 3 juin 2015 16:58
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jiang
Thank you Jed for the info you share with us.
What concern me here in this test is that T1(red) has not the same behaviour
before and after that T3(blue) has broken. For the same voltage (cyan), the
maximum temperature reported by T1 aren’t correlated with an excess heat
occurring. If an
10 matches
Mail list logo
