In reply to noone noone's message of Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:18:32 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>Krivit and other worshippers of Widom Larsen theory do not make any sense. The
>reaction is not a weak interaction, but a fusion reaction. The neutrons are
>supposed to be protons and electrons that become vi
Noteworthy that Krivit's 200 page report included detailed
contributions by 25 volunteer experts, who showed a broad consensus
for a skeptical assessment about excess energy...
So it's not just Krivit...
Not included --
thermal electrochemical corrosion of the electric input power heating
resis
I sed:
> I perceive Mr. Krivit as working very hard at the task of being the
> best investigative journalist that he can be. I think he may still
> achieve that goal.
I just realized that the way I stated the above could imply that I
don't perceive Mr. Krivit as possessing very good journalistic
Terry sez:
> The truly progressive cynic eventually forms a crusty chrysalis
> from which eventually emerges a jaded dung beetle.
IMHO, a truly progressive cynic has a sense of humor. Some cynics make
marvelous comedians.
About a year ago I recall Mr. Krivit demanding that Mr. Rothwell
publicly
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:12 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson <
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Being a cynic is neither good or bad. It's what one does with one's
> innate sense of cynicism that determines whether honoring such a
> perception of their surroundings serves them (and their r
Some would like to characterize Krivit as a "snake".
Rossi, particularly.
In my view Krivit is simply a cynic.
Being a cynic is neither good or bad. It's what one does with one's
innate sense of cynicism that determines whether honoring such a
perception of their surroundings serves them (and th
Inspired by Krivit's nonsense.
Krivit has been out to try and discredit Rossi for a long time. He truly is a
"snake."
From: Mark Iverson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 6:26 PM
Subject: [Vo]:PhysOrg reports on Krivit's latest article...
and
electron put on a mask, they are no longer a proton and neutron.
From: Bastiaan Bergman
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:PhysOrg reports on Krivit's latest article...
Can somebody explain me how,
"it
minds trying to claim the
theory does not produce fusion.
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:11 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:PhysOrg reports on Krivit's latest article...
>From Bergman
> Can som
>From Bergman
> Can somebody explain me how,
> "it is likely a weak interaction involving neutrons, without fusion"
> could possibly gain energy? And where do these neutrons come from?
> It looks like people are more skeptical on the claim 'cold fusion'
> than on the claim that 'abra-ca-dabra' can
Bastiaan Bergman wrote:
Can somebody explain me how,
> "it is likely a weak interaction involving neutrons, without fusion"
> could possibly gain energy? And where do these neutrons come from?
> It looks like people are more skeptical on the claim 'cold fusion'
> than on the claim that 'abra-ca-d
Can somebody explain me how,
"it is likely a weak interaction involving neutrons, without fusion"
could possibly gain energy? And where do these neutrons come from?
It looks like people are more skeptical on the claim 'cold fusion'
than on the claim that 'abra-ca-dabra' can actually do something.
12 matches
Mail list logo