Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote: > The reason behind what I've written is that I'm noticing as time passes > that the amount of "Can't answer" and "Already answered" answers on his blog > has been increasing as of late. The latter especially looks like a > convenient way to avoid addressing new issues to

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

On 2011-04-12 17:00, Jed Rothwell wrote: I do not think he is more unwilling than usual. Sorry for replying here only now. The reason behind what I've written is that I'm noticing as time passes that the amount of "Can't answer" and "Already answered" answers on his blog has been increasing

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

Not so much, I think- more an "Sphinx without a secret"- I think he has found a very good method to activate nanometric Nickel- this method can include additives or not- they can be called a catalyst or not- it is a problem of definition. It is about a great density of NAE. The problem is how to b

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > But then, how come the sample sent to the lab in Sweden wasn't enriched? > They tested the nickel and the copper and both appeared to be "natural". > Was it a bogus sample? > Who knows. Maybe he uses enriched samples sometimes and sometimes not. Maybe he thinks it

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

old him to shutup, but his engineering mindset told him to keep talking! I think Rossi is probably going through the same thing. From: Jones Beene To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 10:06:04 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrich

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

r the info!!! From: peatbog To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 9:27:30 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue > No, I was not here a few years ago. > > By the way, I'm not far right. I am a libertarian (no longer > affiliated with the party si

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

On 04/12/2011 10:25 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > As I said to Jones Beene, Rossi is often secretive. You might say he > is openly secretive, meaning he makes no bones about the fact that he > is hiding information. That is partly what he did in his response to > me, below. > > He claims he can enric

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

On second thought, I may have been a bit hasty in claiming that Rossi was disingenuous about his explanation of iron in the Cat-E reactor ash. The majority of the iron might have come from the reaction vessel and produced by spattering. However, not saying that a minority part was iron as the ac

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

I am trying to make sense out of these patents references that are included in the Rossi patent. Why is Rossi referencing these other patents? "Current guiding system"

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

Jones Beene wrote: EXACTAMUNDO! He cannot have it both ways. > Of course he can it both ways! All discoverers and inventors do. AT&T had it both ways with the transistor; Edison with countless discoveries. The discoverer wants people to replicate, sell the technology BUT he also wants a share of

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

Dennis wrote: > The answer, of course, is for him to have a patent application that fully > discloses his invention so that others "skilled in the art" can duplicate > his results. > He knows that. He now has a good patent attorney and he hopes to get a patent soon. With a discovery of this nat

RE: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

that can happen for the field - is for him to shut down the blog completely - and get to building reactors, so as not to use the blog as an excuse when he cannot deliver in time. Jones From: noone <mailto:thesteornpa...@yahoo.com> noone Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:10

RE: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

From: noone noone * I simply do not support illegal immigration. Opposing illegal immigration and desiring those that invade the USA to be deported is not being xenophobic at all…. My purpose on this list is to learn as much as I can about the Rossi technology Have you checked Ro

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

> No, I was not here a few years ago. > > By the way, I'm not far right. I am a libertarian (no longer > affiliated with the party since they nominated Bob Barr the > biggest drug warrior in congress as their presidential > candidate) and Ron Paul supporter. You should send 'political' or any oth

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

getting a patent and for others to duplicate the results and even build on them. Dennis From: noone noone Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:10 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue I am not saying he should give away all the information. For his

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

, April 12, 2011 8:24:37 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue Say “noone noone” … are you the Malloy character who was here a few years ago, and could add little more than far-right rhetoric to any science discussion? Why should we care how furious a noone with noinsigh

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

. But from another point of view the world needs it badly (billions of people vs. Rossi) and I think people should think about that before warning him. From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 8:09:06 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi

RE: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

Say "noone noone" . are you the Malloy character who was here a few years ago, and could add little more than far-right rhetoric to any science discussion? Why should we care how furious a noone with noinsight to these issues, gets? What's you real purpose on vortex - the next election?

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

noone noone wrote: Who do you think alerted him? > He does not need to be alerted. He is an experienced businessman. No one makes a dime in business if he gives away his technical knowledge and trade secrets for free. > > I hope no one went up to him and told him to stop sharing information.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote: By the way, I'm under the impression that Rossi has been made aware of > public technical discussions about his invention and on websites and mailing > lists like Vortex (or perhaps he even reads them himself) . . . He has been aware of them all along. I have copied many

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 7:37:01 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue On 2011-04-12 16:25, Jed Rothwell wrote: > As I said to Jones Beene, Rossi is often secretive. You might say he is > openly secretive, meaning he makes no bones about the fact that he is &g

Re: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue

On 2011-04-12 16:25, Jed Rothwell wrote: As I said to Jones Beene, Rossi is often secretive. You might say he is openly secretive, meaning he makes no bones about the fact that he is hiding information. That is partly what he did in his response to me, below. By the way, I'm under the impressio