MFMP's instrumentation error is currently of about 10%. If they had excess
heat in the last experiment it unfortunately was within the measurement
error... What we need (considering keeping the current setup), then, is a
high amount of excess heat.
Typically, nuclear reactions need a certain
I believe that this last MFMP experiement is suffering from a undersized
fuel load. But a larger fuel load will most likely blowout the alumina tube
when the temperature hits the 600C critical temperature. The energy burst
from from a larger fuel load when the reactor hits that critical temperture
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Alberto De Souza
alberto.investi...@gmail.com wrote:
It is important to note, though, that this offset was not observed during
this initial test.
Perhaps obvious to electrical engineers that this kind of thing can
happen. But an excellent lesson for those of
Bad news... From MFMP Facebook page: Re-heat of *GlowStick* GS3 reveals
scalar offset between active and null.
It require some analysis, but the offset is about as high as the difference
in temperature observed during the test that (apparently?) showed excess
heat... It is important to note,
Hi Alberto:
Great job on the plotting. I am going to refrain commenting about excess
heat at this time, but I have a few suggestions/comments:
1) It is my understanding that the Coil Resistance is 8.5 ohms cold (Room
Temperature) and the largest value I heard Alan mention during the
5 matches
Mail list logo
