[Vo]:Re: FWF, ZPE Five

2007-11-28 Thread Michel Jullian
- Original Message - From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com; Frederick Sparber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 6:27 PM Subject: [Vo]:FWF, ZPE Five In his Fifth Force paper, R. Mills of BLP says however the electron itself is

Re: [Vo]:FWF, ZPE Five

2007-11-28 Thread OrionWorks
Jones, Having been a semi-passive lurker at Luke's Hydrino discussion group for many years I've kept loose tabs on the recent Fifth Force discussion. Needless to say, and as you have pointed out, John E. Connett (aka Nora B.) and Dr. Z. are do not appear to be terribly impressed with Dr. Mills'

Re: [Vo]:FWF, ZPE Five

2007-11-28 Thread Taylor J. Smith
Hi All, I'm having a hard time getting my mind around the fifth force, but I find Don Hotson's explication of Dirac's epos helpful. (These epos entirely filling the universe make a plausible basis for action at a distance, but so far I'm sticking to graavitons that travel orders of magnitude

Re: [Vo]:FWF, ZPE Five

2007-11-28 Thread R.C.Macaulay
Howdy Jones, Interesting stuff you write, as always, more questions than answers but that's what makes the mind function. Once watched an aurora video shot at the south pole.The thought came that a sustained video over a month's time fed into a computer for analysis may provide an

Re: [Vo]:Re: FWF, ZPE Five

2007-11-28 Thread Jones Beene
Michel Jullian wrote: Mmmm... it seems to me that even without the help of a fifth force you would expect the electrons to carry whatever they are attached to up, by simple coulombic force Fc=q*E (E = -grad V goes from positive to negative i.e. down, and q is negative, so Fc goes up) I did