On Jun 17, 2009, at 3:12 PM, John Berry wrote:
Well you could have just said true.
That would be nonsense since I strongly disagree with you on almost
every point you make. It appears debating would be senseless
though, and inconsiderate of others.
I would like to point out as a
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
I don't see the problem. All such subjects already have breathing
room. If you want to post on a subject then post on the subject. If
anyone has interest in contributing they will post on it.
There's a 100% replicable CF experiment. People on
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 3:12 PM, John Berry wrote:
Well you could have just said true.
That would be nonsense since I strongly disagree with you on almost every
point you make.
I think you misunderstand me.
After
John Berry wrote:
Piece of cake. The only thing preventing it is politics and lack of
knowledge.
I guess we have different opinions on how plausible a change of politics
is, or for that matter getting the right knowledge to the right places.
I mean that technically making small scale
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
John Berry wrote:
I do not think a skilled amateur or professional can contribute anything to
cold fusion without access to a fully equipped profession grade laboratory
and hundreds of thousands of dollars of
So, individually, we stand almost no chance of contributing anything to cold
fusion, nor has any particularly practical way been conceived to power a
vehicle with it.(??!)
Many of us have to worry about having any savings, job or retirement at all,
much less hundreds of thousands for a
To avoid making yourself ill with worry, let me add a bit of
optimism. Cold fusion has left the garage level of research and
entered the level of a well funded laboratory. This is progress. The
theory has left the amateur level of ideas and entered the level of
the trained professional.
From: John Berry
Jones, have you read my variable capacitor post, subject: On Topic in any
detail?
If so can I have your opinion on it? I think it was you that actually
identified the
patent co-invented by JLN?
Cannot comment on that now due to a contractual agreement, John - but would
The theory has left the amateur level of ideas and entered the level of the
trained professional. This is also progress
Ed
So, individually, we stand almost no chance of contributing anything to cold
fusion, nor has any particularly practical way been conceived to power a
vehicle with
Well Frank, such ideas have value only when they show why and how most
observed behaviors occur and how to make the behavior occur more
consistently and at higher levels. All theories I know about met only
a small fraction of this requirement. If you can have better success
in this
Here is the Rex Research article on Hiddink:
http://www.rexresearch.com/hiddink/hiddink.htm
Terry
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Kyle
Mcallisterkyle_mcallis...@yahoo.com wrote:
V, and John Berry in particular,
Figured I should make a more aptly titled thread for this, as Enough
Already
I saw it and followed the link ... It was in your post of June 8th
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/368TGP_oriani.pdf
I'm one of many lurkers that pay close attention to most of the topics
presented here.
I value the insight of most of the members of this list on both on-topic and
However, I would like to know, based on your model, exactly which kinds of
atoms and how I need to arrange them in a solid or living cell to cause a
nuclear reaction to be initiated
?
Answer:? Construct an inverse Bose condensate of protons and vibrate that
condensate at a frequency
Answer:? Construct an inverse Bose condensate of protons and vibrate that
condensate at a frequency determined by the dimensional constant of 1.094
megahertz-meters.
How do we do this? Must and inverse Bose condensate have mobile protons?
Will phonon vibrations within the
On Jun 18, 2009, at 12:29 AM, William Beaty wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
I don't see the problem. All such subjects already have breathing
room. If you want to post on a subject then post on the subject. If
anyone has interest in contributing they will post on it.
Thanks for the preprint Frank. Unfortunately some of the equations are
not visible, no doubt because I use a Mac.
On Jun 18, 2009, at 12:08 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
However, I would like to know, based on your model, exactly which
kinds of atoms and how I need to arrange them in a solid
You are proposing more than downshifting. You are proposing the 24 MeV is
converted instantly to a large collection of photons by some process. What is
this process? ?Why does the photon energy reside in the RF band and not in the
optical or X-ray regions? ?In addition, energetic particles
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Horace Heffnerhheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Note - CR-39 is $400 a sheet.
Maybe we could utilize a polycarbonate lens from some used eyeglasses?
Terry
Several people have suggested that a Bose Condensate is involved. I have
trouble with this concept because these structures are expected to have very
low bonding energy, hence have been observed only near absolute zero. In
addition, such a structure based on hydrogen is still pure speculation.
On Jun 18, 2009, at 2:15 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Several people have suggested that a Bose Condensate is involved. I
have trouble with this concept because these structures are expected
to have very low bonding energy, hence have been observed only near
absolute zero. In addition,
Let me see if I can explain what you are saying in your paper.
1. You accept that Planck's constant describes the energy of photons.
2. You propose that your constant describes the geometry (size) of the
emitting structure.
3. You assume the size of the photon is given by rp, as defined in
I actually wondered if that could be the reason you already had not done so,
of course now I have to wonder if it is specific to the idea or rather
general, though I suppose I would need to leave that up to my imagination to
work out..
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Jones Beene
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Well Frank, such ideas have value only when they show why and how most
observed behaviors occur and how to make the behavior occur more
consistently and at higher levels. All theories I know about met only a
small
Harvey, I can never quite seem to understand anything you say.
Please clarify The greatest mystery that perplexed me for years was how the
discharge itself could emit EM as a sort of linear antennae.
Since I have the opposite problem IF we are talking about the same thing, I
could see a reason
There are plenty of retired scientists/engineers enjoying comfortable
pensions right now. If enough of them contributed a fraction of their
income to a fund
for cold fusion research something significant could be accomplished
besides improving their golf game. ;-)
harry
- Original Message
More links...
JLN Patent
http://www.google.com/patents?q=10%2F472%2C714btnG=Search+Patents
Stiffler's research
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cR1KOy0hbuMNR=1
Imris Pavel's Optical Electrostatic Generator
http://www.rexresearch.com/imris/imris.htm
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:40 AM, John
Harry Veeder wrote:
There are plenty of retired scientists/engineers enjoying comfortable
pensions right now. If enough of them contributed a fraction of their income
to a fund for cold fusion research . . .
We don't need their money. We need their support. We need them to read
papers, learn
The following are some notes I made regarding use of CR-39, and other
SPAWAR related things.
It may be possible to gain some discriminatory information of
particle type by depositing very thin layers of materials on a CR-39
detector, and then removing them prior to NaOH etching. This
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
The price of CR-39 is quite bothersome for amateurs like me though.
It would be good to find a cheaper alternative!
I have a couple pounds of it, 1.5mm thickness, unknown age. I only just
started playing. I found that you can't mask it off with
29 matches
Mail list logo
