Thank you Horrace
I was given he opportunity to go on stage. This happened because someone
else did not show up. I took advantage of the opportunity and gave a
lecture that caught many by surprise. George Miley was at one end of the room
and Dr Martin Tajmar was at the other. I did OK
Horace Heffner wrote:
I haven't taken the time to look into this in
detail, but my first impression . . .
With all due respect, it is a bad idea to discuss
these things without looking into them in detail,
and a person's first impressions are likely to be wrong.
is that, unless there is
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:58 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
wrote:
From: Horace:
...
The site says Wooww, the power at the OUTPUT is greatly increased
without significant change at the DC input , yet there is no
effort made
From: Steven Krivit
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/SRI-Case-Repl/SRI-Case.shtml
Has anybody ever noticed that 2 out of 3 runs that show 4He growth in the
SRI Case replication show a peak and then a decrease in 4He?
This is a helium leak-tight chamber.
Where does the 4He go?
On Feb 25, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
I haven't taken the time to look into this in detail, but my
first impression . . .
With all due respect, it is a bad idea to discuss these things
without looking into them in detail, and a person's first
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Steven Krivit wrote:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/SRI-Case-Repl/SRI-Case.shtml
Has anybody ever noticed that 2 out of 3 runs that show 4He growth
in the SRI Case replication show a peak and then a decrease in 4He?
This is a helium leak-tight chamber.
Steven Krivit wrote:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/SRI-Case-Repl/SRI-Case.shtml
Has anybody ever noticed that 2 out of 3 runs that show 4He growth
in the SRI Case replication show a peak and then a decrease in 4He?
Yes. Many people have noted this. At ICCF-15 Tom Passell
Horace Heffner wrote:
is that, unless there is a typo, it makes no sense at all to
attempt to draw the 23.82 MeV line through Fig. 1 . . .
That is an expectation value.
Here you have missed the point entirely. There is no such expected
value of energy per helium atom as a function of
Horace Heffner wrote:
Has anybody ever noticed that 2 out of 3 runs that show 4He growth
in the SRI Case replication show a peak and then a decrease in 4He?
. . .
The helium flows out of the cell with the evolved H2 and O2 gasses.
Nope. This is the Case cell: D2 gas loaded, no evolved
At 09:54 AM 2/25/2010, you wrote:
Okay, I asked McKubre why he thinks the helium in the Case cell declined.
Here is part of his response, edited to remove irrelevant comments:
. . . I am glad [Krivit and the rest of you people] are encouraged to read
the paper . . .
Our gas cells are
On Feb 25, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
is that, unless there is a typo, it makes no sense at all to
attempt to draw the 23.82 MeV line through Fig. 1 . . .
That is an expectation value.
Here you have missed the point entirely. There is no such
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Steven Krivit wrote:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/SRI-Case-Repl/SRI-Case.shtml
Has anybody ever noticed that 2 out of 3 runs that show 4He growth
in the SRI Case replication show a peak and then a decrease in 4He?
This is a helium leak-tight chamber.
12 matches
Mail list logo
