Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

David Roberson wrote: > I followed the link and was not able to locate any significant test data > to conclude anything of importance. Most of the information appeared to be > associated with the old test of October 6, 2011 which may or may not be > relevant. > You are

[Vo]:NEDO cold fusion RFP still in progress

A couple of years ago, the Japanese government NEDO agency circulated a document suggesting that the government invest in cold fusion. The CleanPlanet web site describes this: cleanplanet.co.jp/news.php?lang=en This links to an article by Krivit and the NEDO proposal. In Japanese:

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Thanks Jed, I followed the link and was not able to locate any significant test data to conclude anything of importance. Most of the information appeared to be associated with the old test of October 6, 2011 which may or may not be relevant. I suppose that most of us are going to have to

[Vo]:FW: EUC Report of 2012-

David— Nice to have you back participating on Vortex-l. Your comments over the years raise many interesting technical questions.    I followed up on your recent comment about the ECU report.  I have an acquaintance that worked for the EUC and requested a follow-up of the resolution of the

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

I think even a COP which is insignificant would be useful. If the radiation emission from the nuclei is between 10

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

On 06/06/2016 09:50 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: In their motion to dismiss, I.H. mentioned multiple "reactors" that apparently all failed. I did not know there were multiple reactors. I know nothing about the others, but if you take their word for it, there were multiple failures, and no

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

How do you know the same numbers were shown to Lewan? 2016-06-07 10:57 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell : > > This data was selected by Rossi. These are same numbers and conclusions he > quoted to Lewan. >

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Dear Jed, Excuse me for joining the discussion, however the choices are simple something or nothing, excess heat or NOT excess heat- zero, nada, niente nihil etc. In the moment you accept that it was a small excess heat you are accepting implicitly that by adequate means it can be increased.. no

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Daniel Rocha wrote: It is important, since one can select data to deceive you. There were times > of malfunctioning that lasted a few days. > This data was selected by Rossi. These are same numbers and conclusions he quoted to Lewan. This dataset does not show what he

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Dear Jed, nothing about the details- it is an essential question: Is the excess heat different from zero Yes or No? Forget instruments, good or bad Forget the suicidal setup. peter On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Peter Gluck

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Apparently the seven day test of the three QuarkX reactors for an unnamed potential partner/customer has been extended for another week. I take this as a good sign that the customer is still interested. Rossi also commented that the p/c was "optimistic" and the results during the test were

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Peter Gluck wrote: Dear Jed, > > Excuse me for joining the discussion, however the choices are > simple something or nothing, excess heat or NOT excess heat- zero, nada, > niente nihil etc. > In the moment you accept that it was a small excess heat you are accepting >

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Jed, Could you direct me to a site that contains the test data that you are referring to? Also, I would like to find out exactly what equipment was used for the testing. Are either of these items available to download at any location that you are aware of? Also, How many hours long is the

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

David Roberson wrote: Could you direct me to a site that contains the test data that you are > referring to? No, sorry. It is all a big secret. I have some limited data from before the brouhaha under an NDA. Rossi gave some information during his interview with Lewan. I

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Peter Gluck wrote: Dear Jed, > > nothing about the details- it is an essential question: > Is the excess heat different from zero Yes or No? > Based on Rossi's instruments and data it is impossible to say for sure. They were intended to produce a meaningless answer. But

[Vo]:how to increase effectiveness and efficiency of LENR advancement

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/june-07-2016-increasing-effectiveness.html actually much more can be said and done- and this will happen peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com