[Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread Vibrator !
I've found Bessler's gain principle. The energy density's obviously 'infinite', and power density's limited only by material constraints. A propulsion application is also implied, but not yet tested. I've put together some WM2D sims, independently metering all component variables of the input /

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread mixent
In reply to Vibrator !'s message of Thu, 31 May 2018 18:27:36 +0100: Hi, If you are not a troll, then put it on a web page, and post a link here. Also take your prototype and measuring equipment to your local university or college and demonstrate it to a physics Profor do you only have the

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread Axil Axil
English translation https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de=ru=en=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trinitas.ru%2Frus%2Fdoc%2F0231%2F004a%2F02311041.htm On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0231/004a/02311041.htm > > 1. Analysis of microscopic traces of MHER

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread Vibrator !
..re. models - Bessler himself of course built numerous ones, each more impressive than the last. Their performances were validated by the most qualified scientists in the world - the very same people who's worked established the laws of CoM and CoR themselves - Christian Wolff, s' Gravesande,

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread John Berry
Yes, but that is hard to do. And scammers have sold stuff in the past... On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > The best way to sell an idea is to produce a product based on the idea > that can make money and lots of it. > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 8:15 PM, John Berry wrote: > >>

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread Vibrator !
I could make a video right now that'd go viral overnight - at least within our crank circles - and every back-yard inventor from here to Calcutta will promptly go start generating "energy from gravity" (in their mistaken belief anyway), whilst inadvertently applying equal opposing counter-momenta

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread Axil Axil
The common thinking about successful over unity is to produce a COP of 6 or over. The one application that you might try is a toy. If your invention can operate without any inputs, this type of toy could go viral. people would buy it just to understand how it could work. Try the toy industry. On

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread John Berry
Could you not make a design, a mirror design that cancels out the effects? On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Vibrator ! wrote: > I could make a video right now that'd go viral overnight - at least within > our crank circles - and every back-yard inventor from here to Calcutta will > promptly go

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread John Berry
Vibrator, now you have described a little better, I still implore you to put money aside. I have been studying this field for over 20 years and only sunk money into it. But what you offer could send man to the stars and stop us from damaging the planet. But as soon as money gets in the way,

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread Vibrator !
@John - cheers mate, like i say, i have indisputable proof-positive already, it's just a question of what the hell to do with it. Who to show it to, if i also want some kind of, umm, fiscal recompense.. ghastly subject, but i've been really burning the candle both ends on this for five years and

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread mixent
In reply to Vibrator !'s message of Fri, 1 Jun 2018 04:01:20 +0100: Hi, We humans use about 500 quad/yr of energy. At that rate it would take 5 trillion years to use all the kinetic energy of the Earth going around the Sun. Every movement on the surface of the planet imparts angular momentum to

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread Axil Axil
The best way to sell an idea is to produce a product based on the idea that can make money and lots of it. On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 8:15 PM, John Berry wrote: > correction: Ideally film the construction > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:13 PM, John Berry wrote: > >> Hi vibrator. The "right"

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread John Berry
correction: Ideally film the construction On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:13 PM, John Berry wrote: > Hi vibrator. The "right" people are hard to fine. > > Very few people will consider that the CoM or the CoE could possibly be > violated and won't even humor you. > > Actually, that's not true, a

RE: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread Chris Zell
Build it. Simulations aren't enough. I do think there might be a way to use centrifugal force that hasn't been exploited yet, as with the Linevich patent.

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread Vibrator !
I've always been of the same opinion... up till now. The thing is, a real model is inherently suspect - defeating its ostensible purpose. Batteries and motors can be hidden, etc. Suppose you surround your build with meters. Meters for everything. Meters FOR the meters. All cross-referencing

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread Axil Axil
http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0231/004a/02311041.htm 1. Analysis of microscopic traces of MHER from bodies of revolution. Experiments with bodies of revolution were carried out on a special installation. The installation consisted of a collectorless high-speed motor (up to 50,000 revolutions

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

2018-05-31 Thread John Berry
Hi vibrator. The "right" people are hard to fine. Very few people will consider that the CoM or the CoE could possibly be violated and won't even humor you. Actually, that's not true, a lot of people who don't know what that even means will happily believe you, but they will not be of any use