Dear Horace,
Thanks for the response. This is my initial foray into the area. I disagree
about the polarizing beam splitter - it transmits, not absorbs. Losses and
attenuation can be minimised. Yes signal will be subject to noise but this
can be error corrected out. As long as some signal get
Sorry chaps and chapessess,
Gonna have to unsubscribe because I just won't be in
to read the list messages. When I get back there will be probably hundreds
which will take our exchange server (snore!) about an hour to sort out with all
the uni. traffic.
Bye bye,
Remi.
Dr. Storms wrote: I think you all are missing the point of the missile
defense system. It
is to defend us from China in 10 years, not NK now.
Possibly, however the premature deployment will inhibit only the irrational.
China knows it is ineffective.
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:48:27 -0500, you wrote:
Dr. Storms wrote: I think you all are missing the point of the missile
defense system. It
is to defend us from China in 10 years, not NK now.
Possibly, however the premature deployment will inhibit only the irrational.
China knows it is
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate. -
Henry J. Tillman
John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:48:27 -0500, you wrote:
Dr. Storms wrote: I think you all are missing the point of the missile
defense system. It
is to defend us from China in 10 years, not NK now.
Possibly, however the premature deployment will inhibit only the
Horace Heffner scolds,
As I recall there were recently a number of vortexians
who doubted that
the vector potential can be put to any practical use.
If you are talking about what I wrote then you completely
overlooked the
significance.
No, I wasn't referring to any particular posting...
Gentlemen,
I think it ws back in about 2000 or so that I came
across the website of the ATG group that had developed
the little nested toroid experiment. Don't recall the
name of the fellow I corresponded with briefly, but I
spent maybe 3 weeks trying to replicate their set-up
and claims.
It
Hey Nick.
I'm still of the opinion that leakage flux is
the causative agent here, at least for the conductive
material being moved by the coils. I can see
your explaination would make sense for the lesser
magnitude effect seen with the non-conductors,
although I would expect some effect due to
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:42:02 -0700, you wrote:
John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:48:27 -0500, you wrote:
Dr. Storms wrote: I think you all are missing the point of the missile
defense system. It
is to defend us from China in 10 years, not NK now.
Possibly, however the
Keith,
After I potted the unit, as I recall, I lost the
effect on all materials. As metals go, I had tried
little niblets, BBs and rods of copper, aluminum, and
bismuth. Now I DID NOT try a long rod suspended
horizontally through the holes of a horizontal facing
toroid pair, howevah. I agree
John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:42:02 -0700, you wrote:
John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:48:27 -0500, you wrote:
Dr. Storms wrote: I think you all are missing the point of the missile
defense system. It
is to defend us from China in 10 years, not NK
Hey Ed + John.
Ed writes:
Yes, because China is gaining more by buying the US in contrast to
taking.
Exactly; but doesn't this solve the problem? Red seems not to understand
that when our government borrows money to pay for things rather than
tax, what it is doing is selling the country to
If gravity, gravitons, had a speed c_g less than the speed of light c, and
gravity began with the big bang, then objects exceeding c_g at the time of
the big bang could outrun gravity itself. It seems reasonable that c_g =
c. Even if in all cases c_g = c, objects near the speed of c or even just
Ed Storms wrote:
John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:48:27 -0500, you wrote:
Dr. Storms wrote: I think you all are missing the point of the missile
defense system. It
is to defend us from China in 10 years, not NK now.
Possibly, however the premature deployment will
Keith wrote I'm not sure why W. is so anxious to sell..
Maybe he knows something we dont.
I have pondered that question since year 2001. Perhaps
we have 2 Republican parties..
Richard
Blank Bkgrd.gif
Vortexians, I've been reading various posts on China, and have
decided to make a few comments. I was shopping for a set of pump
pliers. I purchased a Chinese made set but they slipped when a
grasped a nut. I subsequently returned them and purchased an American
made set. I picked up a Chinese
Mike Carrell writes,
Anyone with a new awareness of China should get a copy of
1421 The Year China Discovered America and also dig into
the 1421 website,
There is local (SF Bay area) connection to this story :
http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/7792971.htm?1c
Supposedly one of
18 matches
Mail list logo
