Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused
Well, it is difficult to ignore Dr. Brenda, PhD's credentials, and the
fact that she is and has worked in the field of climate science.
Furthermore Dr. Brenda said the mass
thomas malloy wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused
Well, it is difficult to ignore Dr. Brenda, PhD's credentials, and the
fact that she is and has worked in the field of climate science.
Furthermore Dr.
Howdy Vorts,
As the world turns, the rant goes on and the stomach turns. People are not
destroying the planet.. maybe themselves individually and in collective
groups.. but not the planet.. that's coming, but by design and not by human
decree or PHD.
Richard
One sided propaganda, she was
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Howdy Vorts,
As the world turns, the rant goes on and the stomach turns. People are
not destroying the planet.. maybe themselves individually and in
collective groups.. but not the planet.. that's coming, but by design
and not by human decree or PHD.
Richard
One sided
Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
There are scientists who disagree with Dr. Brenda,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU
No doubt, but Dr. Brenda said nearly all climate scientists now agree
with the recent overwhelming data that clearly indicates
- Original Message -
From: Paul Lowrance [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 2:05 AM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.
There are scientists who disagree with Dr. Brenda,
thomas malloy wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
There are scientists who disagree with Dr. Brenda,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU
No doubt, but Dr. Brenda said nearly all climate scientists now agree
with the recent overwhelming data
Kyle R. Mcallister wrote:
[snip
Should we try to cut emissions of bad gases? Sure, why not, but not at
the detriment of the basis of our society, that is, the working class.
Maybe anyone in an environmentalist organization should be given a
severe tax increase to support a changeover to
One warped comment to add into the bogosity mix:
People are not destroying the planet.. maybe
themselves
individually and in collective groups.. but not the
planet..
I agree with this part of Richard's summation, but he
may be viewing the situation in the context of a
narrow religious
Indeed Paul, whether you and Dr Brenda and the IPCC http://www.ipcc.ch/ are
right is irrelevant. The real question is, can humanity remediate global
warming, and how, we should be practical about this.
Thomas suggested some drives as propulsion means for space parasols, but it
seems to me that
I think we should aim all the fire-hoses on earth at the sun, then say ready!
set! go! (The element of surprise is so important.).
P.
- Original Message
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 12:08:54 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global
BlankHowdy Vorts,
The topic of global warming came up during a small discussion at the Dime Box
saloon which usually results in a brawl.
Today our resident mathematics PHD explained global warming using basic
geometry which I quote below..
There were three Indian squaws. One slept on a
I haven't read much in this thread, but in the end it doesn't matter if the
polluting man is doing is the cause of Global Warming.
Very few are questioning if Global Warming is happening, if it will be a
problem.
The issue of man's fault in causing it is just a blame game and unimportant,
it
On 4/21/07, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This goes to prove that the squaw of the
hippopotamus is equal to the sons of the squaws of the other two hides.
Just goes to show that a pie by two fag gurus is flavorable.
Good one, RC.
Terry
14 matches
Mail list logo
