Re: [Vo]:Response from McKubre regarding the Case cell

2010-02-25 Thread Steven Krivit
At 09:54 AM 2/25/2010, you wrote: Okay, I asked McKubre why he thinks the helium in the Case cell declined. Here is part of his response, edited to remove irrelevant comments: . . . I am glad [Krivit and the rest of you people] are encouraged to read the paper . . . Our gas cells are helium-

Re: [Vo]:SRI Experiment HH

2010-02-25 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 25, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: is that, unless there is a typo, it makes no sense at all to attempt to draw the 23.82 MeV line through Fig. 1 . . . That is an expectation value. Here you have missed the point entirely. There is no such "expect

Re: [Vo]:SRI Case Expt 4He

2010-02-25 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Steven Krivit wrote: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/SRI-Case-Repl/SRI-Case.shtml Has anybody ever noticed that 2 out of 3 runs that show 4He growth in the SRI Case replication show a peak and then a decrease in 4He? This is a helium leak-tight chamber.

Re: [Vo]:SRI Case Expt 4He

2010-02-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
Horace Heffner wrote: Has anybody ever noticed that 2 out of 3 runs that show 4He growth in the SRI Case replication show a peak and then a decrease in 4He? . . . The helium flows out of the cell with the evolved H2 and O2 gasses. Nope. This is the Case cell: D2 gas loaded, no evolved gas.

Re: [Vo]:SRI Experiment HH

2010-02-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
Horace Heffner wrote: is that, unless there is a typo, it makes no sense at all to attempt to draw the 23.82 MeV line through Fig. 1 . . . That is an expectation value. Here you have missed the point entirely. There is no such "expected value" of energy per helium atom as a function of

Re: [Vo]:SRI Case Expt 4He

2010-02-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
Steven Krivit wrote: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/SRI-Case-Repl/SRI-Case.shtml Has anybody ever noticed that 2 out of 3 runs that show 4He growth in the SRI Case replication show a peak and then a decrease in 4He? Yes. Many people have noted this. At ICCF-15 Tom Passell distributed

Re: [Vo]:SRI Case Expt 4He

2010-02-25 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Steven Krivit wrote: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/SRI-Case-Repl/SRI-Case.shtml Has anybody ever noticed that 2 out of 3 runs that show 4He growth in the SRI Case replication show a peak and then a decrease in 4He? This is a helium leak-tight chamber.

Re: [Vo]:SRI Experiment HH

2010-02-25 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 25, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: I haven't taken the time to look into this in detail, but my first impression . . . With all due respect, it is a bad idea to discuss these things without looking into them in detail, and a person's first impressio

RE: [Vo]:SRI Case Expt 4He

2010-02-25 Thread Jones Beene
From: Steven Krivit http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/SRI-Case-Repl/SRI-Case.shtml Has anybody ever noticed that 2 out of 3 runs that show 4He growth in the SRI Case replication show a peak and then a decrease in 4He? This is a helium leak-tight chamber. Where does the 4He go? Two

Re: [Vo]:Naudin's improved "generator"

2010-02-25 Thread Horace Heffner
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Horace Heffner wrote: On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:58 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: From: Horace: ... The site says "Wooww, the power at the OUTPUT is greatly increased without significant change at the DC input ", yet there is no effort made

Re: [Vo]:SRI Experiment HH

2010-02-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
Horace Heffner wrote: I haven't taken the time to look into this in detail, but my first impression . . . With all due respect, it is a bad idea to discuss these things without looking into them in detail, and a person's first impressions are likely to be wrong. is that, unless there is

[Vo]:I'm at the Rocket Conference and I will speak tomorrow

2010-02-25 Thread FZNIDARSIC
Thank you Horrace I was given he opportunity to go on stage. This happened because someone else did not show up. I took advantage of the opportunity and gave a lecture that caught many by surprise. George Miley was at one end of the room and Dr Martin Tajmar was at the other. I did OK