On Aug 20, 2011, at 4:20 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:32:03
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Using a mean earth diameter of 6371 km, a mean albedo of 0.3, and
solar insolation of 1 W/m^2, we have a reflected power of:
Solar insolation is aroun
On Aug 20, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
It is you who does not "get it". Investing in a free energy scheme
which supposedly produces "excess" or "free" heat is not sensible
without expert independent calorimetry being applied which
determines a total ener
lame LENR H-Ni run report by Sergio Focardi and Francesco Piantelli, 9
pages, Il Nuovo Cimento, November 1998 -- recent news: Rich Murray
2011.08.20
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011_08_01_archive.htm
Saturday, August 20, 2011
[ at end of each long page, click on Older Posts ]
http://groups.yahoo.c
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
> I stumbled upon in the internet a very simple method for doing
> extremely accurate (up to two or three significant digits, depending
> on insulation) calorimetric analysis for any water boiler. Method is
> simple and all measurements are accurate:
>
> – Just weight 5 kg
Horace Heffner wrote:
> It is you who does not "get it". Investing in a free energy scheme which
> supposedly produces "excess" or "free" heat is not sensible without expert
> independent calorimetry being applied which determines a total energy
> balance for critical demonstration tests. It i
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:32:03 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Using a mean earth diameter of 6371 km, a mean albedo of 0.3, and
>solar insolation of 1 W/m^2, we have a reflected power of:
Solar insolation is around 1 kW (not 1 W) / m^2.
>
> P = (6.371x10^6 m)^2 * Pi *
In reply to noone noone's message of Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:18:32 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>Krivit and other worshippers of Widom Larsen theory do not make any sense. The
>reaction is not a weak interaction, but a fusion reaction. The neutrons are
>supposed to be protons and electrons that become vi
On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:37 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
I don't know why NASA say this. I believe that our high power
directional radar emissions would be very detectable and we need
not worry about atmospheric signatures.
Frank Z
Hi Frank,
Using a mean earth diameter of 6371 km, a me
Jouni. Your comments are still wishful thinking and misinterpretation of
what I wrote.
you wrote:
<>
What you are still missing, despite your blizzard of rhetoric, is that
climate science (and the forestry scientists in particular) who wrote the
IPCC bit about forestry and mitigation are not
9 matches
Mail list logo
