I think the explanation offered by Jeff is pretty good. As long as a
significant electric field is within the cell conductive region charged ions
will be driven by that field in such a manner as to eliminate it. This
concentrates the electric field so that it appears across the non
Axil, the way I understand it from your posts is that: the 1-dimensional
nanotube would capture electrons in the plasma that will then accumulate charge
that will screen the coulomb barrier on any atom that may happen to be nearby.
When coulomb barrier is screened, fusion occurs, or fission
First photo of shadow of single atom
http://phys.org/news/2012-07-photo-shadow-atom.html
Excerpts:
=
Holding an atom still long enough to take its photo, while remarkable in
itself, is not new technology; the atom is isolated within a chamber and
held in free space by
Some other interesting science news:
New method knocks out stubborn electron problem
http://phys.org/news/2012-07-method-stubborn-electron-problem.html
Excerpt:
Molecules have anywhere from tens to thousands of electrons, and the
computational complexity of simulating their behavior
As a preface, it is not known what kind of nanotubes Vu1 is using. If they
are using SWNT, then the electrons will be entangled and coherent. I have
not looked at the patent is detail, but I doubt that this sort of detail
will be provided by Au1.
In any case. their nanotubes will be well made
Amazing.
The atom looks like it might be composed of concentric shells.
Anyways, haven't we been able to visualize better resolution than this with
electron microscopy?
Jojo
BTW, how do you resolve a electron with light? Isn't an electron smaller than
the smallest wavelength of visible
Hello group,
A long post by Christos Stremmenos just got posted on JONP. It appears
to have been written in both English and Italian:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=645cpage=4#comment-269793
For convenience, here it is, in its entirety:
Christos Stremmenos
July 4th, 2012 at
Mark,
Physicists identify new quantum state allowing three -- but
not two -- atoms to stick together
http://phys.org/news/2012-07-strength-physicists-quantum-state-.html
Not sure it is really 'new' since we have talked about Efimov
after some thinking I realized I made a few wrong statements - see below
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:18 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I think the explanation offered by Jeff is pretty good. As long as a
significant electric field is within the cell conductive region charged ions
I have no idea now what LENR reactions would be favored by
three atoms of f/H operating as a locked triad bosonic isomer. But that lack
of speculation for now is mainly because the espresso machine is not fired
up yet...
...set you spam filter
At 11:46 PM 7/3/2012, Finlay MacNab wrote:
Sorry, I fail to see why the voltage drop is 3kv across the acrylic
layer. Why is that exactly?
There are three regions involved, between the plates that are
connected to a high voltage supply, 6 KV.
There is the first cell wall, 1/16 inch (1.6
Nice pictures.
A breeze might cause water to form curving icicles as it freezes.
harry
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:51 AM, David Jonsson
davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
How can ice crystals grow to ths big size? Image is from around the volcano
Mount Erebus at Antarctica
The European Commission - Directorate-General for Research and
Innovation has published a report in which they recommend funding
research in LENR.
http://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/emerging-materials-report_en.pdf
Does this mean that the topic will finally get mainstream
Thanks!
He is right, my first question had to be formulated differently
from the point of view of management science.
I will answer on my Blog, JONP does not accept my messages.
Peter
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello group,
A long post by
I haven't read the report myself, but I learned from a facebook group
that it contains a recommendation by some contributing professionals
for research into LENR which is not the same as an official
recommendation by the commission.
harry
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Moab Moab
Your argument assumes that the there is no air gap between the dielectric and
the charged plates. It also assumes that the electrolyte behaves like a
regular 100ohm resistor.
In this case, where the movement of ions in electrolyte is dominated by
diffusion and mixing from the gas bubbles
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, if one presumes that it
means anything.
At 12:11 AM 7/4/2012, Rich Murray wrote:
I'm glad to see my post has ignited a local hot spot in Vortex-L...
Some good will come out of it. I do intend to take this to the
original authors for comment,
My dear friends,
My Interview with Defkalion Green Technologies Global has
generated a reaction of negative enthusiasm from Professor
Christos Stremmenos who seems to be a convinced
Rossiphile. (So am I within some limits.)
I have answered to Stremmenos' critics on my blog:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
That could be nothing more
than trivia, or not. It does indicate neutrons to spare if you are in the
camp that thinks that Ni-H involves some new-physics kind of gamma-less
nuclear reaction with no subsequent decay.
What
So much for the peer-review system. See:
slatest.slate.com/posts/2012/07/03/japanese_anesthesiologist_clinches_world_record_for_retractions_publishing_172_fabricated_papers.html
Without the peer review system, there wouldn't be fake papers.
2012/7/4 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
So much for the peer-review system. See:
slatest.slate.com/posts/2012/07/03/japanese_anesthesiologist_clinches_world_record_for_retractions_publishing_172_fabricated_papers.html
--
The peer review system is as marriage or democracy- creates many problems
but nothing better was invented yet.
Peter
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Without the peer review system, there wouldn't be fake papers.
2012/7/4 Jed Rothwell
I was sarcastic...
2012/7/4 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
The peer review system is as marriage or democracy- creates many problems
but nothing better was invented yet.
Peter
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
Without the peer review system,
Stremmenos' speaking out is definitely important.
Us observers of the scene know about this unpleasant dispute
grosso modo.
Let me summarize:
1) Stremmenos definitely, firmly believes in LENR, not as a
weak phenomenon, but as a strong one.
Not only he BELIEVES, but he claims to KNOW from first
Well. it's still a few months before the day of Atonement, but it looks like
you are being made into a convenient scapegoat, Peter.
He clearly got himself into an allegiance bind months ago, and then failed
to make an early choice of teams - so he became almost a nobody . losing
favor with
If you follow the papers of roland benabou on collective delusion, group
think,
one conclusion is thare there should be ex-ante measures to protect
dissenters.
like the free speech in US.
peer review is like democracy, without a constitution to block dangerous
votes, it became dictatorship of
I attended the International Low Energy Nuclear Reactions Symposium
(ILENRS-12) at The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia. I
just got back. The website for the conference is here:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
Actual experimental results are more toward double, the value, over 40
MeV/He-4, which very likely reflects the difficulty in capturing all the
helium (if helium is not captured and measured, particularly if it
I wrote:
Assuming for the moment that the 40 MeV/4He result is solid and can be
reliably replicated, and going with helium as a predominant non-radiative
byproduct, what does this say about the reactions involved? Does it mean
that there would need to be more than helium generation, or is
Well, there's a saying in Zen about swallowing the Niagara Falls in
one gulp -- perhaps a tsunami of verbal arguments by Lomax may float
visions that are plausibly contrary to the visions aired by Murray --
but the possiblities of micro and nano level storage and release of
chemical energy by
I wrote:
Has someone put together a comprehensive catalog of the branches that would
need to be considered, including ones involving neutrons, either for
palladium or nickel, for the kinds of energy ranges we're talking about?
This would be very helpful. I find EXFOR hard to work with; it
I also agree that it must be the escape of helium that causes the mismatch, and
I notice that the numbers are definitely pointing in that direction. The
amount of energy released per reaction should be well defined and equal to the
mass deficit if the end product is helium with hydrogen as
Impurities can lower (or increase) the freezing point of one side of the
flowing water allowing it to freeze while the other side is still flowing,
thereby creating a curved icicle.
Breeze will not explain why the curve changes direction but impurities can.
Jojo
- Original Message
Nothing unpleasant, my friend! I have a very deep experience in disputes,
scientific and technical; that includes discusiions
for quality standards- verbal fights, negotiations with potential
partners..The arguments of S. are weak. Politically he is a personality a
Greek patriot, cold fusion is a
At 12:00 PM 7/4/2012, Finlay MacNab wrote:
Your argument assumes that the there is no air
gap between the dielectric and the charged
plates. It also assumes that the electrolyte
behaves like a regular 100ohm resistor.
The plates are against the cell walls. Sure, you
can make up an air gap.
35 matches
Mail list logo
