I do not follow these theory debates. But it is my impression that people
consider the W-L theory extremely far-fetched and physically impossible.
They do not oppose it out of personal animosity.
I find it a little annoying that the W-L proponents manage to put
themselves front and center in the
If it is physically impossible then it has to be ignored not attacked. It
came as an alternative to many other theories that gave not much to the
CF/LENR experiments- perhaps as a desperate solution.It is not easy to
demonstrate that impossibillty.
But it is really impossible, how could it had
I have had a lot of non-peer review PR. One of my supporters, The Alien
Scientist, has just been bared by the internet police.
Sorry this has happened. I have two books at Amazon and they sold some but not
well. IE published numerous articles for me.
Glen Robertson published one paper for me
Peter has raised an important subject, but one so filled with emotion
and complex arguments, knowing where to start is the problem. The
discussion of theory we are witnessing is an indication of a deeper
problem.
Yes, CF is difficult to explain, but how we go about this discussion
is
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Most chemists have no training in nuclear physics and most physicists have
no training in chemistry.
That is an exaggeration. They have *some* training.
Unfortunately, many physicists believe they understand all aspects of
Nature.
That they
Thank you for your vote of confidence Chuck. I've have grown tired of this
business and do not work on or think about new energy anymore. I don't even
feel like working on the paper. It's time for me to move on. I may start on a
new job teaching industrial electricity. This will take all
I wrote:
A 10 mW heat source may well be commercial in 20 years. It would be
enough to drive a cell phone.
Oops. No, it would take more like 12 W, I think. 3 W is the most a cell
phone is allowed to produce, for health safety reasons. I suppose you could
trickle charge the thing with a
Original Message
Subject: GlobalBEM Newsletter 03
From: Breakthrough Energy Movement newslet...@globalbem.com
To: fznidar...@aol.com
CC:
Presentations online, new media website, 2013 conference, GlobalBEM 2.0
Believe me, IBM is NOT -- repeat NOT -- thinking about cold fusion. This is
about conventional alternative energy. A place like IBM will be the last on
earth to express interest in cold fusion. They have always been
conservative.
NI or Google, maybe. Not IBM.
- Jed
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Believe me, IBM is NOT -- repeat NOT -- thinking about cold fusion.
If not, why are they quoting Brian O'Leary? Weren't he and Gene buds?
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Believe me, IBM is NOT -- repeat NOT -- thinking about cold fusion.
If not, why are they quoting Brian O'Leary? Weren't he and Gene buds?
OH, it
I read yesterday that two people in the U.S. are still receiving disability
pensions from the Civil War, 148 years after it ended. They are both the
children of Civil War veterans who were themselves disabled their entire
lives and unable to work. Probably, their fathers died when they were very
In 2004, the last widow of a civil war veteran died.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/5106000/ns/us_news/t/last-widow-civil-war-veteran-dies/#.UUtlrLLOMkc
Craig
On 03/21/2013 03:52 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I read yesterday that two people in the U.S. are still receiving
disability pensions from the
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:51:45 +:
Hi,
Somehow I suspect that all they have shown is that their model is wrong.
Un-particle? Are they suggesting hole current not balanced by electron
current?
From: Ron Kita [mailto:chiralex.k...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Jed,
For cell phone the maximum power from the mobile is given by the equilibrium
between Uplink (Handset - base station) and Downlink (Base station -
Handset). Hopefully, base stations have a better maximum power and also a
better sensitivity for the receive path (around -110 dBm). The mobile
Recent experiments in superconductivity should concern the people who want
to understand what is happening in a LENR lattice.
http://phys.org/news/2013-03-electrons-cuprate-superconductors-defy-convention.html#ajTabs
Since superconductivity and LENR have much in common, this new discovery
could
The key mechanism of the WL theory is defined in a way to make it very
hard or impossible to verify.
The specification of the ultra-low energy neutron was engineered to make it
virtually undetectable because it doesn’t move far from the nucleus before
its immense nuclear absorption cross section
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The specification of the ultra-low energy neutron was engineered to make it
virtually undetectable because it doesn’t move far from the nucleus before
its immense nuclear absorption cross section results in its almost
Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be wrote:
At the beginning of a call, the mobile is emitting at full power. Then the
power is decreased over time if reception conditions are good at base
station.
. . .
For GSM 2G 900Mhz Band, the maximum power is 2W (33 dBm)
For GSM 2G 1800Mhz Band,
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
If not, why are they quoting Brian O'Leary? Weren't he and Gene buds?
OH, it is Frank who injected IBM. Figures.
Yeah, I don't see IBM listed anywhere but in the Subject heading. I presume
that was the heading of the message sent to Frank Z.
Maybe
Here is the response by Krivit, which he asked be posted on the
discussion groups.
Ed
Begin forwarded message:
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Date: March 21, 2013 4:17:54 PM MDT
To: Steven Krivit stev...@newenergytimes.com
Cc: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Subject: Re:
If the LENR mobile is coupled with a battery, then the battery will act as
the main power supply when mobile is in call state. LENR power station
should be seen here only has an embedded charger. In this condition, for the
majority of the users, continuous tenth of mW is enough.
In current
Peterson, C., *The Guardian Poplar, A Memoir of Deep Roots, Journey and
Rediscovery. *2012, Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/PetersonCtheguardia.pdf
Selected portions of chapter 12 from Chase Peterson?s autobiography.
Peterson was president of the
As you note, ultracold neutrons are an old and respected niche of physics -
and these known cold neutrons are easily detectable and bear not the
slightest resemblance to the W-L concoction – which IMHO is almost in the
category of brain-dead.
How can low energy be anything other than ultra-cold?
Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be wrote:
In current available mobiles, it is not possible to have continuous call
at 2W for a long period of time before batteries get empty.
So, in a dire emergency, present-day cell phones soon run out of power? I
mean an emergency when cell phone tower
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
As you note, ultracold neutrons are an old and respected niche of physics
- and these known cold neutrons are easily detectable and bear not
the slightest resemblance to the W-L concoction – which IMHO is almost in
the category of brain-dead.
I think
Ludwik, no fight is being prolonged. Steve made a response and I
answered it. I plan no other response to him. Are you suggesting that
differences of opinion be hidden? We must discuss theory and such
discussions naturally create an emotional response. The only issue is
that this be done
On Mar 21, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
As you note, ultracold neutrons are an old and respected niche of
physics - and these known cold neutrons are easily detectable and
bear not the slightest resemblance to the W-L concoction – which
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The key mechanism of the WL theory is defined in a way to make it very
hard or impossible to verify.
As I said, I cannot judge the situation, but if that is the case, it is not
falsifiable and therefore not a valid theory. It also sounds like what I
call a
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The key mechanism of the WL theory is defined in a way to make it very
hard or impossible to verify.
As I said, I cannot judge the situation, but if that is the case, it is not
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 3:29:38 PM
Peterson, C., The Guardian Poplar, A Memoir of Deep Roots, Journey
and Rediscovery. 2012, Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/PetersonCtheguardia.pdf
Shout-out to lenr-canr :
Unfortunately, the EPRI-NSF
Eric,
The website you cite has data for ultracold neutrons (energy ~300 neV.)
Could any LENR experiment ever produce such cold neutrons?
Even at just room temp, thermal neutrons possess energy of ~30 meV.
Wouldn't ultracold neutrons be a tiny part of the Boltzman distribution?
The thermal
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:27 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
W-L electron capture may, or may not, occur, but AFAIK no one proposed
that neutrons would be generated ultracold.
I thought that ultracold and ultra low momentum were basically
synonymous -- please correct me if I'm wrong. If
Eric,
If LENR neutrons are indeed generated as proposed by W-L, almost all will
be in the thermal range - quite a low momentum by fusion standards.
I believe some experimenters have detected escaping neutrons.
I do not know whether their measurements are valid.
If they are, we still have to
34 matches
Mail list logo
