On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:24 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
You just Unified Science and Religion!
***And yet, such an accomplishment has been greeted with a yawn on
Vortex...
Who makes crop circles?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_circle
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:18
sorry the whole biblical stuff does bot belong here.
everybody is entitled to their own believe. Why do we want to find out who
is right?
Live by your believes and let others live by theirs - end of story.
Tired of the biblical or Islamic or Buddha ways of thinking.
Tell you what you are all
You failed to answer any of the questions I posed in a useful scientific
manner. All you have generated is a continuous stream of insults and that is
not a constructive way to discuss issues. I am sorry but I will not be able to
respond to your inputs without more detailed information.
someone uninformed making a joke on cold fusion
http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2014/08/highlights-from-25-years-of-cold-fusion.html?showComment=1409401642196#c4573727547886427436
when joking someone, good idea is to get informed first.
Who are you to say it does not belong? Perhaps you would throw out all of
historicity of the bible, even on mundane events? You'd throw out ALL of
reliable history when you do so, throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
How incredibly close minded for such an open minded group. I see you
15 minute video on technology and robots.. replacing humans.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 1:05 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
You failed to answer any of the questions I posed in a useful
scientific manner.
***Well, maybe if any of your questions were posed in a useful scientific
manner, they'd get answered. You didn't even read the wikipedia
That's embarrassing. Just saw Jed's post. With apologies, please
ignore my duplicate post.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Brad Lowe ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
15 minute video on technology and robots.. replacing humans.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU
Brad Lowe ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
That's embarrassing. Just saw Jed's post. With apologies, please
ignore my duplicate post.
Great minds think alike!
Plus, I thought you mean How to survive a robot uprising.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-G3RoBHMu-o
- Jed
At 07:55 PM 8/29/2014, Jojo Iznart wrote:

The answer to this question is 100
million.
That was a very good answer (based on the available
sources.)
Sending a human to the past? Or a robot that speaks broken English?
2014-08-30 16:28 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Plus, I thought you mean How to survive a robot uprising.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
I would not want to live an eternity in heaven where dancing is frowned
upon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6K7OC-IKnA
My cousins are one-half Greek. The parties are memorable.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
Kevin, don't think to hard, it just makes tired. Your response is not worth
the paper it is written on (Not).
I am not talking about any religion. I am not telling you how it is. I am
not asking you to verify my opinion. The reason are several:
1. You are not qualified.
2. If I wanted to talk
Just a note to some of the newer Vorts who may be wondering how moderation
works in Vortex. Vortex is moderated, but only very lightly. The list
relies heavily upon the self-discipline of members to keep a courteous tone
and to moderate the amount of their own contributions. Ideally the tone of
Dave--
As seems to be the case frequently, I tend to agree with you sentiment that
Vortex invites fresh ideas about nature, not the nature of people, however.
As a result I do not consider comments regarding individuals participating in
Vortex and do not respond.
Bob
Sent from
Alain-
The last comment in the blog link below is interesting. It suggests that a
pillar in the field of Oil exploration is leaving for greener pastures in the
field of LENR at STM. I am glad to hear this, since I have a long interest in
STM.
The rumored French Govt call for George’s
Jones--
After reviewing this thread I do not think I made the following observation
stemming from the theory of relativistic DDL discussed by Vavra etal in their
1993 paper. It notes that the strongest repulsion of the lower electronic
levels is not the lowest energy level, but about level
Bob - There were substantial changes made by Va’vra in
moving to QED which confuse the overall situation - but when we look at the
big picture – and consider all the theorists who have looked at the DDL,
there is still an excellent fit for the 3.7 keV species of Naudts fitting
the
At 07:55 PM 8/29/2014, Jojo Iznart wrote:
Thus, Angels are in
fact multi-dimensional creatures. They can come and go into our
dimension, assume any shape they like in our dimension
So far, so good.
and can occupy the
same space at the same time in our dimension.
That's not clear at all.
First,
Some of the us vortex folks think LENR involves superradiance based on
magnetic polaritons. I don't yet understand is how infrared photons are
converted to a condensed ultra short burst of an intense magnetic field.
Does anyone understand how superradiance can produce a burst of magnetic
energy?
This is the guy who merged superradiance into LENR.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuliano_Preparata
The key concept you may be looking for is a type of positive feedback called
“lock-in”. Robert Dicke was responsible for developing the lock-in amplifier
which is an indispensable tool in
Interesting arguments Alan.
I hope Eric does not begrudge me an answer to this and I hope he does not
accuse me of excessive posts as this would only be my third posts in 3 days.
Besides this have interesting scientific implications for the metaphysical.
Since, you agree that 100 million is
My friend, if this is the only reason why you reject God and heaven, you are
missing out on a lot of things.
We vorticians enjoy intellectual stimulation. We debate arcane subject matters
like number of angels on the head of a pin. because we enjoy thinking,
analysing, deep analysis and other
Neither would I, especially since God commands us to dance with joy before
Him.
Lennart:
Trying to weed out religion would whittle down Vortex to about 3 members.
Because secular humanism is a religion. Atheism is a religion. Scientism
is a religion. Heck, one of my favorite cold fusioneers sued the US Patent
Office because he believed in cold fusion, like as in a
If only we could have ways of filtering out idiotic comments, then Vortex-L
would take off in terms of popularity.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a note to some of the newer Vorts who may be wondering how moderation
works in Vortex. Vortex is
http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1991/eirv18n24-19910621/eirv18n24-19910621_022-dr_giuliano_preparata.pdf
The basic mechanism that makes superradiance work is that there must be a
system that can communicate electromagnetically only on a well-defined,
sharp frequency. If you have a lot of
another quote:
Superradiance is an ordering that comes from the fact that the matter
systems-say, electrons, atoms, molecules, nuclei, whatever--communicate
with each other in particular frequencies of the electromagnetic field. It
is a superradiating process because the radiation is enormously
OK Kevin I understand you can read but you do not understand full
sentences.
I do not want to eliminate anyone.
I do not want to discuss religion with you or others at Vortex.
I am not going to take your advice as I am already old enough to have an
established opinion.
Best Regards ,
Lennart
Yes, Kevin we all have our beliefs.
Have you ever heard about throwing stone sitting in a glasshouse.
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the
Jones--
Thanks for that repeat.
I missed it the first time.
Eric also identified the recent (2013) Va’vra paper, which is quite interesting
including it reluctance to try to discuss theory, this being a change from his
actions in the 1993 paper. I wonder what changed his mind about
31 matches
Mail list logo
